have you heard of the site www.seducingwomen101.com ? have you heard of the new site? have you r

[gabrielshear]

have you heard of the site www.seducingwomen101.com ?

have you read the ideas on it?

what do u think about it? before I plan to read all the articles on this site?

thanks

dongabrielshear

 

[icepick]

Interesting articles, very true in the BASICS but I don't think the DETAILS are exactly right.

It is basically about the strange "love at first sight" deal. She has a lot of harsh words for speed seducers though.

It is very very long, that site. It kind of explains why there are some girls out there that you can do everything wrong, and still get in the end. It will give you peace of mind for that.

Mostly, it is Jung's theorys on love. Very hard to follow, she is an overly verbose writer. The concept is simple though.

It ties in with stuff that xblitz, Pook, Shakespeare, etc. write about. As long as you disregard some of the psychobabble, it can be pretty accurate.

 

[BobbDobbs]

I tried reading a bit of that site. It is a very hard and boring go. Too much ranting, not enough meat.

 

[Cheiradawg]

That site is written by a woman. Nuf said.

CD

 

[Lone_raider]

I tried reading it once, some of the things clashed with what I've learned here. She writes really harshly as others have said, detracts from any good points she may have.

 

[Capi Crimini]

DAmn that ****s scarry. THe first thing she said happened to me unwillingly two night ago.

She's harsh but also true

I was hanging out at bondfire. And I was to bored to goof around wit my friends so I was jus standing wit them. And there was one girl wit them I didn't know her. SO i was just standing around and out of no where she tries to strike up a convo wit me. Out of nowhere. It caught me off guard. Anyway **** works. Sorry guys but I've always trusted women over guys.

 

[( . )( . )]

Originally posted by Capi Crimini
Sorry guys but I've always trusted women over guys.

your starting again darkfalcon, you were supposed to knock this sh!t off with the name change, next time you get the urge to press "submit reply" do us a favour and dont.

 

[Eternal]

Originally posted by ( . )( . )
your starting again darkfalcon, you were supposed to knock this sh!t off with the name change, next time you get the urge to press "submit reply" do us a favour and dont.

How is he starting again? Nothing seems out of order by him yet. I just edited his post to remove the link, since it had no use in this discussion.

Gabriel - I've seen the site and didn't care for it. I'll stick with Sosuave for all my dating advice needs.

 

[( . )( . )]

Originally posted by crazykid
How is he starting again? Nothing seems out of order by him yet. .

what are fvcking kidding? read that line again.
your a mod now it should be your job to rid the boards of this sh!t , not sit back and let more bollocks fill it up.

 

[Eternal]

Originally posted by ( . )( . )
what are fvcking kidding? read that line again.
your a mod now it should be your job to rid the boards of this sh!t , not sit back and let more bollocks fill it up.

I see nothing wrong with his opinion of him trusting women over guys. To each his/her own opinion.

 

[Capi Crimini]

Hell dude I was telling the truth. Istick to this site. That stuff was sorta uselful. THis site has good stuff too.

I do trust women more. I grew up with two sisters and I love them with all my heart. I never really had a fatherly figure in my life cause he was always traveling. SO I'm in disposition to trust women more in my mind. I always have. I'm not saying men don't know ****. I just feel women have the upperhand in what "women" want. Was wrong wit that?

 

[( . )( . )]

Originally posted by crazykid
I see nothing wrong with his opinion of him trusting women over guys. To each his/her own opinion.

exactly, and his opinion is rubbish no ifs no buts, and rubbish should be called out. (what i just did)

 

[Cheiradawg]

Taking advice from women in not always bad but it must be taken with a grain of salt. Her ideas are mostly correct however they need to be strained through a "DJ filter" to be useful.

For example, her thoughts on attraction are parallel with those outlined by the god-man Pook in "Be a Man."

 

[Cheiradawg]

This is what's wrong...

Originally posted by Capi Crimini
Hell dude I was telling the truth. Istick to this site. That stuff was sorta uselful. THis site has good stuff too.

I do trust women more. I grew up with two sisters and I love them with all my heart. I never really had a fatherly figure in my life cause he was always traveling. SO I'm in disposition to trust women more in my mind. I always have. I'm not saying men don't know ****. I just feel women have the upperhand in what "women" want. Was wrong wit that?

If CD was a woman who read the bible he would say:
First thing, there are alot of diffrent types of women that want alot of diffrent things. Second, most women don't know what they want. Third, if you happon meet a woman that knows what she wants then she might not want to tell you or she might not be able to tell you excatly.

Sence CD is a man and has read the bible he says:
Women want a MAN!!!

Getting a more opinions is great but why the heck would you wanna spend time hacking through crap when the meat of what ya need to know is here?