Men are born to fvck and conquer...Not to get married and have GF's

[rocksoff]

I am a younger guy (20) so my opinion on this may be biased and not based on experience, but from what I have seen in day to day life, and learned about through studying great men, I believe this to be a fact. Human's by nature are not monogaumous, men or women, All the great men that have accomplished goal's that I envy were for the most part chauvanistic and had many affairs with many women......so why is the world raised to believe we will get married and be content with one women for the rest of our live's? Besides from fvcking , most women are just a plain waste of time.....If the average male spent the time that he spends with his GF or chasing women , working on himself and his accomplishments.....well then he wouldnt have to chase shiit.....the lady's would be lining up. The reason I bring this up is because, looking back on my childhood and what I was taught, I see myself being brainfvcked into believing I should cherish a woman, when doing exactly the opposite is what make's a women cherish me, SO WHY do you think we are raised to believe these things? Is the country run by feminists? It's something ive been thinking about, Kid's are being raised to think that there testosterone and urges and pretty much everything that really define's men is bad? WTF is going on?

 

[mustfirstregister]

if your dad and mom didn't ****. How the hell you came to the world?

 

[SchoolBoy]

Social conditioning is what happened.. some conform, some don't. Some people want a girlfriend or marriage of various reasons. If your goal is sex only then forget monogamy. But if your goal is to have a family and raise healthy children, then get married or into an LTR.

Sometimes it isn't always about sex. But things mess up when men are looking for sex, but feel the need to be in a relationship before getting it.

Just my 2 cents..

 

[bigjohnson]

Humans are naturally wired to form durable pair bonds. The most common social expression of this built in wiring happens to be monogamous marriage.

 

[edger]

Totally agree with you, men are born to f*ck, not be commited to one woman. Why waste your time with just one dumb b*tch(women are a true waste of time, other than just spraying your load on). You only live once, so live it up and live in the moment, because you may die tomorrow. Mess with as many hot, attractive women as you can, this way you won't be an old man wishing to yourself that you had done that. There's nothing worse than regret.

 

[Cinamon]

I agree with Schoolboy. Life is a journey, where when you are young, you experiment and interact/sleep with different people, until you find a person that you think, you want more with, whether thats living together/marriage/ family etc.

 

[Cinamon]

Or in some mens case, when you truly know, you wont ever get anyone better than the person you are with at that moment in time.

 

[rocksoff]

I agree with Schoolboy. Life is a journey, where when you are young, you experiment and interact/sleep with different people, until you find a person that you think, you want more with, whether thats living together/marriage/ family etc.

Then the chick get's bored and want's a divorce......the man is also bored, but know's through social conditioning that only he will be in the wrong if he is found cheating on his wife, if his wife is caught, it is still the man's fault for not keeping her interested and blahblah fvckin blah he look's like a pvssy saying his wife is a slvt and what not....Look at the rate of marriages ending in divorce in the USA today, how many divorces are initiated by men? Probably a low low percenntage of them.......I could really go into an essay on this.....You could probably meet THOUSANDS of women in the world that you would fall in love with and say is "the one" and end up marrying. What's the point of marriage anyway? If you enjoy a chick's company, just leave it at that. Why get a fvcking contract by law that you are together? Marriage is just a way to get more money circulating in the economy and to give women a financial backup when they wanna leave there guy(Prenup :yes: )
because most of them just cant support themselve's. Dont get me wrong, I do have respect for women being that I was raised by a great mother who worked hard for me.....But I also realize that the only actual traits i respect in a women are their abilities to love and nurture a child(Alot are even fvckin horrible at this) and me and probably every guy on this site are not interested in that........pretty much fvck em and realize thats all theyre biologically made to do for you, not make you feel better, not to understand your problem's, not to talk to about your petty bvll**** insecurity NOTHING just to fvck and raise your kid's. MEN TODAY ARE A HUGE GROUP OF FVCKIN PVSSY's because they dont realize this....instead they are looking for someone to make them feel better about themselves, when it's theyre actions and accomplishments that should be doing this.

 

[zekko]

Humans are naturally wired to form durable pair bonds. The most common social expression of this built in wiring happens to be monogamous marriage.

I agree with this, although you'll hardly see this point of view on this forum. While I do think men are built on a primitive level to have sex with multiple women, I also think there is a natural urge to pair up at some point. I don't think the species would necessarily work as well if men didn't stay with a women long enough to build a home and help care for the family at least while the kids were growing up.

If men were all out going from one slut to the other and never settling down I bet the survival rate of children would be significantly decreased. I think this is one of the nice things about being human, you have choices. You aren't locked into just one path or the other.

