to the title question.......possibly.
I'll say this.
A man's best scenario is probably to be an employer who only hires attractive, submissive hardworking housekeepers.
Not PC to write that but....
Numerous red flags get eliminated in the reference check;
power struggle is nil-there's clear roles expectation.
Man provides room and board so he 'keeps on eye on her' and has the right(with polite notice) to investigate her room for other red flags in her lifestyle.
That thing that happens when a woman is underfoot and familiar and he will find himself attracting her because of proximity.
Remember fictional tv show 'I dream of Jeannie'?
What's imprinted at the start master/servant for lack of better terms....will continue throughout relationship.
Man tires or changes his mind with her, he gives 2 weeks notice to her.
Man wants some commitment? Well, he'll save the wages but he must be certain she idolizes him.
One idea to circumvent the emotional training of free agent non-employee women.
Employee first and build out from there.
I've been thinking of this for years. Open to learning other scenarios to dismantle women's strategies to 'get men off their game'.
I'm interested because it would be healthier to see a different society than this predominantly gynocentric one.
Speaking about my past now:
My ex told me he was thinking of me watching that movie Maudie. Weird but I get why. Asked him why didn't he just put an ad out for a housekeeper/cook that he eventually ends up in bed with. He gave me a funny look. Like he wanted to say, "but that's what I did. We met from a dating ad."
He didn't say it though. lol.
Ex was too funny. He was fun and I learned alot from him. I'll never forget he gave me the red pill. Forever grateful to be exposed to this logic
(...) some of the more insecure ones who need to see you give up on some things for her, as a true expression of your love for her.
this^