this article is like listening to George Bush talk about energy efficiency while at the same time being in the back pocket of the oil companies.
while 99% of what this guy says makes sense, ultimately he's a total hypocrite. he trashes women but then talks about how he basically acts like a woman - he cheats on his woman, dominates her 'whos the boss', etc.
being a man wh*re is NOT the same as being a man. the ONLY reason this guy thinks being a man wh*re is the same as being a man is that he compares himself to weak little beta males.
real men are true to their word and don't sacrifice their principles. they dont have to 'cheat' to let a woman know that they won't be pushed around. they don't need a 'back up woman' to keep their woman in line. these are the tactics that WOMEN use to keep men in line.
but the general point of not letting a woman push you around is good. the authors means for doing so are horrible and make him just as pathetic as the beta males he criticizes.
moreover, his wife staying with him after he cheated, and even admitting that he's 'the boss' means two things:
1) she a silly little woman who has no idea what she wants and has little self respect.
2) while he thinks he's gained the upper hand on her, check back with them in 5-10 years. i guarantee that he's living in hell.
when you screw someone over, they may act like its all forgive and forget, because they, for whatever the reason, aren't strong enough to live life without you. but in the long term, don't fool yourself, at some point in life there will be a period where they have the upper hand, where they feel strong enough to make you pay, and suddenly they will turn on you and make you pay for past transgressions.
so while this article has some good points, ultimately at its core its very misguided.
