Homo Quotas - Wave of the Future

[Bible_Belt]

Federal agencies, organizations such as the National Football League and more than one-third of Fortune 500 companies are now trying to expand their vendor pools by explicitly encouraging bids from gay, lesbian and transgender contractors.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/natio...e3ea7e-92a0-11e4-a66f-0ca5037a597d_story.html

 

[Stagger Lee]

The governments in western countries seem intent on promoting homos and economically opposing heteros and families to decrease the birthrate further and fill western countries with foreign ethnics and muslims. People needs to start seeing what it's really all about and take back their governments.

Public agencies are prohibited under California law from using race, sex or ethnicity in the awarding of contracts, and the new law does not create any preferences or set-asides for LGBT-owned enterprises. Instead, state regulators will soon consider whether to set voluntary percentage targets for utilities such as Verizon, Pacific Gas & Electric and AT&T to meet.

Does that tactic sounds familiar? The leftist controlling the government can't just come out and admit they are creating laws or regulations favoring/disfavoring individuals based on race, sex, ethnicity, sexual orientation etc. That would be easy to point out as unconstitutional and reversed. Instead, just like the government's PC policy, it pressures industry to enforce these policies voluntarily. If you're not the right sex, ethnicity, orientation or don't use only pc speech, then you're economically (and politically) blacklisted.

 

[( . )( . )]

The governments in western countries seem intent on promoting homos and economically opposing heteros and families to decrease the birthrate further and fill western countries with foreign ethnics and muslims. People needs to start seeing what it's really all about and take back their governments.

No more needs to be said really. That right there is the end game of all this. The re-engineers behind the continual promotion of Western decay and deviancy could give a flying fvck about the validity of all these Gay Lettuce Bacon Tomato movements sweeping through Western (and only Western) countries. As a matter of fact I'd bet the majority of them are as repulsed as the rest of us and probably pissing themselves laughing at their handiwork behind closed doors.

Apart from the real agenda of all this promotion of poz, that being another tool used to destroy the family structure of the middle class host population. Here's some fun facts:

Gay, bisexual, and other men who have sex with men (MSM) represent approximately 2% of the US population, yet are the population most severely affected by HIV. In 2009, MSM accounted for 61% of all new HIV infections, and MSM with a history of injection drug use (MSM-IDU) accounted for an additional 3% of new infections. That same year, young MSM accounted for 69% of new HIV infections among persons aged 13–29 and 44% of infections among all MSM. At the end of 2009, an estimated 441,669 (56%) persons living with an HIV diagnosis in the US were MSM or MSM-IDU.

http://www.cdc.gov/hiv/risk/gender/msm/index.html HIV Among Gay and Bisexual Men

"Prior to the AIDS epidemic, a 1978 study found that 75 percent of white, gay males claimed to have had more than 100 lifetime male sex partners: 15 percent claimed 100-249 sex partners; 17 percent claimed 250-499; 15 percent claimed 500- 999; and 28 percent claimed more than 1,000 lifetime male sex partners. Levels of promiscuity subsequently declined, but some observers are concerned that promiscuity is again approaching the levels of the 1970s. The medical consequence of this promiscuity is that gays have a greatly increased likelihood of contracting HIV/AIDS, syphilis and other STDs."

In other words Seventy-five percent of gay men have had more than a hundred sex partners, and nearly a third have had more than a thousand.

http://www.answers.com/Q/What_is_the_average_number_of_sex_partners_a_gay_man_has_in_a_lifetime John R. Diggs, Jr. M.D.

I estimate I've had approximately 3,000 men up my butt ... I estimate that I went to the baths at least once a week, sometimes twice, and that each time I went I had a minimum of four patners ... I also racked up about three men a week for five years at the Christopher Steet bookstore ...Then of course there was the MineShaft; the orgies; the 55th Street Playhouse; the International Stud backroom ...

Let me present my own history of STDs. From 1973, when I came out, to 1975, I only got mononucloeosis and non-specific urethritis, or NSU. In 1975, I got my first case of gonorrhea. Not bad, I thought. I'd had maybe 200 different partners, and I'd only gotten the clap twice. But then, moving from Boston to New York City, it all began to snowball.