 

[r0cky]

Because we're in a civil society. In the old times you had a horse and carriage and you could take it wherever it could go, if your horse took a **** in the middle of the street tough luck for the houses around. Or if you ran somebody over and they died, tough luck for them. Nowadays, there are traffic rules and you are held responsible for everything you do behind the wheel. This is just an example of how societies tend to evolve into civility.
Even in the old ages, men were monogamus, except for the powerful men. But this is in a time when in order to gain power you had to kill your competitors, and I'm talking about killing them yourself, not just sending an army to do it for you. And it was perfectly acceptable, even seen as a form of courage.

We live in a more civilized society now, where laws and sexual diseases prevent humans from acting on their every impulse.

 

[pipe007]

for me it depends...

you are only 20 years old, so everything you perceive right now its coming out through your 20 year old experience... which is to massively go out and experience dating as much as you can.... that drive of course comes from your own body factory... which controls us.

but as you grow up, and you have your needs satisfied, assuming that you get all the experience you need, and you become a mature powerful male, then other needs will kick in, the need to raise a family and have a loving wife by your side.... it might be an ideal, but it is also innate drive.

so it depends, it would be interesting to see what your thoughts are when you are 30, 40, and then 50.

we evolve, our thoughts and experience continue to evolve, we are not living life just to **** random people like animlas do.... we are animals in a sense, but we are evolving physically and mentally.

 

[teacha]

I am a younger guy (20) so my opinion on this may be biased and not based on experience, but from what I have seen in day to day life, and learned about through studying great men, I believe this to be a fact. Human's by nature are not monogaumous, men or women, All the great men that have accomplished goal's that I envy were for the most part chauvanistic and had many affairs with many women......so why is the world raised to believe we will get married and be content with one women for the rest of our live's? Besides from fvcking , most women are just a plain waste of time.....If the average male spent the time that he spends with his GF or chasing women , working on himself and his accomplishments.....well then he wouldnt have to chase shiit.....the lady's would be lining up. The reason I bring this up is because, looking back on my childhood and what I was taught, I see myself being brainfvcked into believing I should cherish a woman, when doing exactly the opposite is what make's a women cherish me, SO WHY do you think we are raised to believe these things? Is the country run by feminists? It's something ive been thinking about, Kid's are being raised to think that there testosterone and urges and pretty much everything that really define's men is bad? WTF is going on?

POOK had the same exact thought you got...I believe you should live life as you envision it and not how other people want you to live your life because ITS YOUR LIFE.

 

[bigjohnson]

I agree with this, although you'll hardly see this point of view on this forum. While I do think men are built on a primitive level to have sex with multiple women, I also think there is a natural urge to pair up at some point. I don't think the species would necessarily work as well if men didn't stay with a women long enough to build a home and help care for the family at least while the kids were growing up.

It's not just my idea, there is a ton of actual science backing this up. For instance, functional brain scans have identified at least 3 distinct structures in the human brain that cause us to tend to fixate romantically for periods of (IIRC) 1 year, 3-6 years, and >14 years, respectively.

As you point out, it makes sense that those who do this sort of behavior would have a reproductive advantage.

 

[rocksoff]

It's not just my idea, there is a ton of actual science backing this up. For instance, functional brain scans have identified at least 3 distinct structures in the human brain that cause us to tend to fixate romantically for periods of (IIRC) 1 year, 3-6 years, and >14 years, respectively.

As you point out, it makes sense that those who do this sort of behavior would have a reproductive advantage.

I don't know about about brain scans and shiit man.....but I do believe that getting married and tying yourself down to a woman can only make you weaker and less able to accomplish worthy pursuits, Imagine how you live your life when you know that every woman you see is a potential sexual conquest, a potential brand new experience to have fun with and learn about...now compare that to how you live your life when you're married and dont really have shiit to prove, youve been validated by the fact that you settled down and this girl has taken you as her "life" partner....I really do not believe that a monogomous relationship with a woman can do anything productive for yourself. Beside's having a steady flow of aassss to tap(How Long ,honestly,can one woman entertain your sexual appetite 1 maybe 2 years if shes freaky), and even this is not good for you because you should be putting the majority of your sexual energy into something better than a woman .

 

[SLY]

**** and conquer?

that's what the mongols did back in their times.

 

[prairiedog24]

I love the pop-evolutionary theory arguments flouted as proving something about human relationships when oceans of ink in psychology has discredited those ideas entirely. Funny that nature is always brought up to prove something, when even many animals mate for life. However, when making a claim about how things are NOW, it really doesn't matter if we evolved from a common single cell organism, or if we were created in Eden with fig leaves and long black hair. What matters is what humans CURRENTLY are like, and oceans of ink has been spilled concluding that:

In general, married monogamous men are happier, healthier, live longer, and are more productive than their single counterparts.

