Hello Friend,

If this is your first visit to SoSuave, I would advise you to START HERE.

It will be the most efficient use of your time.

And you will learn everything you need to know to become a huge success with women.

Thank you for visiting and have a great day!

Impending Greatest Depression

Burroughs

Master Don Juan
Joined
Feb 28, 2011
Messages
2,179
Reaction score
100
Fraudulent credit and money printing system will collapse....money will be worthless, ultra elites will reduce the world to a neo-feudalist state.

Its approaching rapidly.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NUgjIcRY0Tw
 

Gaucho

Senior Don Juan
Joined
May 30, 2007
Messages
465
Reaction score
10
It won't be a depression, it will be anarchy.

Jews had the year of Jubilee once every 50 years throughout history, instead, the Western world continues to use debt to pay debt. What happens when it becomes unsustainable? The bubble bursts. Unfortunately, it's a very fine balance to get us back to equilibrium. Possible, but small odds. Unfortunately also, that the rest of the world will come down with us, despite their fiscal credibility.
 

Burroughs

Master Don Juan
Joined
Feb 28, 2011
Messages
2,179
Reaction score
100
quantitative easing is a big steaming pile of dogsh!t...

money printing continues at a rapid pace

Here's the scoop: When Fed chairman Ben Bernanke initiated the first round of Quantitative Easing (QE), the stated goal was to revive the flagging housing market by purchasing $1.25 trillion in mortgage-backed securities (MBS) from the country's biggest banks. The policy was a ripoff from the get go. No one wanted these mortgage stinkbombs that were stitched together from subprime loans to unqualified applicants. But because the banks were already busted--and because the $700 billion TARP was barely enough to keep the ventilator running until the next bailout came through-- the Fed helped to conceal its real objectives behind an elaborate PR smokescreen. In truth, the Fed must have colluded with the banks to move the toxic assets off their books (and onto the Fed's balance sheet) with the proviso that the banks withhold foreclosed homes from the market.

Sounds pretty fishy, eh?

By keeping the extra homes off-market, supply went down, demand went up (slightly), and housing showed signs of a rebound. The withholding of supply was synchronized with the Firsttime Homebuyers credit, which provided an $8,000 subsidy to new home buyers. This pumped up housing sales and further concealed what was really taking place, which was a gigantic transferal of public wealth to the banks in exchange for putrid assets that no one wanted. Naturally, the process kept the market from correcting and added vast numbers of foreclosed homes to the shadow inventory.

During this same period, the Fed worked out an agreement with Congress to pay the banks interest on the reserves it created at the banks. (Note: The MBS were exchanged for reserves) At the time, many experts questioned the wisdom of the Fed's plan saying that the reserves would not lead to another credit expansion. And they were right, too. In fact, it didn't stop the slide in housing either which resumed with gusto as soon as QE ended and the banks started dumping more foreclosed homes onto the market.

So, why would the Fed add more than a trillion dollars in reserves to the banking system if it really served no earthly purpose? Was it just so the banks would be able to earn interest on those reserves? Surely, that wouldn't be nearly enough to remove the ocean of red ink on their balance sheets. So, what was Bernanke really up to?

From sen Bernie Sander's report: "The banks pocketed interest on government securities that paid rates up to 12 times greater than the Fed’s rock bottom interest charges, according to a Congressional Research Service analysis conducted for Sanders."

Are you kidding me; 12 times more than what the Fed was getting in return?

That's larceny, my friend. Grand larceny.

More from the Sanders report: “This report confirms that ultra-low interest loans provided by the Federal Reserve during the financial crisis turned out to be direct corporate welfare to big banks,” Sanders said. “Instead of using the Fed loans to reinvest in the economy, some of the largest financial institutions in this country appear to have lent this money back to the federal government at a higher rate of interest by purchasing U.S. government securities.”

And, what they didn't lend back to Uncle Sam at a hefty rate of interest, they plunked into equities to ignite Bernanke's Stock Market Blastoff, the final phase of bubblemania.