First came hepatitis A in '76 and more gonorrhea and NSU. In 1977, I was diagnosed with amebiasis, an intestinal parasite, hepatitis B, more gonorrhea, and NSU. In 1978, more amebiasis and my first case of shigella, and of course, more gonorrhea. Then in 1979, hepatitis yet a third time, this time non-A, non-B, more intestinal parasites, adding giardia this time, and an anal fissure as well as my first case of syphilis ... By 1981, I got some combination of STDs each and every time I had sex ...

At age twenty-seven I've had: gonorrhea, syphillis, hepatitis A, hepatitis B, and hepatitis non-A, non-B; intestinal parasites including amebiasis, e. historicia, shigella, giardia; herpes simplex types one and two; venereal warts, mononucleosis, cytomegalovirus, and now cryptosporodiosis, for which there is no known cure.

http://www.2blowhards.com/archives/2007/02/aids_and_immune.html


JUST LIKE YOU AND ME BIGOTS!! :cuss: SCREW YOU AND YOUR HETERONORMATIVE CIS FAMILY STRUCTURES DAD !! WOW JUST WOW, YOU'RE SUCH A SQUARE !!

 

[jimjam]

Read 1984. In Orwell's vision the orgasm was all but eliminated and homosexuality was encouraged. Looks like we're there. On many levels. Scary.....

 

[user43770]

Well, what steps can we take as heterosexual men to counter this? Are we relegated to posting about it on internet forums?

 

[zekko]

Where I work, gay people are more likely to be promoted, and less likely to be terminated. Some have been hired in at higher pay rates than other employees. You probably wouldn't believe some of the things that gay people have done at work and not been fired. They are protected.

 

[dasein]

Well, what steps can we take as heterosexual men to counter this? Are we relegated to posting about it on internet forums?

Work towards starting your own gig if at all possible and use mostly if not all contractors. Make sure they are true contractors who have other customers, not just you, and that you aren't directing them much in the performance of the work, just providing specs, deadlines and such.

I have been thinking about a black box investment strategy for buying puts on overly PC, affirmative action companies in heavy competition with less burdened companies. This would be quite complicated to set up, with many variables, but doable in the net age. If we are right and they are wrong, there should be a pricing inefficiency to capture.

 

[Stagger Lee]

Where I work, gay people are more likely to be promoted, and less likely to be terminated. Some have been hired in at higher pay rates than other employees. You probably wouldn't believe some of the things that gay people have done at work and not been fired. They are protected.

And the same privileges apply to females and ethnics. We really need to do something about this blatant, institutionalized discrimination against hetero American males. One thing is we need to vote against liberals and hold so-called conservatives' feet to the fire on these issues.

 

[speed dawg]

Well, what steps can we take as heterosexual men to counter this? Are we relegated to posting about it on internet forums?

I started a thread about this a few weeks ago, and nobody responded. Just proved to me that maybe the problem isn't as big as we think, since no one is motivated to do anything about it.

And the same privileges apply to females and ethnics. We really need to do something about this blatant, institutionalized discrimination against hetero American males. One thing is we need to vote against liberals and hold so-called conservatives' feet to the fire on these issues.

Agree, those two things are first and foremost. Vote the most conservative guy in (within obvious reason), and then get involved with them, although I'm not sure how much a phone call to a congressman actually helps.

I personally do not associate with any business owner that I do not agree with on my main principles, unless they absolutely earn it through unquestioned merit and provide me obvious value. That is all I can do. That goes for church, work, hobbies, etc.

 

[Stagger Lee]

I started a thread about this a few weeks ago, and nobody responded. Just proved to me that maybe the problem isn't as big as we think, since no one is motivated to do anything about it.

I see it as a three step process, 1. Awareness 2. Spread awareness 3. Concrete Action. We have the first two especially the awareness though spreading awareness is somewhat lacking, but action is definitely lacking.

Agree, those two things are first and foremost. Vote the most conservative guy in (within obvious reason), and then get involved with them, although I'm not sure how much a phone call to a congressman actually helps.

I personally do not associate with any business owner that I do not agree with on my main principles, unless they absolutely earn it through unquestioned merit and provide me obvious value. That is all I can do. That goes for church, work, hobbies, etc.

What we really need is a new 3rd party, as the conservatives/Republicans are no real friend of American males. But a 3rd party is too ambitious and would just take votes from the Republican candidates and help the liberals. So I think the best we can do for now is to vote conservative and try to hold them to the fire. Ideally we'd become more active and organize and infiltrate and push both parties to the right and away from cultural Marxism. Cultural Marxist sure have been pushing both parties to the left.