Please note that "in general" means that your Uncle Henry's tales of woe and your own "personal experiences" do not disprove the rule.

 

[rocksoff]

I love the pop-evolutionary theory arguments flouted as proving something about human relationships when oceans of ink in psychology has discredited those ideas entirely. Funny that nature is always brought up to prove something, when even many animals mate for life. However, when making a claim about how things are NOW, it really doesn't matter if we evolved from a common single cell organism, or if we were created in Eden with fig leaves and long black hair. What matters is what humans CURRENTLY are like, and oceans of ink has been spilled concluding that:

In general, married monogamous men are happier, healthier, live longer, and are more productive than their single counterparts.

Please note that "in general" means that your Uncle Henry's tales of woe and your own "personal experiences" do not disprove the rule.

It really doesnt seem that way man......when do you see lovey dovey married couple's walkin around saying how great the married life is?? fvckin never.......ocean's of ink have also shown how women have fuvcked up men's lives by leaving them and messing around after The man change's his mindset to think "alright i got a keeper better treat this girl like a princess" but when he does that the girl goes running.......................It's just a fact, even in the media you see this coming up. Tiger Wood's cheated on his wife and look what a big fvckin deal theyre making about it, hes losing sponsorships and quitting golf and blah blah....WHY? who gives a shiit if he cheated he's a sick fvcking golfer.....they try to implant in our minds "SEE WHAT HAPPENS WHEN YOU CHEAT", on the other hand a chick wants a divorce and already has a new boyfriend it's not a big fvckin deal at all.....You see, it's a feminist system passed on by old men who are whipped by their Cobweb-dry as fvck vagina wives.......the truth is that old men shouldnt be ruuuning this shiit, they should die and let youth and testoterone push us forward like it has for thousands of years

 

[prairiedog24]

It really doesnt seem that way man......

It does to me. Know a great way to test this? Go to a nursing home and talk to the guys there. They've been through life. They know the kind of stuff that will matter and the kind of stuff that will get you burned. Ask them what they regret and what they're proud of. I guarantee you you'll almost never get a "well, I wish I had just ****ed a few hundred more women, then I'd be happy."

when do you see lovey dovey married couple's walkin around saying how great the married life is??

Um, that's obvious. What do you think married people are... AFC's broadcasting every moment on facebook? The couples that DO insist on telling the world their every emotion are in trouble. The happy and functional marriages WOULD NOT act like that.

fvckin never.......ocean's of ink have also shown how women have fuvcked up men's lives by leaving them and messing around after The man change's his mindset to think "alright i got a keeper better treat this girl like a princess" but when he does that the girl goes running

and men have ****ed up women's lives yada yada yada. This isn't about the blame game. Treating a girl like a princess means nothing if you have a ho for a girl. If you make yourself a top notch person, you'll have the brains to find a top notch person.

It's just a fact, even in the media you see this coming up.

Real research... media. Real research... media. HMM, I'm persuaded!

Tiger Wood's cheated on his wife and look what a big fvckin deal theyre making about it, hes losing sponsorships and quitting golf and blah blah....WHY? who gives a shiit if he cheated he's a sick fvcking golfer.....they try to implant in our minds "SEE WHAT HAPPENS WHEN YOU CHEAT", on the other hand a chick wants a divorce and already has a new boyfriend it's not a big fvckin deal at all.....

You just used a celebrity to try to prove something about the existence of functional, or non-functional relationships. If you don't understand why this is a problem, go work on a farm in Iowa for a few years and get back to me.

You see, it's a feminist system passed on by old men who are whipped by their Cobweb-dry as fvck vagina wives.......the truth is that old men shouldnt be ruuuning this shiit, they should die and let youth and testoterone push us forward like it has for thousands of years

Well, you're eloquent, I'll give you that.

 

[bigjohnson]

....the truth is that old men shouldnt be ruuuning this shiit, they should die and let youth and testoterone push us forward like it has for thousands of years

Hahahah. Don't whip yourself into a frenzy there Jr, you'll get laid soon enough.

 

[rocksoff]

So what are the majority of married couples in the USA doing today?? Living happily ever after?? NO, waiting til theyre kid's turn 18 so they can get the fvck out...

"The divorce rate in America for first marriage, vs second or third marriage
50% percent of first marriages, 67% of second and 74% of third marriages end in divorce, according to Jennifer Baker of the Forest Institute of Professional Psychology in Springfield, Missouri.”

"According to enrichment journal on the divorce rate in America:
The divorce rate in America for first marriage is 41%
The divorce rate in America for second marriage is 60%
The divorce rate in America for third marriage is 73%"

Have fun paying 30k for your wedding,15k for your divorce and giving half of your assets to a chick guy's!!!

http://www.divorcerate.org/