So, let's use an analogy to explain what the Fed was doing: Imagine that you provide your son, Kirby, with a weekly allowance of $50. And Kirby--showing an uncanny aptitude for career banking--says, "Dad, I'd like to loan this money back to you at 10% per annum." Would that be a good deal for you, Dad, or would dearest Kirby be taking you to the cleaners?

That's what Bernanke was doing "at rates up to 12 times greater than the Fed’s rock bottom interest charges." So--the question is-- if Bernanke was already involved in this type of hanky-panky, what would keep him from raising the stakes a bit and really putting his friends back in the clover? Honor? Integrity?

Not likely.

What I'd like to know is whether the Fed has been creating reserves at the banks, that the banks have (then) converted into government bonds (USTs) and sold back to the Fed during QE2? In other words, is this another circular trade (like we see in the Sanders report) that's only purpose is to funnel more money to the banks?

And--if that's NOT the case-- then where did the banks come up with $600 billion in US Treasuries that they just sold to the Fed? After all, in testimony before the Financial Crisis Inquiry Commission (FCIC), Bernanke admitted that 12 of the 13 biggest banks in the country were underwater after Lehman Brothers defaulted. If that's true, then where did they get the $600 billion in Treasuries?

It's not a question of whether the Fed has been abusing its power. It's just a matter of "how much".
 

taiyuu_otoko

Master Don Juan
Joined
Jan 10, 2008
Messages
5,412
Reaction score
4,091
Location
象外
Long read, but worth it.

http://www.washingtonsblog.com/2012/08/a-matter-of-trust-part-two.html

...The American people should have been alarmed that a small group of powerful bankers designed the Federal Reserve and it was passed into law in the dead of night on December 23, 1913 with 27 Senators not even in Washington D.C. to vote on the bill. Something done this secretively never leads to a positive outcome. It is beyond question the creation of a private lender of last resort has not ended the boom and bust cycles of our economic system, but it has intensified and protracted them.

The Great Depression, which was precipitated by Federal Reserve easy money policies during the 1920s, Federal Reserve missteps in the early 1930s, and FDR driven government intervention in the markets, began in 1929 and did not truly end until 1946. The easy money Federal Reserve policies during the 1970s, along with Nixon’s closing the gold window, and commencement of our welfare/warfare state, led to a prolonged crisis from 1973 through 1982. The Federal Reserve easy money policies in the late 1990s and early 2000s, along with the repeal of Glass Steagall, belief that bankers could be trusted to regulate themselves, and capture of regulators, rating agencies, and politicians by Wall Street, has led to two prolonged epic busts between 1999 and 2009, with the biggest bust still coming down the track. Putting our trust in a secretive society of bankers has worked out exactly as expected, with bankers and their cronies becoming obscenely wealthy, while the average person has seen 96% of their purchasing power inflated away since the Federal Reserve’s inception.
 

Peace and Quiet

If you currently have too many women chasing you, calling you, harassing you, knocking on your door at 2 o'clock in the morning... then I have the simple solution for you.

Just read my free ebook 22 Rules for Massive Success With Women and do the opposite of what I recommend.

This will quickly drive all women away from you.

And you will be able to relax and to live your life in peace and quiet.

Burroughs

Master Don Juan
Joined
Feb 28, 2011
Messages
2,179
Reaction score
100
good article otoko

"“It is well enough that people of the nation do not understand our banking and monetary system, for if they did, I believe there would be a revolution before tomorrow morning.” – Henry Ford

Henry Ford made this statement decades before the debasement of our currency entered overdrive. The facts reflected in the chart above should have provoked a revolution, but the ruling class has done a magnificent job of ensuring the mathematical ignorance of the masses through government education, mass media propaganda, and statistical manipulation of inflation data to obscure the truth. Mainstream economists have successfully convinced the average American that inflation is good for their lives and deflation is dangerous to their wellbeing. There are economists like Kindleberger, Shiller and Roubini who have brilliantly documented and predicted various bubbles, despite being scorned a ridiculed by the captured mouthpieces for the oligarchs. But even these fine men have a flaw in their thinking. They can see speculative manias spurred by irrational beliefs and delusional thinking, but are blind to the evil manipulations of bankers, politicians, and corporate titans. They believe that humans with Ivy League educations can outsmart markets and through the fine tuning of interest rates, manipulation of the money supply and provision of liquidity through a lender of last resort, can control the financial system and avoid panics."
 