 

[dasein]

It is getting better due to the internet. Just go on youtube and search "feminism," there are videos after videos with high views railing on feminism, many posted by women. Other videos highlighting the excesses and hypocrisy of feminist behavior, that would NEVER get a MSM treatment, are being broadcast on youtube and elsewhere, also with high views. Things are still bad in many respects, but many here may not remember the heyday of feminism in the 90s where we had completely fabricated "repressed memory" of abuse and "satanic ritual abuse" feminist orchestated scams at epidemic proportions, no internet, and a MSM blaring out the feminist lie narratives unquestioned as gospel 24-7 with no counterpoint whatsoever.

Unfortunately, the change will have to come mostly from women IMO. As women make more money, own more businesses, raise male children, many are starting to question the leftism that has held a supermajority of women captive for 40 years. The left holds a strong skew of single female voters, 65-70%. If that skew reduces a mere 10%, to 55% or so, the left will have extreme political problems, doesn't have to be some massive exodus from the left, just a little. This is why they must preach lie narratives like "war on women," "rape and abuse culture," "pay gap," "glass ceiling." Their ads in every jurisdiction in the 2014 that I saw were filled with these themes as if male voters didn't even exist. It didn't work out too well, the left got whupped, signaling that the feminist nonsense may finally be wearing thin, and is beginning to create a very solid antileft male skew to boot.

Same thing with minorities. As more and more blacks, Hispanics and Asians achieve the upper and upper middle classes, leftist voting skews will reduce. Again, the net is hastening this.

Takeaway is that there's not much we can do other than raise awareness and repudiate feminism/leftism publicly and rationally when given the chance, but there are other cultural factors brewing that will likely offer significant help.

 

[Stagger Lee]

Same thing with minorities. As more and more blacks, Hispanics and Asians achieve the upper and upper middle classes, leftist voting skews will reduce. Again, the net is hastening this.

I have to disagree that this is happening though. Asian have been more financially successful than whites in the US but have increasingly voted more toward Democrats. Blacks and Hispanics also seem to be skewing to the left. As the population of younger Asian and Hispanics increases there's more liberal voters in these groups.

The political consensus for their support of liberals is because they perceive liberals as more supportive of immigration and minorities in general. This perception is probably true. Liberals are more anti-white than conservatives. This is probably a main motivation for the insane immigration levels liberals support-more voters.

One of the more surprising voting trends in American politics over the past two decades is the dramatic shift of Asian Americans toward the Democratic Party. Only 31% of the Asian American electorate voted for Bill Clinton in 1992, but 73% supported Barack Obama in 2012. What accounts for this change?

The professors reject a variety of explanations that have recently been offered...

Rather, say the professors, there are a cluster of “push and pull” factors that seem to be drawing Asian Americans towards the Democrats and away from the Republicans. Some of the pull factors: Asian Americans like President Obama’s policies on health care, education, and the Iraq War. They also appreciate that Obama has appointed a record number of Asian Americans to high office, including such nominations as Goodwin Liu for the U.S. Court of Appeals, Jim Yong Kim as head of the World Bank, and Steven Chu as Secretary of Energy. Those appointments have received a great deal of attention in Asian American media outlets.

As for the “push factors”: well, the Republican’s anti-immigrant bias and its alliance with the Christian right are not doing them any favors so far as Asian Americans are concerned.

 

[dasein]

I have to disagree that this is happening though. Asian have been more financially successful than whites in the US but have increasingly voted more toward Democrats. Blacks and Hispanics also seem to be skewing to the left. As the population of younger Asian and Hispanics increases there's more liberal voters in these groups.

The political consensus for their support of liberals is because they perceive liberals as more supportive of immigration and minorities in general. This perception is probably true. Liberals are more anti-white than conservatives. This is probably a main motivation for the insane immigration levels liberals support-more voters.

I agree with all this in the now. But remember, the Democrats get the callow youth vote, and the mainstream medical/scientific wave of Asians is still relatively young. Romney and Mc Cain had the hawk by association problem due to Iraq, which turns off younger voters. There will be no such encumbrance in 2016. Still believe in time, as they mature and develop more Asian owned medical and other mainstream businesses, they will tend to move away from the left. One factor your point caused me to consider, though, is that there are many Asians employed in academia now, and that skews left too. They are a small demographic, though, and it will be interesting to see how it turns out.