How I've (Jokingly) Told Women They Owe Men.

A-Unit

Master Don Juan
Joined
Aug 6, 2004
Messages
1,515
Reaction score
43
Aside from the "rib" comments noted in the bible, many women use the gift of birth as a sense of entitlement. By all means, congratulations! Lord knows I can't, and wouldn't, want to give birth. Being a man, I like sticking my prick in various holes, it's like the little boy who enjoys playing with things to see the results.

I'm by no means a misogynist. I love women. My own mother is incredible, independent, self-sufficient, strong, family-oriented, a nurse, useful, resourceful, but still acts like a 'woman.' My father was kind of that leather-jacket-wearing, smoking bad guy who went to a catholic school. Never did drugs in his life, but always stood on the edge of being an a-hole, being political, but most importantly being honest.

However, too often women neglect a few things about life...

"Honey, you might get prego from 1 man, who may or may not be your bf, husband, lover, cousin, or brother, but tell me WHILE you're prego with whoever's baby, who's protecting you? Who's providing you with shelter? Who's providing you with food? Who's providing the healthcare for you and your baby? Who's protecting you from men who would otherwise harass you? Who's protecting you at night in dark alleys, and dark bars, when you're vulenerable?"

Look over history, men are the doers, the resourceful species, this doesn't mean we're BETTER. The beauty in the world, the whole world which is feminine in its essence is what makes things worth doing. I heard a great line by...Chris Rock, or Tucker, or some such comedian, who said God would most likely be a woman based on what's beautiful, versus what men would consider beautiful and true. Not that I know, but that makes alot of sense. Sunrises when playing golf. The pristine serenity of a ski slope and sprawling mountains. The beaches of the world. Even a great and beautiful woman naked.

Women CAN represent all that's beautiful in this world, but like most people, we/they/us have all lost our way. No sex is above the other. The unfortunate wars we've fought have been fought by sons birthed women, and then fought by men who've protected something again, for something of beauty. In many cases, it was freedom. Alot of kingdoms are fought for beauty, riches, greed, but riches only present a means of getting more of something, which ends up as normally, more pvssy.

And men are at fault as much as women, because our air of supremacy by no means grants us a superior position. Sure, we've done ALOT. We still do ALOT. But most guys want to ANYWAYS. Most guys want to dump tons of dough into women, Lord knows we don't use it, and we only earn it to prove we CAN earn it, not that we need. Give us our toys, let us play with them, and we'll SHARE the rest. (Remember, boys were taught to share more of their toys in the sandbox than girls?) It's when a guy dumps tons of dough into a woman THINKING she owes him something, or expecting a RETURN on that dough. It should be PRESUMED by women that men do alot, just as women CAN do alot, too.

Many girls HATE working, whereas men are naturally INCLINED to work, tinker, invent, control, lead, manage, think, direct, and so on. We don't mind it. We'd go nuts. Many girls straight out of college take crap jobs for mediocre pay just to have a job, make a living, then AWAIT a prince who will knock them up, and keep them home. And if they don't mention it upfront, most of them will when they're living with you, or find a way to "make it happen." WE BOTH owe each other, and BOTH give to each other something we BOTH desire, UNFORTUNATELY we've not come to APPRECIATE each other and ourselves. We're so focused on..."Show me the money" that we don't pony up any investment first. That's not quite what leadership is. That's not quite being a man, or taking a risk, or going first. Leadership involves risk. It means being on the front line, in ALL RESPECTS, not just inventing, or talking, but in thinking and feeling. It means saying things to someone, if both of you are thinking it, and doing it first. It means doing the hard thing, like bringing up a tough conversation, but doing it anyways.

Believe it or not, the COOL AND COLLECTED mentality of laying back and having chicks come to you DOES NOT WORK. Sure, Mystery's Club skits work IN clubs, IN GROUPS, but if you've got a girl one on one, she wants to be wanted and she WANTS to hear it. Maybe not off the bat, and maybe not 1000 times a day, BUT she wants to hear it. Women aren't entirely built to be hyper aggressive, and if they are, MOST times they will default to a guy MORE aggressive than them anyways. They're going to look UP, not down. I'm more impressed by a guy who can walk up to a girl, as her out, tell her he likes her, or ask to bang her, than one who WAITS and sees what happens. Put it out there, if she drops the ball and rejects you, MOVE ON. There's plenty more, but at LEAST you made a play, at least you worked your hand, you made a big, you got IN the game. Now you're a player. In the metaphorical AND the literal sense.

