'Man loving' feminists falsely blaming men
By Darren Blacksmith
Warning: Beware the new weapons in the sex-wars.
There is a new generation of sneaky feminism that is really growing this year. It doesn’t call itself feminism, in fact sometimes it calls itself anti-feminism, but look closer and you see the same old man-bashing BS re-cycled from the feminist manuals of propaganda. It’s feminism coming through the back door.
The battle is starting to shift onto our own ground. The anti-feminist feeling is growing stronger day-by-day amongst the public, and more men are waking up to what’s happened to them, and are joining networks online and reading sites such as this one. So what’s happening is that devious female writers with feminist tendencies are starting to realise that they need to re-package their views in order to continue to get the public to swallow them.
In their desperation, these feminazis are resorting to psychological warfare tactics - confuse the enemy by claiming things are the opposite of what they really are. Tell them black is white and white is black.
As the withered teats of feminism sag ever lower, its lame supporters are desperately trying to prop it up and make it appealing by using a bra with two cunning cups. They are deploying two new weapons in their effort to mislead the public:
Weapon 1: the ‘man-loving’ feminist.
The feminists are finally starting to realise that no-one likes feminism. A British survey last month revealed exactly this, and the newspapers allowed ample space for the feminists to have their say on the matter (as usual). And, as these women are usually very cunning and media-savy manipulators, they are now twisting their arguments as well as upping their attacks on men in order to survive in a 21st Century that is fed up with them.
They are now saying things like “Oh no, I’ve always loved men, I just think that women should be equal.” This sounds reasonable enough, until five sentences later they then say that they actually think women are better than men.
Feminist Jenni Murray has spend years promoting feminism through the mass media and her BBC radio show “woman’s hour” (bare in mind that the BBC is funded by everyone who buys a TV in the UK - you're forced to pay over £100 (A$300) per year - so that this woman’s career of undermining men has actually been paid for by men), but now brings out a book about boys and how wonderful they are. However, although her book claims to be “In praise of boys”, it is actually a Trogen horse to deliver the same old tired feminist arguments for the new era.
Reading through it you are constantly fed feminist messages such as there are no real differences between boys and girls, its purely how they are brought up, and how boys should be raised to do housework and run away from fights. Occasionally she seems to completely forget what her book is about and starts ranting about domestic violence against women and how jokes about women aren’t funny. She doesn’t want to praise boys, she wants to manipulate them into how she thinks they should be, and she wants to make money out of riding the new trend.
Another feminist cashing in on coupling her enviable access to media publicity with using an “I love males” facade to promote feminism is Germaine Greer with her new book “The boy” which is a glossy collection of photographs of naked and semi-naked little boys. Greer - who admits that much of the research for the book was conducted online, and that she expects to be labelled as a peadophile, wishes to promote the book as a celebration of the beauty of young boys and to reclaim the ‘right’ of women to enjoy looking at their naked hairless little bodies.
What will actually happen is that the book will make more money for Greer - one of the 20th Century’s most effective demonisers of men - it will also be a partial validation and promotion of gay paedophilic web-sites. It will do nothing to help the cause of men or boys, particularly those vulnerable ones who are sucked into child prostitution and form the stable of websites that feature bare little boys.
The reality is that most women prefer men, not boys, and that they prefer men of their own age or older. Also, if any of these little boys saw a wrinkly old she-baboon or Greer coming towards them they would probably puke.
Still, Greer has never been one to let reality slip into the screwed-up privileged fantasy world that she inhabits.
Weapon 2: Blaming men for the effects of feminism.
Women are starting to realise that there is a crisis in marriage - young men just don’t seem to want to marry in the same numbers that they used to (although the reality is that they probably want to marry, but not on the terms that society and women are offering them). But rather than look at what is forming the behaviour of young men, the feminist press are simply once again piling all the blame onto men.
