Just got banned from LoveShack for calling women inferior

[boilingpoint]

Hi there. So I've been posting on loveshack for the last few weeks and recently started a thread saying 'Dating is a rigged game for...chicks' where I was going on about the advantages girls have in dating and that guys should learn to hang back more etc...

The reaction was pretty fierce so I took it up a notch and said that women were 'not all that' and were basically inferior to men. There is a good reason to believe they are - men have achieved a lot more as a gender and you can't dispute the fact that everything outside was built by guys, most things invented, most famous artists, biggest companies... all guys. Anyway...

...my thread got deleted and I got banned. It was kind of a revenge on LoveShack since I took some guy's bad advice on there, when I got dumped by text by a girl (nicely). I wasn't going to reply to her dumping me by text initially but when I posted the issue on LoveShack a few guys told me to text her afterwards wishing her the best... so I did. I sent a super friendly, nice guy text basically thanking the girl for rejecting me. I only sent one text after she dumped me but pretty sure it made me look pathetic in her eyes... Bad move.

So yeah.... hi.

 

[Çharismo]

You wasted your time.

Don't waste your breath "calling" people out let alone "calling" women out. You didn't do anything big. Post less read more.

Stay the eff away from facebook. :trouble:

 

[Tictac]

Well, good.

Women are not inferior.

They are different.

 

[Peaks&Valleys]

I don't know what the other posters exact advice was, but this is an example of a way would handle any dumpee situation:

http://www.sosuave.net/forum/showthread.php?t=216695

Of course, this doesn't always mean she's going to come running back into your arms, but at least you still have your dignity in tact.

 

[boilingpoint]

Well, good.

Women are not inferior.

They are different.

Whatever you say. Anyway you can't deny I got some bad advice from there.

 

[El Payaso]

Did you by any chance mention that 80% of women are only sleeping with 20% of the male population? Just curious.

 

[boilingpoint]

Did you by any chance mention that 80% of women are only sleeping with 20% of the male population? Just curious.

haha, nah, just said that girls have it easier because guys do 95% of all the approaching, which is obviously true - I actually gave a really good argument with this saying how it is chicks who by far have the most rebound relationships whereas guys don't i.e. the reason being that if you're a guy and you just broke up you're not really in a state to approach chicks, whereas if you're a chick you get sex handed to you so it's fine.

I also said that guys should realise that girls aren't all that and should 'wise the **** up and leave those hoes to their own devices...'

 

[No.Danny]

Maybe because your wrong? Are women stupid? Absolutely, inferior? Come on man

 

[boilingpoint]

Maybe because your wrong? Are women stupid? Absolutely, inferior? Come on man

Well to be honest I was trolling a little bit with the inferior thing. I don't think women are intrinsically inferior (except in physical strength) but I do think that men as a gender has excelled more.

I also think chicks get stuff handed to them a lot more. Just my opinion.

 

[zekko]

Hi there. So I've been posting on loveshack for the last few weeks and recently started a thread saying 'Dating is a rigged game for...chicks' where I was going on about the advantages girls have in dating and that guys should learn to hang back more etc...

You probably should have just stuck to that argument instead of getting into all that business about women being inferior.

 

[boilingpoint]

This thread was posted by one of the main posters on my thread just after it got deleted. Have a look and gauge the opinions over there....

basically denial that chicks have it easier in dating and guys trying to explain away why guys get annoyed about it...

I'd post something along the lines of girls DO have it easier (no point arguing), modern feminism is just more complaining for more rights/entitlements, guys should realise this and recognise that most girls ain't really worth it so stop pursuing relentlessly.

 

[Bible_Belt]

girls DO have it easier (no point arguing)

Women can get sex easier, but that doesn't make their life easier.

Imagine if every woman in the world would have sex with you. But the catch is, every time you bang another one, every single person in your life would hate you just a little bit more: your family, friends, co-workers, everyone you know. After a few years of getting laid every weekend, everyone in the world would hate you - except the new ones who wanted to have sex with you. That's what women go through.

The problems of each respective gender are apples and oranges. Comparing them doesn't make sense. Neither is better or worse, easier or harder. They are just different.