Burroughs

Master Don Juan
Joined
Feb 28, 2011
Messages
2,179
Reaction score
100
the people are getting angry

http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/headlin...mannequins-hanging-from-las-vegas-billboards/

and with good reason

Quantitative easing is nothing more than a euphemism for printing money out of thin air. Its one-and-only purpose is to destroy the currency being printed. It is pure dilution and absolutely no different than a corporation vowing to improve its fiscal performance simply by printing a lot of new shares.

We can illustrate the inherently evil nature of this monetary abomination by working through the "mechanics" of this policy. First, the explicit goal of QE2 is to increase inflation. By now, all readers should be familiar enough about "inflation" to know that it is literally nothing more than the speed with which our currencies are being destroyed.

In the case of the Federal Reserve, we understand all too well how "successful" it has been in creating inflation. Since it was invented in 1913, the Federal Reserve has been directly responsible for the U.S. dollar losing 97% of its value (i.e. inflation has raised prices by more than 20 times what they were in 1913) -- despite the official mandate of the Federal Reserve for "price stability" (i.e. protecting the dollar). Now, Ben Bernanke is vowing to "succeed" in destroying the remaining 3% of value of the world's reserve currency.

Here is how printing money accomplishes Bernanke's "goal." First of all, as with any kind of dilution, printing new dollars makes all of the "old" dollars worthless. So, right there, the Federal Reserve is already 100% guaranteed of "success. In fact, the Federal Reserve has already been "very successful" in creating inflation -- in the real world.

Visit Shadowstats.com, operated by respected U.S. economist John Williams, and you will hear that U.S. inflation has been in the range of 8.5% - 9.5% all this year. Williams performs his calculations using the exact same methodology used by the U.S. government a generation ago, before the U.S. government intentionally incorporated various statistical lies into this measurement.

Understand the enormous "rewards" which a government receives for lying, by grossly under-stating the rate of inflation. Payouts on $100's of billions of U.S. government benefits per year are indexed to the rate of "official" inflation. By grossly understating inflation (and cheating all of the recipients of those benefits), the U.S. government can get an instant, multibillion dollar windfall from that one lie, alone (every year).

Secondly, every quarterly and annual GDP report must be "deflated" by the real rate of inflation. The raw data must be stripped of all inflation, in order to accurately represent real, economic growth. By grossly understating the rate of inflation, the government falsely inflates the rate of GDP "growth" by several percentage points -- et voila we have a "U.S. economic recovery."

Immediately, we see Bernanke exposed for the charlatan that he is. He claims there is U.S. "economic growth," when all that "growth" actually represents is an illusion of doctored numbers. He claims the Federal Reserve has "failed" to create enough inflation (i.e. to destroy the U.S. dollar fast enough), when in fact the real data shows that Bernanke has been doing a wonderful job of destroying the dollar.

However, the ultimate "indictment" of "QE2" as failed policy comes from the fact that "QE1" never ended. Of all the fraudulent shams perpetrated by the U.S. government and the Federal Reserve, none of them are as obvious as the U.S. government's manipulation of the market for U.S. Treasuries.

Here are the facts. Previously, the U.S. government was able to find (real) buyers for its Treasuries, due to the need of other governments to recirculate/reinvest the money from their trade surpluses and fiscal surpluses. Thanks to the Wall Street-engineered "Crash of '08," the vast majority of those surpluses have disappeared.

At the same time, the U.S. government is cranking out much more "supply" than at any other time in the history of the United States. Thus, we are told by the U.S. government (and the Federal Reserve) that there are more "buyers" for U.S. Treasuries than at any time in history -- despite the fact those buyers have no money. But that is literally less than half of this farce.

Not only are we being told that buyers-with-no-money are purchasing more Treasuries than at any other time in history, we're also told that these buyers are joyfully paying the highest prices in history (by a large margin) for these debt instruments. However this still doesn't capture the absurdity of this scenario.

