Home or Gym?

Dj Tiesto

Don Juan
Joined
Oct 26, 2003
Messages
82
Reaction score
0
Location
Canada
Hey.
There was a similar post about this matter but it went slightly off topic...

I REALLY want to get in shape.

The thing is that I got a set of dumbells, a mat, access for a swimming pool and Men's Health mags....

My question is:

Can u get some significant results and changes by exercisng at home with this equipment and doing cardio. (swimming)

My goal is to gain muscle mass and hopefully a six pack by the end of the year. The will is definitely there...

Gym is kind of expensive and not that close to my home. Plus, I will habe to go solo which didn't really work in the past...

Any advice would be greatly appreciated.
I really have to start something...
 

Dj Tiesto

Don Juan
Joined
Oct 26, 2003
Messages
82
Reaction score
0
Location
Canada
Hey.

20 pounds each+ can buy additional weight in wal-mart.

I think just about enough for me.
Curls are pretty easy to do.
But stuff like hummer curls, triceps extension or front raise can be done in 7-8 reps with this weight. So I guess it is ok. I can also buy a barbell.

The question is, if it will show some good results. Plus there is the fact that I want to concentrate more on my abs.
So will crunches and related exercises can get me a six pack if done regulary (3 times a week) + I'm ready to diet.
 

Warlock

Don Juan
Joined
Sep 1, 2003
Messages
27
Reaction score
0
I don't know if you trying to gain or lose weight, but your diet is equally important with your work out. Heavy and hard is good for muscle strength..not necessarily muscle size. Drop it down a notch and do it slower, you will *definately* feel it.

Walmart has a Gold's Gym bench for under $100. Bench, pull downs, legs. Theres a cheaper model, but go with the Gold's.

If your serious head over here . Stick with it, you'll see results.
 
Joined
Dec 14, 2003
Messages
293
Reaction score
0
Location
kingdom of latveria, central europe
Originally posted by Dj Tiesto
Hey.
There was a similar post about this matter but it went slightly off topic...

I REALLY want to get in shape.


we'll see.



My question is:

Can u get some significant results and changes by exercisng at home with this equipment and doing cardio. (swimming)
you may lose fat with the swimming and a good cutting diet, but you're not going to gain any serious mass.

My goal is to gain muscle mass and hopefully a six pack by the end of the year. The will is definitely there...
No it isn't. Look at your next statement.

Gym is kind of expensive and not that close to my home. Plus, I will habe to go solo which didn't really work in the past...
If your will is really there, then the above are nothing but bullshyt, lame excuses. YOU DO WHATEVER THE FUKK YOU HAVE TO DO TO ACHIEVE YOUR GOALS. That's the main difference between the winners and losers in life. You get a loan from your parents, you get a job to pay for gym dues, you find the motivation to go by yourself to the gym. In short, you sound fukkin soft to me.

Any advice would be greatly appreciated.
I really have to start something...
Join a real gym and stop making excuses for yourself.
 

Dj Tiesto

Don Juan
Joined
Oct 26, 2003
Messages
82
Reaction score
0
Location
Canada
Ok.
I wanna explain one thing.

The fact that I'm not obsessed about exercising, doesn't mean that I'm not willing to do it.

But yeah, I'm not 100% commited as well and it is something that I was planning for YEARS. Its just never worked out.

I mean I can afford the gym. I'm working and got a loan from the bank. It is just that its sux cuz it takes 20 mins to get to the gym and I have no ride and this time of season, the temperature with the windchill can get to around -40c (-6 F) SO its very unpleasnt.

I guess if I was more motivated, it wouldn't create an obstacle.

So if its possible to do it in a home environment, why not?
It is easier. But I'm still not rulling out the gym, so that's why I'm asking If a home workout can measure up to a gym workout...
 

