BetterCallSaul
Master Don Juan
This is yet another example of women who claim discrimination and/or harassment when it suits them. Read this article:
http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2014-07-02/goldman-sachs-boy-s-club-accused-of-mocking-women.html
Now for those who aren't familiar, Goldman is one of the top financial securities industry company in the world. Most new employees are typically in their 20s and early 30s, probably 60-70% male I would guess and Goldman is renowned for lavish bonuses to their top performing employees. In exchange, yes, people do have to work hard there which can include long hours and giving up a lot of free time you may have in your life.
So back to this story, the crux of these women's complaints boils down to the following:
1) Being called 'bimbos' at work
2) Not earning as much as men in comparable positions
3) Being passed over for promotions
4) Men fraternizing with each other, creating a "boys club" atmosphere
5) Men going to strip clubs
6) Men taking some clients to strip clubs
The only legitimate problem I see here, if proven, is #1. Calling people names of any kind in the workplace is definitely unprofessional and can be construed as harassment so to the younger folks on the board just keep your mouth shut even when the other person is wrong or instigating the problem. As for the rest of these complaints, these women prove they are vindictive simply based on the accusations they have leveled.
I would suggest they each need to take an introductory course on economics to learn how a capitalist society works in a [somewhat] free market. An employer is free to reward the employees they choose based on whatever criteria they want. You don't like it? Find a different employer who respects you and rewards you more. Have they considered the possibility they were simply not as good as the men working in similar positions, thus why the men were compensated more?
As for men going to strip clubs, who cares. How is this the company's problem? Whether they go there after work or during lunch, who cares? You take offense to men going to strip clubs? Will you sue every other men who has ever stepped foot in one too?
These women are examples of feminist thinking that seeks to emasculate the providing power men traditionally command simply because they either can't compete in the same area and/or they have a strong sense of entitlement that many would argue is more commonly found in younger generations today.
http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2014-07-02/goldman-sachs-boy-s-club-accused-of-mocking-women.html
Now for those who aren't familiar, Goldman is one of the top financial securities industry company in the world. Most new employees are typically in their 20s and early 30s, probably 60-70% male I would guess and Goldman is renowned for lavish bonuses to their top performing employees. In exchange, yes, people do have to work hard there which can include long hours and giving up a lot of free time you may have in your life.
So back to this story, the crux of these women's complaints boils down to the following:
1) Being called 'bimbos' at work
2) Not earning as much as men in comparable positions
3) Being passed over for promotions
4) Men fraternizing with each other, creating a "boys club" atmosphere
5) Men going to strip clubs
6) Men taking some clients to strip clubs
The only legitimate problem I see here, if proven, is #1. Calling people names of any kind in the workplace is definitely unprofessional and can be construed as harassment so to the younger folks on the board just keep your mouth shut even when the other person is wrong or instigating the problem. As for the rest of these complaints, these women prove they are vindictive simply based on the accusations they have leveled.
I would suggest they each need to take an introductory course on economics to learn how a capitalist society works in a [somewhat] free market. An employer is free to reward the employees they choose based on whatever criteria they want. You don't like it? Find a different employer who respects you and rewards you more. Have they considered the possibility they were simply not as good as the men working in similar positions, thus why the men were compensated more?
As for men going to strip clubs, who cares. How is this the company's problem? Whether they go there after work or during lunch, who cares? You take offense to men going to strip clubs? Will you sue every other men who has ever stepped foot in one too?
These women are examples of feminist thinking that seeks to emasculate the providing power men traditionally command simply because they either can't compete in the same area and/or they have a strong sense of entitlement that many would argue is more commonly found in younger generations today.