I jokingly tell women they own men because they forget what we've done to get here. Sure, we've been part of the wars, and scandals, and tragedies, BUT also, we help, assist, protect, and provide women on the very mundane tasks. Getting resources. Fixing the home up (non-decorating tasks). Protecting her during pregnancy (there are things women can't do, or men do better, just like there's things women do better). This mentality of hate, or pissed offness (making words up, HUZZAH), disgust, anger, frustration, ONLY infects you. It only infects the BUCKET it's contained within. And unfortunately, it only hurts your chances of finding/attracting the girl/woman/friends who actually are what you'd like. It doesn't take 100 friends, or 100 women to confirm your findings in the case of love, companionship, and friendship, it only takes one, regardless of your basis or belief.

As funny as it is to go back n forth on who tops who, we both need each other. Sure, sports accomplishments are great, and we do that for us, but some of the greatest things men have also done have been done for children, or for women, for mothers, grandmothers, aunts, and so on. and make it worth doing for them. There's something they "represent", just like there's something WE represent, which is why women do things for us. Because they want to, and, because they want to GET something out of it.

Just because things have happened long ago...doesn't make them right. Just because we've always fought in wars, or over resources, or allowed people to kill people in the thousands and millions, doesn't make it right, or genetically embedded in us. If anything, we should look over history and go..."whatever the heck we're doing, hasn't worked, so maybe we should find a way to get along." We ALL share this planet. People born on it, messed up or not, don't ask to be born, even if it's a broken condom moment, so we ALL get along, or should. Within various systems, people can claim their right to supremacy. Because we use a capitalistic system, and believe its the best, it works for some, and for those who are good inside of it, they claim it to be best and most fair. However, in other systems, different people rule and win out. It isn't the best, it's what seems fair given what we believe.

HOWEVER, I find it hard to claim we know much when, we're trying observe this hamster's cage we find ourselves in. It's like trying to conduct a science experiment inside of a fish bowl, as fish, that we don't know we're in with equipment we really don't know how to use. Here we are, in life, claiming we KNOW things, using equipment, namely our brains, we don't really use properly or know how to use, to observe and say THIS IS WHAT's right an THIS IS WHAT's wrong. Doesn't that make us a little crazy?



A-Unit
 

Pimp101

Don Juan
Joined
Oct 27, 2005
Messages
116
Reaction score
2
Age
38
Location
London
We're all a little crazy.

Check out the symptoms of schizophrenia and you'll find that you, and everyone around you exhibits at least some of them.

http://www.schizophrenia.com/diag.php#common

Sh!t, even applying DJ principals to this suggests that a DJ is insane. For example,

"Delusions of grandeur - for example when you believe that you are very special or have special powers or abilities. An example of a grandiouse delusion is thinking you are a famous rock star."

Doesn't every DJ believe that he is special? Isn't that what MAKES us special?

Or how about applying this to a religious man;

"Delusions of reference - when things in the environment seem to be directly related to you even though they are not. For example it may seem as if people are talking about you or special personal messages are being communicated to you through the TV, radio, or other media."

A big part of spirituality for a lot of people is seeing signs in everyday things that most people miss, and by that definition this is also insane.

Lets move on to AFC's;

"Affective flattening is the reduction in the range and intensity of emotional expression, including facial expression, voice tone, eye contact (person seems to stare, doesn't maintain eye contact in a normal process), and is not able to interpret body language nor use appropriate body language."

Sounds like just about every person with a lack of social skills to me, who apparently are insane too.

Yet more:

"Inability to make friends or keep friends, or not caring to have friends"

^ AFC, DJ

I'm honestly starting to believe that being slightly insane is normal for humans. After all, if perception is reality and everyone has a different perception, who's to say whats real? At best our view of whats normal is just a rough guideline in an attempt to homogenize a society of minds.

Its interesting to take a step back and look at the bigger picture in how social norms differ from region to region, country to country, continent to continent. This inherit variance of whats normal really should be clueing us into the fact that we're all unique by design. Maybe people sitting in mental wards are really just as sane as us, maybe they just don't consent to the guidelines of whats real and whats normal.
 
Top