Warlock

Don Juan
Joined
Sep 1, 2003
Messages
27
Reaction score
0
This is what I did... start small, if you can stick with the routine you can put more money and time into getting into shape. You'll either like it or hate it. Idealy you get to the point where you can't live without it ;)

As to not stray off topic.. you ask "Can u get some significant results and changes by exercisng at home?" the answer is yes. Start with simple stuff, situps, push-ups, dips.. you can do that tommorow. Make up a routine, diet, etc, and stick with it. There are countless resources on the internet to help you out here. As I said before, under $200 will get you bench along with weights, bar, etc. From this point on everything is up to you.
 

DopeFiend

Don Juan
Joined
Dec 27, 2003
Messages
32
Reaction score
0
I have a home setup right now. It's a bench and bar setup with a lat pull, and leg curl attached. I also have a barbell and weights. These are fairly cheap. It's limited in some ways. If you're new to working out, it's actually a good way to go. Just get in the habit of working out, sticking to your plan, and dieting. You can search on the web on the various workouts you can do with what you have. A full body workout is possible with this set up. It may be hard though, such as lifting the bar over your head while you stand for certain workouts.

I started off using a gym. It was a waste of money since I didn't do enough research on working out. And I didn't really have a diet going either. If I went to the gym now, I'd know exactly what to do cause I learned through my home setup.
 

madgame

Master Don Juan
Joined
Jun 23, 2003
Messages
860
Reaction score
1
Actually I wouldnt say this set-up is limited at all. You can do all types of bench-presses, lat pulls (and other really good exercises for your back with barbells and dumbbells..sorry cant remember their names right now), all types of curls, you can work out your triceps with the dumbells or barbells, you can do situps...you can do squats...also leg curls...military presses (while sittin on the bench), deadlifts,.....all in all you can do the best exercises there are. The only limitation to your workout is that you cant do all those fancy-exercises you could do with all those machines at the gym who arent any better, rather worse.
 

Dj Tiesto

Don Juan
Joined
Oct 26, 2003
Messages
82
Reaction score
0
Location
Canada
Thnx for the replies.
I got the idea that home work out can be really good.

The only negative thing is that I can't get a bench. My room isn't big enough+ I don't have a basement. It's not like a chair is comparable to a bench. So the only thing I got is dumbells...

Can a home work out still be beneficial without the bench?
 

madgame

Master Don Juan
Joined
Jun 23, 2003
Messages
860
Reaction score
1
Umm..if u dont have a bench u cant really work out your chest. Is there no way u could get a bench? Couldnt u put it in the middle of your room for the workout (dont tell me your room is thaaat small lol) and put it somewhere else...in a corner...whateva when u dont need it?
 
Joined
Nov 14, 2003
Messages
299
Reaction score
0
Heavy and hard is good for muscle strength..not necessarily muscle size
Warlock! This is exactly what the bb guy who runs my gym said. He said If I want to get big, stick to the 10-15 rep range. He said training under 10 reps won't get you big, he said that's training for strength... So you agree with that then Warlock? Everyone else says to get "big" lift heavy with low reps, and they scoff at the idea of up to 15 reps to get big... It's got me confused because I'm hearing contradicting things here...
Drop it down a notch and do it slower, you will *definately* feel it.
So are you telling him to up the reps and then he'll feel the soreness the next day? Please explain... What should I do, 10-15 reps to "grow" like my gym instructor said, or 8 reps with heavier weights?? Thanks.
 
Joined
Mar 22, 2002
Messages
101
Reaction score
0
Location
Sydney, Australia
Originally posted by Mr.Hash wid da Stash
He said If I want to get big, stick to the 10-15 rep range. He said training under 10 reps won't get you big
Absolute bu!! sh!t. I haven't gone above 8 reps in any exercise for the last 10 years and I'll bet I'm probably bigger than your gym instructure (I'm currently 240lb @ 20-23% body fat and 18.5" arms - personal best bench press is 3 reps of 365lb - without steroids or supplements other than protein). Just to show you what a physique built with 6 reps looks like here a link - http://f2.pg.photos.yahoo.com/rswallan - OK I won't be challenging Ronnie Coleman anytime soon, at least not without taking up the roids but I'm not exactly small either.

