It's going to be fun to see him attack the press for the prostitutes and charlatans they are. The radical left is accusing him of "rolling back free press" when all he's doing is fighting back against 18 months of lies, and threatening to sue people who have actually slandered and libeled him.I dressed as Donald Trump and walked around downtown Atlanta the Saturday night before the election, and even went to a couple strip clubs just to piss off the pimps.
If you currently have too many women chasing you, calling you, harassing you, knocking on your door at 2 o'clock in the morning... then I have the simple solution for you.
Just read my free ebook 22 Rules for Massive Success With Women and do the opposite of what I recommend.
This will quickly drive all women away from you.
And you will be able to relax and to live your life in peace and quiet.
I didn't read the article, but if it's CNN reporting 36%, it's likely to be in the ballpark range of 65%. Did they poll 120% Democrats in Southern California?http://www.cnn.com/2017/01/27/politics/trump-approval-rating-quinnipiac-poll/
36% approval rating his first week in office.
They quoted the lowest reputable poll. Two other good polls were tied and at a mid 40 number. As usual CNN is trying to manipulate your perception of reality to suit their own political bias.http://www.cnn.com/2017/01/27/politics/trump-approval-rating-quinnipiac-poll/
36% approval rating his first week in office.
I think he's about 50 also. Not all polls are as recent as Quinnipac, but the Don is now doing exactly what he promised to do during the campaign, so opinions would not drastically change within a week.Rasmussen was the one who was most correct about the election. I could see most polls being at 40, which Trump has proven that he beats by ten points. We are definitely a 50/50 country at this point.
Well CNN is as slanted as any of them, this is just not true.I didn't read the article, but if it's CNN reporting 36%, it's likely to be in the ballpark range of 65%. Did they poll 120% Democrats in Southern California?
It's kind of like how CNN reported how Hillary "won the popular" vote by 3 million, before you deduct all the illegal aliens and dead people, after which Trump probably won by 2 million.
CNN isn't great with numbers.
What isn't true?Well CNN is as slanted as any of them, this is just not true.
That Hillary didn't win the popular vote let alone lose by a few million in reality. Now that statement is slanted the other way.What isn't true?
No it isn't.That Hillary didn't win the popular vote let alone lose by a few million in reality. Now that statement is slanted the other way.