 

[boilingpoint]

girls DO have it easier (no point arguing)

Women can get sex easier, but that doesn't make their life easier.

Imagine if every woman in the world would have sex with you. But the catch is, every time you bang another one, every single person in your life would hate you just a little bit more: your family, friends, co-workers, everyone you know. After a few years of getting laid every weekend, everyone in the world would hate you - except the new ones who wanted to have sex with you. That's what women go through.

The problems of each respective gender are apples and oranges. Comparing them doesn't make sense. Neither is better or worse, easier or harder. They are just different.

Sorry dude but this is complete nonsense. Attractive women can screw whoever they want with no repercussions at all - nothing to lose and everything to win. That's what I mean by a rigged game. It's their private life and if they get a reputation for being a slut, so what? Find new friends or continue screwing guys who come begging for more.

Note that I said attractive women - i.e. women worth dating and any woman worth dating is always hounded by guys.

That's why I began going on about why women were inferior to men, because they have more stuff handed to them, while men (unless they really are 10/10) have to work for everything.

 

[TheMonkeyKing]

chicks get stuff handed to them a lot more.

Attractive women can screw whoever they want with no repercussions at all - nothing to lose and everything to win.


So they are therefore inferior...? No offense, but your point I somewhat void of logic.

Hold yourself accountable to yourself. Ask yourself if you are man enough to say these things in a room full of women. Yes sometimes some women enjoy benefits that others don't. But try not to forget that a woman gave birth to you, you f*cking imbecile.

 

[JohnChops]

Now now fellas, no need to name call and degrade yourselves.

Women aren't inferior, other than not having that Y chromosome, we are identical in DNA structure, so if they are inferior then so are you.

 

[Between_The_Lines]

Sorry dude but this is complete nonsense. Attractive women can screw whoever they want with no repercussions at all - nothing to lose and everything to win. That's what I mean by a rigged game. It's their private life and if they get a reputation for being a slut, so what? Find new friends or continue screwing guys who come begging for more.

Note that I said attractive women - i.e. women worth dating and any woman worth dating is always hounded by guys.

That's why I began going on about why women were inferior to men, because they have more stuff handed to them, while men (unless they really are 10/10) have to work for everything.

Yes, but the bill ALWAYS arrives at some point or another. Some girls get a few years to exploit and juice the market for all its worth, others get a bit more, but they eventually have to reckon with the spirit of gravity, quite literally too (ie jowls, sagging t1ts, cottage cheese) Only so much 'work' they can employ to keep their heads above water. A man who begrudges the fact that he was to work for everything probably shouldn't refer to himself as a "man" - not in public at least.

 

[boilingpoint]

So they are therefore inferior...? No offense, but your point I somewhat void of logic.

Actually it isn't. Accepting a passive role makes you inferior because you accept it.

Anyway since you resort to abuse you obviously can't handle a normal discussion.

Now now fellas, no need to name call and degrade yourselves.

Women aren't inferior, other than not having that Y chromosome, we are identical in DNA structure, so if they are inferior then so are you.

Like I said mentally not inferior (although physically yes) and that is enough to make them inferior as they generally accept a passive/submissive role.

 

[boilingpoint]

A man who begrudges the fact that he was to work for everything probably shouldn't refer to himself as a "man" - not in public at least.

Exactly. Therefore a "man" is something that will always be superior to a "woman" because of the standards held for being a "real man."

 

[TheMonkeyKing]

Actually it isn't. Accepting a passive role makes you inferior because you accept it.

Actually it is. On the one hand, you are labelling an entire group as inferior, yet on the other, you are saying that they enjoy benefits that others do not. How is that logical?

Anyway since you resort to abuse you obviously can't handle a normal discussion.

How is calling all women inferior not abusive? Try reading up about psychological transference and projection. Your posts demonstrate both, quite transparently.

It is idiocy like this that give real men a bad rep.

 

[Between_The_Lines]

Exactly. Therefore a "man" is something that will always be superior to a "woman" because of the standards held for being a "real man."

Yeah, I should have revised that to: "A man who begrudges the fact that he has to work for everything and women don't shouldn't refer to himself as a 'man'"