Is the ultimate outcome of Feminism the destruction of the Middle Class? (Single parent households, alimony, gangs..etc)

[Mysterious_Detective]

Hey guys,
I read the WSJ article and it seems that more wom
Hey guys,
I read the WSJ article, and it seems that more women are going to college than men. This thread is problematic since it will lead to more single-parent households. Women only want to date men equal or higher than then(education/financially..etc.) There are serious academic studies that show that when women become more educated, they even up not marrying at all.

I was discussing with a friend, and here's what we thought(Timeline):
1-Many women go to college, and many men drop out.
2-The men who dropped out end up not marrying or having children; they might work a trade. Meanwhile, educated women find it hard to find a partner.
3-The only men who end up going to college are an "Elite group" of men, usually wealthy. These men may marry foreign wives or marry the most "High Value" women from their same economic means. This thread is not uncommon, as I met a successful businessman who had a stay-at-home Vietnamese wife.
4-Some women can't find a high-value man; they end up getting pregnant by a random exciting guy.
5- This random guy is made to pay alimony and child support; he will be locked up in prison since he can't. This reality is more common than you guys think.
6-The mother, while educated, can't make enough money to support her child, so they end up living in poverty(bad neighborhood). Single-family households are a common source of poverty.
7-Having to grow up fatherless in a lousy neighborhood, boys are lead to join gangs as a scene of identity. Gang membership is closely linked to a lack of father figures and no stable homes.
8-As there are more gangs, crime increases in the neighborhood, and the city/country becomes more unstable. Formerly walkable neighborhoods become unwakable.
9-Seeing these threads, the upper class started moving to gated communities where they got away from crime and sending their children to private schools. The middle class fell more, and soon, the quality of public schools declined.
10-The lack of quality public education makes it, so it becomes increasingly difficult to achieve social mobility.

 

[Zimbabwe]

Feminism has been around for decades now and they've achieved all their major goals. Women can vote, they can work at any job their qualified for and they can demand equal pay.

But there's an interesting thing that happens to movements like feminism once they've won their battles. They don't just go away. Instead, they tend to "find new goals" to accomplish.

Thin about that for a second... because it's has some very significant implications. You've won your battles and now, instead of riding off into the sunset, you choose to keep on going.

So feminism, in order to survive, has gotten more radical. This also means that today's feminist movement attracts people (usually women) with more radical personalities.

So what we've got is an extremely radical social movement and people don't recognize it for what it is. That's because their perception of feminism is still colored by the feminism of the 60's and 70's.

Today's feminists want superiority, but they're trying to sell it as "equal rights". And nobody wants to criticize or challenge them or call their radicalism into question... because they're afraid of being labelled as a misogynist.

Sound familiar?

 

[MatureDJ]

Hey guys,
I read the WSJ article and it seems that more wom
Hey guys,
I read the WSJ article, and it seems that more women are going to college than men. This thread is problematic since it will lead to more single-parent households. Women only want to date men equal or higher than then(education/financially..etc.) There are serious academic studies that show that when women become more educated, they even up not marrying at all.

They might only want to "date" men that are at least as educated, but at the end of the day, they want a collegiate Chad's genes, and will get it either by being a cvm dumpster for one, or doing the "break for biological-clock emergency" sperm bank thing.

 

[MatureDJ]

The OP's list is pretty much the reason why human societies had figured out a long time ago that women's sexuality needed to be controlled so that the men were invested in the children. Perhaps instead of having to give out both sex & genetic progeny, women will only need to give out sex (i.e., to a Beta Stepdad).

 

[Kotaix]

Feminism has been around for decades now and they've achieved all their major goals. Women can vote, they can work at any job their qualified for and they can demand equal pay.

But there's an interesting thing that happens to movements like feminism once they've won their battles. They don't just go away. Instead, they tend to "find new goals" to accomplish.

Thin about that for a second... because it's has some very significant implications. You've won your battles and now, instead of riding off into the sunset, you choose to keep on going.

So feminism, in order to survive, has gotten more radical. This also means that today's feminist movement attracts people (usually women) with more radical personalities.

So what we've got is an extremely radical social movement and people don't recognize it for what it is. That's because their perception of feminism is still colored by the feminism of the 60's and 70's.

Today's feminists want superiority, but they're trying to sell it as "equal rights". And nobody wants to criticize or challenge them or call their radicalism into question... because they're afraid of being labelled as a misogynist.

Sound familiar?

Pretty spot on.

Modern day feminism (intersectionality, if we're being precise) is just marxism rebranded to be all about racism, and marxism always ends up with the power class having all the money and power, and everyone else scraping to get by.

War is likely coming, and the marxists will lose in the US.

 

[CAPSLOCK BANDIT]

What women want are men who are hyper masculine and hyper social status, that is what a gang is, like a gang is nothing other than a social adaptation

Anyone who knows dudes in a real gang or whatever know they get maaaaaaaaad ***** the only thing is most of them struggle to keep a roof

 

[Bible_Belt]

If drugs were legal, gangs and especially gang violence would disappear, because they would have no business to pursue and nothing to fight over. It cost more money to eat at McDonald's than to do heroin. Cheap drugs are easy money for a gang. But when the street value becomes zero, there will be no more drug dealers.