Buyers-with-no-money are (supposedly) buying far more Treasuries than at any time in history, at the highest prices (by far) -- while publicly, all of these "buyers" are expressing severe doubts about the creditworthiness of the U.S. (i.e. its ability to ever make good on this $trillions in new bond debt). Would any sane individual buy the greatest quantity of anything (at the highest prices in history), while publicly expressing severe doubts about the value/quality of that good?

Don't answer that question yet. Since "quantitative easing" must (and does) destroy the value of a currency, for every 1% the dollar loses in value, all of those $trillions in U.S. Treasuries (which are denominated in U.S. dollars) lose the same amount of their own value.

Thus, with U.S. bond-prices at their highest level in history (and at their maximum, theoretical price), it is 100% inevitable that those prices can only fall. This means that buyers-with-no-money are supposedly buying the most "supply" of Treasuries in history, at the highest prices in history - while being 100% certain of losing money on those Treasuries due to their inevitable fall in price and the loss of value of the U.S. dollar. Clearly, there are few buyers for U.S. Treasuries. Instead, "The Three Amigos" of debt (the U.S., UK and Japan) are playing the bond-market equivalent of musical chairs. The UK "buys" U.S. Treasuries, Japan buys UK debt, and the U.S. government buys Japanese bonds -- and all with the "quantitative easing" funny-money they are printing out of thin air. Then all three governments pretend their bond-auctions are "covered."

This brings us to the final element of this charade: U.S. bond market "auctions." At the same time that the U.S. government reported the "economic miracle" of buyers-with-no-money buying more of something they don't want (at the highest prices), just so they can lose money, the U.S. government removed all "transparency" from these bond-auctions. Even bond traders with decades of experience report that they have no idea of who is actually buying these bonds. This is like an amateur magician who is so clumsy in performing his magic that he needs to turn out the lights while executing his tricks so that the audience doesn't immediately spot the ineptitude of his fraud.

Why has the Federal Reserve been so adamant about fraudulently concealing its actions in the U.S. bond-market, and the quantitative easing that makes that fraud possible? First, in printing up money, but not acknowledging it, the Federal Reserve is literally counterfeiting trillions of dollars of U.S. currency.

Should that fact be discovered, not only would the U.S. dollar immediately collapse in value (even more than the Fed wants it to), but asset prices for all U.S. debt (and all U.S. banker-paper) would immediately collapse.

Since a fall in bond prices is exactly the same thing as an increase in bond interest rates, discovery of the Fed's counterfeiting would cause U.S. interest rates to skyrocket, squashing all remaining life out of the U.S. economy, and bankrupting the U.S. government (through much, much higher interest payments on its $trillions in debt) in a matter of months.

With the obvious fact that the U.S. government never stopped its quantitative easing, this brings us to the current scenario. The entire reason why the Fed is "announcing" something which it is already doing is because even doctored U.S. government statistics can't hide the fact that the U.S. economy is once again collapsing.

Obviously, quantitative easing is not, does not, and cannot "fix" any of the U.S. economy's problems, which (ironically) have all been caused by too much new debt, and new money-printing. So why is the Fed "coming out of the closet" (even just temporarily)?

Simply, with the intensifying weakness of the U.S. economy, the Federal Reserve (and the U.S. government) feel an intense need to be seen to be "doing something" (even something it was already doing) -- and neither the U.S. government nor the Fed have any other ideas.
 

Burroughs

Master Don Juan
Joined
Feb 28, 2011
Messages
2,179
Reaction score
100

Poonani Maker

Master Don Juan
Joined
Apr 29, 2007
Messages
4,407
Reaction score
929
http://finance.yahoo.com/q/ks?s=FMCC+Key+Statistics

Can anyone tell me how FMCC (freddie mac) can still be in business and the CFO, etc still make 3 million a year??? when Freddie Mac's debt is 2.05 TRILLION with 105 Billion cash and debt to equity ratio 188,829%!!!?? I've never seen a d/e ratio that high! god damn

Should we be salivating at the chops on this or shall we stick a fork in her?
 
Top