The general consensus seems to be to do 4 or less reps for pure strength (i.e. power lifting) and 8 to 12 for body building. I've gotton great results in both size and strength doing mainly 6 reps for most exercises. (Though I've recently gone to 8 reps and think I am seeing some improvement in size - though it may just be psychological because I am on a cutting diet and seeing my muscles better - my muscles are more sore though the next couple of days after the 8 rep work outs than they have been on 6 reps so I am going to stick with 8 reps for a while now).

Your instructor is roughly right in that you do lower reps for strength and higher (but not to high) for more hypertrophy. At least that's what the consensus of opinion that I've come across seems to be. It gels with my experience too. (I hit my perosnal best bench press of 365lb a couple of years ago when i dropped my usual volumn training and reduced my reps in the bench to about 4 and my sets to about 2).

Your instructor may be right in saying 12 reps is better than 8 for body building (though I doubt it, I think 10 or higher is too high). Your instructor is definitely wrong though in saying that anything under 10 reps won't work at all in giving you size. While it is true that 8 reps is probably better than 6 for size, even 6 still works great for size, I am living proof of that.

At the end of the day you have to experiment and see what works for you. Spend a month or two doing 12 reps for your work outs then a month or two doing 8 reps and see what gives you the better results.

My bet is that you'll see better results with 8 reps than you will with anything above 10.
 
Last edited:
Joined
Nov 14, 2003
Messages
299
Reaction score
0
Hey Alpha Male Female Catcher,
Hmm good point. You look pretty massive, that chest protrudes like hell! But the thing is I noticed when I went to 15 reps I felt my muscles sore the next day. The week after I tried lifting heavier and going for a max of 8 reps and I was significantly less sore. Is soreness a good indicator of how well your growing? Ie; "sore muscles next day= your growing"? Thanks.
 
Joined
Dec 14, 2003
Messages
293
Reaction score
0
Location
kingdom of latveria, central europe
Originally posted by Mr.Hash wid da Stash
Hey Alpha Male Female Catcher,
Hmm good point. You look pretty massive, that chest protrudes like hell! But the thing is I noticed when I went to 15 reps I felt my muscles sore the next day. The week after I tried lifting heavier and going for a max of 8 reps and I was significantly less sore. Is soreness a good indicator of how well your growing? Ie; "sore muscles next day= your growing"? Thanks.
Soreness means your muscles need protein and carbs to repair themselves. It is not an indicator of muscle growth per se.

The only way to make your muscles grow is to OVERLOAD them. That way they are forced to grow.

Soreness does not necessarily come from overload. It comes from the thousands of microtrauma in the muscle fibers following a resistance workout. You can cause this microtrauma by using light weights or going heavy. Which means that yes, you may be sore, but you aren't forcing the right types of muscle fibers, the fast-twitch ones, to grow. You can only get those to grow by going heavy.

hope this clears things up a bit.

Oh yeah, most personal trainers don't know shyt about training people. Any chimp can get a trainer's certification these days.
 
Joined
Mar 22, 2002
Messages
101
Reaction score
0
Location
Sydney, Australia
Originally posted by Mr.Hash wid da Stash
Hey Alpha Male Female Catcher,
Hmm good point. You look pretty massive, that chest protrudes like hell!
Thanks Mr Hash. Front on I wish my chest was a bit wider but the side view I am quite happy with. Guess it means I'm more suited to power lifting than body building.

But the thing is I noticed when I went to 15 reps I felt my muscles sore the next day. The week after I tried lifting heavier and going for a max of 8 reps and I was significantly less sore. Is soreness a good indicator of how well your growing? Ie; "sore muscles next day= your growing"? Thanks.
I have read some theories that soreness is bad and others that it is good and I doubt think even the professional scientific researchers on the topic know for sure (don't think there is a definitive theory yet).

I have allways assumed soreness is good. If nothing else it is an indicator that you gave the area a pretty good work out. That is not debatable (i.e. you definitely did some damage). What is debatable is wether you did too much damage i.e. hit the area too hard ot not. Some say yes soreness is a sign of overtraining.

