Atom Smasher:
You have no clue whatsoever what you’re talking about. You're making a blanket statement that something doesn’t exist based solely on an absence of your own exposure to it. It can't possibly exist; after all, you’ve never experienced it, right?
I do know what I am talking about. Not in the sense of the phrase of knowing your individual experience, but what science and reason speaks on the matter. Scientific experiments have established that people who are inclined to have paranormal experiences, like sensing ghosts and the occult, for example, have higher than average levels of dopamine, which causes you to perceive more patterns, but not so much dopamine as to be schizophrenic. So, I take the educated guess that truth be told you have more dopamine.
And not that this would apply to you, but experiments have also shown that the environment can cause hallucinations, by clusters of
infrasound (which vibrates your eyeballs) and areas with high electromagnetic fields, with the intensity of hallucination mediated upon someone's biochemistry, probably dopamine. And then there's the phenomena of
hypnagogic or
hypnopompic hallucinations, which is experienced by one out of four people. The point is the brain is very deceptive towards your senses, and before you can reach for the extraordinary you must first rule out the ordinary. There is a thing in reasoning called
inference to the best explanation, and this empirically grounded explanation is far more likely to be true than magical thinking.
To inform you on the science of near death experiences, the experiences are triggered by the blockage of the neurotransmitter
glutamate by the six dollar word
N-methyl-D-aspartate, which is a chemical cousin of ketamine, and are prevented with benzodiazepines. All of the elements of the experience are reproducible in experiments and by taking doses of ketamine. You don’t need to experience something yourself to assess its validity and the principle of parsimony, of simplicity, dictates that the simpler of two explanations is most likely to be true. In the words of the philosopher Rene Decartes, “When it is not in our power to determine what is true, we ought to follow what is most probable.”
But supposing for a moment that if what you “saw” was not some hallucination caused by your biochemistry, I would dare you to take the
$1 Million Dollar Paranormal Challenge as presented by the magician James Randi. If this “occult magic arts” is real then surely the results are reproducible. Simply demonstrate this in a controlled environment where the possibility of cheating has been removed and you will be $1 million all the happier, while revolutionizing the world and silencing skeptics. I'm not holding my breath.