We are attacked for being sexually active and “footloose and fancy-free” (the implication being that we are overly promiscuous) and we’re told that we’re “Irresponsible, self-absorbed (and) bad marriage material” (Susan Reimer, ‘Young men are running away from marriage’, Baltimore Sun, July 1st 2003). In another article we are told that we are discourteous, immature, and that although the western world is suffering an all time low in relations between men and women, and a consequent loss of hope for stable marriages and homes for children, we are ordered to “not blame all of the problems on feminism.” (Karen de Coster, “The twentysomething male, his times, and his environment" - de Coster claims to be against feminism, but spends a curious amount of time and energy defending it).
These women are expressing a general assumption amongst women that they have a right to blame all their problems on men, even when they were created by man-hating feminism which young men neither asked for nor wanted.
But, in these attacks on the character of young men it is worth baring in mind the following three points:
1. The idea that straight single men are over-promiscuous is a myth.
Every time a straight man sleeps with a woman they have both had sex, so how can straight men be more promiscuous? Also, remember when people start to insinuate that straight men are overly promiscuous that gay men are, as a group, far more promiscuous, with a certain cross-section of gays sleeping with hundreds of other men.
2. Tech-toys and hobbies aren’t always frivolous.
We are told that our interest in and desire to own technological products (cars, computers, cameras etc) is an immature obsession. It’s merely “toys for the boys”. But technology is the main driver of wealth, jobs and progress. A country that innovates new technology and has a strong consumer demand for technological products will have an advantage over any country that doesn’t. Our interest in these ‘toys’ is far more fruitful than the women’s interest in make-up, fashion and soap operas.
3. The way you act will determine how you are treated.
Young men now have to be educated in schools which favour girls, they have to compete with women for jobs, and they have to endure endless put-downs and degradations from women, even when they are trying to ask them for a date or befriend them. So its hardly surprising that many men are questioning the need to give special, chivalrous treatment - such as always opening doors, and giving up your seat on the train - to women. If women seek to disempower us and become our competitors then they do not automatically deserve special pampering, especially if we don’t even know them.
Equally, we are damned as being commitment-phobic, but women are acting in ways that are the exact opposite to what inspires commitment in men. If a woman acts like a slut, then a man will view her as one, he won’t be falling over himself to be tender and romantic and protective towards a woman who is loud-mouthed, hard-drinking, man-bashing, and dressed like a hooker. Many women claim they want to be courted for marriage, but then act in ways that only make them worthy to be pursued for sex and nothing more. Wake up girls - blokes like tarts for sex, but like genuine, caring, feminine women for marriage. It’s not exactly difficult to understand.
The men’s movement is growing daily, and even those who don’t even think of themselves as part of the movement are awakening to the effects that feminism is having on our societies. Their days are numbered. They are panicking, so beware these new weapons.
Sayno'
By Darren Blacksmith
Warning: Beware the new weapons in the sex-wars.
There is a new generation of sneaky feminism that is really growing this year. It doesn’t call itself feminism, in fact sometimes it calls itself anti-feminism, but look closer and you see the same old man-bashing BS re-cycled from the feminist manuals of propaganda. It’s feminism coming through the back door.
The battle is starting to shift onto our own ground. The anti-feminist feeling is growing stronger day-by-day amongst the public, and more men are waking up to what’s happened to them, and are joining networks online and reading sites such as this one. So what’s happening is that devious female writers with feminist tendencies are starting to realise that they need to re-package their views in order to continue to get the public to swallow them.
In their desperation, these feminazis are resorting to psychological warfare tactics - confuse the enemy by claiming things are the opposite of what they really are. Tell them black is white and white is black.
As the withered teats of feminism sag ever lower, its lame supporters are desperately trying to prop it up and make it appealing by using a bra with two cunning cups. They are deploying two new weapons in their effort to mislead the public:
Weapon 1: the ‘man-loving’ feminist.
The feminists are finally starting to realise that no-one likes feminism. A British survey last month revealed exactly this, and the newspapers allowed ample space for the feminists to have their say on the matter (as usual). And, as these women are usually very cunning and media-savy manipulators, they are now twisting their arguments as well as upping their attacks on men in order to survive in a 21st Century that is fed up with them.
They are now saying things like “Oh no, I’ve always loved men, I just think that women should be equal.” This sounds reasonable enough, until five sentences later they then say that they actually think women are better than men.
