Keep it Simple

[scholarjan]

It is depressing how some men in this forum think that their failures are attributed to messing up on some stupid PUA technique. It doesn't matter if you play ****y and funny, nor does she care if you use KINO, and any other underhanded moves to get her to appreciate you. If a girl is attracted to you within the first 10 seconds she sees you, it really doesn't matter what you do, because that desire for one another is mutual. You two will see one another like the last pieces of bacon on earth, and would be damned to lose one another. It is a matter of being at the right place at the right time, having corresponding personalities, and huge stroke of luck. The truth is AFC's get laid all the time, the so described BETAS, losers, and white knights. The majority of American men don't seem to be having as much problems as some of the men here or any other self-proclaimed seduction site. I am part of the fringe that struggles with women, and I'm not ashamed of it. I'm just at the wrong place, wrong time, and probably took a a bad series of decisions, that have landed me where I am today.

Women who have a lot of sex aren't *****s. Women who want a stable future aren't gold diggers. Women who have dreams, desires, and particular ambitions aren't *****es. They simply want to live their life in the best way possible, but they may different viewpoints in terms of achieving these things than the male populace does. Women haters are just drunk on hate, bitterness, and jealousy. If you're starved enough from sexual attention, friends, and a fulfilling life, then it is rather easy to succumb to such a negative point of view.

So many men will fix themselves up for women. They'll read up on PUA/Seduction advice and try to conquer the world for the sake of getting attention from many beautiful lasses. If you are working out, going to school, and circulating your hobbies around the prospect of getting *****, quit it or else your narcissistic empire will crumble once you come to the realization that you're not living life they way you want it to be. Do things for yourself and not for others, and eventually you'll get a joy that can't evoked by anything else.

Find your true dreams and aspirations and chase it hard. If chasing girls makes you happy and is part of your sick and twisted plot of living a fulfilling life then go ahead and be my guest, please do so.

 

[( . )( . )]

Had a feeling this post was going to be a bit blue pillish before I even read it.

Ok here goes.

It is depressing how some men in this forum think that their failures are attributed to messing up on some stupid PUA technique. It doesn't matter if you play ****y and funny, nor does she care if you use KINO, and any other underhanded moves to get her to appreciate you.

Straight out of the blocks and BOOM a mainstream shame. Game isn't "underhanded" doofus. A lifetime brainwashing of Disneyesque romantic fantasies of flowers and poems is. Btw does a chick who wears high heels or makeup also get your accusations of "underhanded"?

If a girl is attracted to you within the first 10 seconds she sees you, it really doesn't matter what you do

Wrong. Looks might get me in the door, but if I'm a timid herbivore who can't even hold her eye contact her panties are standing fast. Yes I'm fvckin gorgeous but her hamster ain't a miracle worker.

The truth is AFC's get laid all the time

Women who require a puncture repair kit don't count.

I am part of the fringe that struggles with women

You don't say?

and I'm not ashamed of it.

You should be. A wise man once told me : Puzzy is puzzy, salt is salt. If your not getting any it's your own damn fault.

Women who have a lot of sex aren't *****s.

Wrong again, already a statistical fact. As many as 6 partners sees her inability to long term pair bond increase by 70%

Women who have dreams, desires, and particular ambitions aren't *****es.

They are if those "dreams, desires and ambitions" (lol) come from sex and the city or any other (insert latest brain death prime time reality drivel). Weird how those "dreams desires and ambitions"(lol) seem to always have her ending up as a 9 to 5 cubicle drone in a non productive filler job though huh?

*YAWN*

Gender genie says your a chick btw.

 

[plate's_empty]

I thought Jan was a girls name.

 

[scholarjan]

Things aren't always black and white because we are human. Not every woman is going to be driven my mindless drivel from the mainstream media. I've met few women who were interested in respectable underground music genres and other areas of interests. Some women like taming the timid herbivore; its all a matter of personal taste. You can't assume that every young woman is going to want to be packed by a 6ft 11 uberconfident NBA player. Most men don't even fit into that category, they just rule in the supreme of being average. In fact its this "red pill," advice that has caused me to fail, it has caused so much hate and resentment towards women.

Why should I be ashamed? Its not my fault that I was at the wrong place at the time. I was completely ignorant, in regards towards the existing hookup culture because of a lack of modern figure in terms of relationships. Truth is everyone to a degree is living in an ignorant bubble. Everyone only knowns a small fraction of portion of things that needs to be known. Reducing women to an object or a mere vagina is appalling. They are creatures that are no different than I am besides one chromosome. I would not like it if a woman said the same remark, objectifying me as a success/sexual figure.

