OK, so there have been plenty of 'looks' threads here lately, but I've got a slightly different questions what matters more, your 'looks' - that is, your natural and inborn attractiveness (hair, jawline, height etc.) vs. your body (muscles, toning).
Obviously the first can only be tweaked while the second can be changed dramatically with enough effort.
my question is: which matters more? and if you have one without the other can you still be considered 'good-looking'?
Obviously the first can only be tweaked while the second can be changed dramatically with enough effort.
my question is: which matters more? and if you have one without the other can you still be considered 'good-looking'?