Others like me say no its not, rather soreness is what you should strive for after every work out. I have rarely failed in achieving sore pecs after a bench press workout and as you noted my chest is probably my best asset. So trainging to induce soreness hasn't done me any harm and quite likely has done me a lot of good (thats how I got to be the size I am).

That being said I do not retrain until the soreness is gone and I feel that the area has completely recovered. In fact I only train once a week. Again there is much debate as to wether or not it is good to retrain muscles while they are still sore. Some here will say yes others like me say no. (If you workout as intense as I do during a workout I suspect waiting a week to retrain is the way to go - lower intensity but more regualr training is just a different way of achieving the same results).

My once a week workout lasts 3.5 hours which most people on this site will say is an absolute no no as your muscles start being catabolized after about 1 hour. I have been doing a 3.5-4 hour workout once a week for the last 8 years and I have gotten bigger not smaller as my photos attest. So I am living proof that you can train only once a week and also for 4 hours at a time and still have your muscles growing bigger from week to week not smaller. (Mind you I train as intensley at the end of three hours as I did at the start - I read somewhere recently that going over the 1 hr mark is OK is you are still training very intensly as in this case your body is still releasing growth hormone instead of catabolizing agents - don't know if its true or not. I do suspect that for most people going over the one hour mark is bad though I suspect that years of training this way has caused my body to adapt to this type of training - I don't advice any one else to train this way).

If 15 sets are making you more sore than 8 then maybe you should go with the 15 reps. (Edited to say victor may well be right and soreness in the case of 15 rep workouts may not be indicitive of the right type of muscle stimulous to grow - I really don't know - like I said I have no experience of trainging going over 8 reps (and certainly won't be going over 8 reps anytime soon myself).

From time to time though it might be good to do the lower reps to work on increasing your strength (wether you do 8 or 15 reps). For example once a month do a strength oriented workout where you go for max weight with 6 reps.

As I understand it although increasing strength does not necesarily increase muscle size directly, it does how ever indirectly determine the max muscle size you can achieve.

Similarly increasing muscle size by volumn training doesn't directly increase muscle strength but it does indirectly determine the maximum strength you can achieve. (I'll have to write another thread to explain what I am talking about here).

I guess what I am saying is that yes concentrate on high volumn training to build size but from time to time you will have to do strength training to in order to break through plataeus to increase your size. So from time to time you should still do 6 reps for max weight workouts.
 
Joined
Dec 14, 2003
Messages
293
Reaction score
0
Location
kingdom of latveria, central europe
Originally posted by Alpha male Female Catcher
Just to show you what a physique built with 6 reps looks like here a link - http://f2.pg.photos.yahoo.com/rswallan - .
Yo man, you are fukkin swoll. Get that cutting diet on jam. You'd look dominating, cut to shreds at about 210-215. Make it happen, bro. Post your pics when you're done.

P.S. If cutting I wouldn't be fukkin with the 8 rep range. Stick to your bread and butter... cut the carbs down to the 150g/ day range and keep going heavy. You'll not only get ripped up, but you'll look dense, full, and hard. In short, brutal. Think Franco Columbu in competition shape.

P.S. 2 - Once you cut down the BF, that back lat spread is going to be vicious. Cobra hood all the way.

P.S. 3 - You need a bit more trap development to balance out your ridiculous chest - (your chest reminds me of Mike Katz'- it's fukkin huge! - it's gotta be around 50" ). The trap development will also give your back that thickness in the middle too; to really enhance the width of your lats.

P.S. 4 - you gotta get more sun!!! :D
 

madgame

Master Don Juan
Joined
Jun 23, 2003
Messages
860
Reaction score
1
I agree with most of the stuff that you said AMFC(havent read exactly everything though). I dont think 8 reps is better for size than 6 are though. I always start at about 6 reps and as soon as I manage to do 8 reps I put on more weight and usually start at about 6 reps again. And in this rep range Im getting the best results Ive ever gotten. But..umm your gym instructor said low reps are good for strength but not for size whereas high reps are better for size but not for strength?? I think thats complete bull****. Its kinda funny to see how smart a lot of gym instructors seem to be.....
If you gain strength youll gain size too. The more weight you can lift the bigger youll get. From what I know you cant influence that by a certain rep range.....