From what I understand, game is very sexist. It wants men to succeed and have sex with lots of women, and be successful in relationships. While it demoralizes and slanders women who try to do the same except for the monogamous part. Its sad how biological economics can pit one gender against the other.

I could say the same hateful things about men: they all want to live their lives in absurd, endless fornication, while keeping in mind of all the sports crap they watch. If a cubicle is all they want, then let them have their cubicle, if they find happiness in it.

You're stereotyping that's very dangerous, in a world that knows no universal absolutes.

 

[( . )( . )]

Things aren't always black and white because we are human.

What a coincidence. Was having the exact same conversation last week with a chick here about that icky "black & white" thinking. Here's what I said:

That grey area is for children,chicks and faggots. Basically anyone who doesn't have any accountability for being either right or wrong. You know how I know this? I've noticed a trend in that it's only ever leftoids who complain about "black and white" thinking.

In short NO, that fat kid shouldn't get a ribbon for participating.

Reducing women to an object or a mere vagina is appalling.

Your mistaken on what this whole "red pill" thing is about. It's basically combating the last 5 decades of reducing men to mere manginas.

From what I understand, game is very sexist.

Meh.. If it elicits tingles who gives a sh!t? But lets face it in this current culture a man breaking wind within square mile radius of a woman is "sexist".

You're stereotyping that's very dangerous in our politically correct, cultural Marxist utopia .

Fixed.

 

[Deep Dish]

scholarjan:
If a girl is attracted to you within the first 10 seconds she sees you, it really doesn’t matter what you do, because that desire for one another is mutual.

You are confused. Girls decide within a few seconds if you’re hot enough to bang, but it doesn’t end there. A girl has to “like” you and, in order for her to “like” you, you have to play game. Guys want to bang as many girls as possible, girls want to find the best man as possible, and measuring up the best man can only be accomplished through game, which takes longer than 10 seconds.

I once worked with this guy named Jake who was model quality good looking. He had no trouble with attracting women, and most would simply approach him, but Jake was probably the biggest AFC tool I’d ever met. He used to constantly complain that he couldn’t get a girlfriend or keep a girl interested in him, even though he was tapping beautiful women every other weekend. Once he opened his mouth and spilled his life story out on the restaurant table on the first date these girls would run for the hills. He literally had ONEitis for ANY girl he was dating at the time and swallowed hook, line and sinker the soul-mate mythology. He tried to be friends, tried to be sensitive, tried to be funny, tried to be savior and every other AFC technique in the book, but all this did was push these women away from him. They enjoyed being fücked by the guy, but when he started up the ice cream cones and puppy dogs, cuddle-bïtch mentality, they moved on to other guys.

http://therationalmale.com/2011/12/19/mr-perfect/​

Some women like taming the timid herbivore; its all a matter of personal taste.

No, it’s for an absence of better available options.

From what I understand, game is very sexist. It wants men to succeed and have sex with lots of women, and be successful in relationships. While it demoralizes and slanders women who try to do the same except for the monogamous part. Its sad how biological economics can pit one gender against the other.

“If the game of power is inescapable,” which it is, “better to be an artist than a denier or a bungler.”—Robert Greene

 

[Jitterbug]

What a coincidence. Was having the exact same conversation last week with a chick here about that icky "black & white" thinking.

In a similar coincidence, I was talking at a party recently and declared that people who say "there is no right or wrong" (and by people I really meant chicks and d1ckless wonder manginas, but I was in somewhat polite company) are simply terrified of being wrong and making mistakes.

Girls decide within a few seconds if you’re hot enough to bang, but it doesn’t end there.

They decide that within the first few seconds, and from then on they look hard for any reason NOT to screw you, including tests and obstacles they themselves throw in your path.

 

[LMFAO]

A woman trying to give men dating advice on women. We all know how useful such advice is.

 

[scholarjan]

Obviously women are going to have to screen men to a degree. They don't want to end up with an idiot that carries no social skills and is oblivious to it. I also find that women who do test men extensively, are low quality women who want their esteems boosted, because they are seeking value to add to their meaningless lives. These are the women that men should definitely stay away from. Women screen men, and men screen women. Albeit the rules are little different in regards of disqualifying potential lovers.

The man described above is considered to be "oversensitive," by societal standards. All I can think of is a poor fellow whom has fallen in love with these notions that do not necessarily correspond to the real world. These women simply did not have the same level interest as he did in terms of becoming monogamous. The only other case besides interest level is how he is behaving in these dates. Too clingy, and overtly passionate can seem very disgusting to a girl that merely looking for a casual first date. Those members of society whom break these rules of general consensus generally have little support and tolerance.