@AMFC: I havent read through the whole thread, but u said that you were at about 20-23% of bodyfat. Is that about the same fat levels that you were at when the pic was taken or have you dropped some pounds since then (cause u said you were in a cutting phase right now)? (just wondering)
Oh and keep the good work up! If you keep going and getting cut ull be a monster! lol
 
Joined
Mar 22, 2002
Messages
101
Reaction score
0
Location
Sydney, Australia
Originally posted by madgame
I agree with most of the stuff that you said AMFC(havent read exactly everything though). I dont think 8 reps is better for size than 6 are though. I always start at about 6 reps and as soon as I manage to do 8 reps I put on more weight and usually start at about 6 reps again.
I think your training method is spot on (because it corresponds exactly to how I have mostly allways trained). That is when I can do 6 reps of a particular weight, instead of increasing the weight to do 6 reps of a heavier weight I aim to increase my reps up to 8 reps of that weight then I raise the weight until I can only do 6 reps and repeat the cycle.

And in this rep range Im getting the best results Ive ever gotten. But..umm your gym instructor said low reps are good for strength but not for size whereas high reps are better for size but not for strength?? I think thats complete bull****.
My gym instructor is not alone in saying low reps for max strength (power lifting) high reps for size (body building). I have heard this theory from numerous sources. I have also tried this theory for myself and found it to work. Like I said when I dropped my usual 8 to 12 sets of 6 to 8 reps for chest down to just two sets of 4 reps I saw my max bench go from around 315 to 365, so this theory definitely works for me anyway. (The theory says by the way that 6 reps trains both size and strength, while 4 and under trains mostly strength without size and 10 and higher trains mostly size without strength. I will explain why this is the case and why the above trainging method that you describe is optimum at at the end of this reply).

Its kinda funny to see how smart a lot of gym instructors seem to be.....
Yeah I don't put much stock in gym instructors. I haven't let a gym instructor tell me what to do for the last 14 years of my 17 years body building. If you're a rank begginer you need them for the first year or two but after that (depending on how much you read up and experiment yourself) you're likley to know as much about trainging as they do.

I once new a girl who had only a months training in the gym (really bossy extraverted type) then when my original gym instructor left she went and did a 2 week course to get her gym instructing certificate and become our new gym instructor. She then started trying to tell me (who had 5 years experience under my belt at that time) how to train (despite the fact she only had a months experience) LOL!

At my current gym the gym instructors are two of the least muscular guys in the gym (even though one of them has been at it nearly as long as me), though its probably largely genetic - except the father of one of them is the gym owner and a former MR Canada. They don't try to tell me what to do and I think they would look silly if they did as I am much bigger and stronger than they are. (The gym owner a former Mr Canada does know a fair bit about taining and is fairly well built even at over 60 years old, though we disagree on a number of issues his advice for how to do power lifting did work for me).

If you gain strength youll gain size too. The more weight you can lift the bigger youll get. From what I know you cant influence that by a certain rep range.....
What you say is true in general (and certainly true at the 6 rep range) but it is a bit more complex than that (it is possible to vary the ratio of strength to size gained as I shall explain).

@AMFC: I havent read through the whole thread, but u said that you were at about 20-23% of bodyfat. Is that about the same fat levels that you were at when the pic was taken or have you dropped some pounds since then (cause u said you were in a cutting phase right now)? (just wondering)
When the pic was taken yesterday I was/am 107.5 kg (236.5 lb). I am just guessing the fat level (based on the fact that I measured myself as 27% fat when I was 264 lb).

Yes I am in a cutting phase. I started at 120kg (264lb) so to date in my cutting phase I have lost 27.5 lb. For a while there I was loosing 2 lb a week. Now I seem to have plataued again (I seem to lose weight in bursts). I only lost 1lb the last two weeks (and the week before that I actually gained a pound). Its a slow process but I am getting there it just takes perserverence.

Oh and keep the good work up! If you keep going and getting cut ull be a monster! lol [/B]
Thanks
 
Top