Feminist Jenni Murray has spend years promoting feminism through the mass media and her BBC radio show “woman’s hour” (bare in mind that the BBC is funded by everyone who buys a TV in the UK - you're forced to pay over £100 (A$300) per year - so that this woman’s career of undermining men has actually been paid for by men), but now brings out a book about boys and how wonderful they are. However, although her book claims to be “In praise of boys”, it is actually a Trogen horse to deliver the same old tired feminist arguments for the new era.
Reading through it you are constantly fed feminist messages such as there are no real differences between boys and girls, its purely how they are brought up, and how boys should be raised to do housework and run away from fights. Occasionally she seems to completely forget what her book is about and starts ranting about domestic violence against women and how jokes about women aren’t funny. She doesn’t want to praise boys, she wants to manipulate them into how she thinks they should be, and she wants to make money out of riding the new trend.
Another feminist cashing in on coupling her enviable access to media publicity with using an “I love males” facade to promote feminism is Germaine Greer with her new book “The boy” which is a glossy collection of photographs of naked and semi-naked little boys. Greer - who admits that much of the research for the book was conducted online, and that she expects to be labelled as a peadophile, wishes to promote the book as a celebration of the beauty of young boys and to reclaim the ‘right’ of women to enjoy looking at their naked hairless little bodies.
What will actually happen is that the book will make more money for Greer - one of the 20th Century’s most effective demonisers of men - it will also be a partial validation and promotion of gay paedophilic web-sites. It will do nothing to help the cause of men or boys, particularly those vulnerable ones who are sucked into child prostitution and form the stable of websites that feature bare little boys.
The reality is that most women prefer men, not boys, and that they prefer men of their own age or older. Also, if any of these little boys saw a wrinkly old she-baboon or Greer coming towards them they would probably puke.
Still, Greer has never been one to let reality slip into the screwed-up privileged fantasy world that she inhabits.
Weapon 2: Blaming men for the effects of feminism.
Women are starting to realise that there is a crisis in marriage - young men just don’t seem to want to marry in the same numbers that they used to (although the reality is that they probably want to marry, but not on the terms that society and women are offering them). But rather than look at what is forming the behaviour of young men, the feminist press are simply once again piling all the blame onto men.
We are attacked for being sexually active and “footloose and fancy-free” (the implication being that we are overly promiscuous) and we’re told that we’re “Irresponsible, self-absorbed (and) bad marriage material” (Susan Reimer, ‘Young men are running away from marriage’, Baltimore Sun, July 1st 2003). In another article we are told that we are discourteous, immature, and that although the western world is suffering an all time low in relations between men and women, and a consequent loss of hope for stable marriages and homes for children, we are ordered to “not blame all of the problems on feminism.” (Karen de Coster, “The twentysomething male, his times, and his environment" - de Coster claims to be against feminism, but spends a curious amount of time and energy defending it).
These women are expressing a general assumption amongst women that they have a right to blame all their problems on men, even when they were created by man-hating feminism which young men neither asked for nor wanted.
But, in these attacks on the character of young men it is worth baring in mind the following three points:
1. The idea that straight single men are over-promiscuous is a myth.
Every time a straight man sleeps with a woman they have both had sex, so how can straight men be more promiscuous? Also, remember when people start to insinuate that straight men are overly promiscuous that gay men are, as a group, far more promiscuous, with a certain cross-section of gays sleeping with hundreds of other men.
2. Tech-toys and hobbies aren’t always frivolous.
We are told that our interest in and desire to own technological products (cars, computers, cameras etc) is an immature obsession. It’s merely “toys for the boys”. But technology is the main driver of wealth, jobs and progress. A country that innovates new technology and has a strong consumer demand for technological products will have an advantage over any country that doesn’t. Our interest in these ‘toys’ is far more fruitful than the women’s interest in make-up, fashion and soap operas.
3. The way you act will determine how you are treated.
Young men now have to be educated in schools which favour girls, they have to compete with women for jobs, and they have to endure endless put-downs and degradations from women, even when they are trying to ask them for a date or befriend them. So its hardly surprising that many men are questioning the need to give special, chivalrous treatment - such as always opening doors, and giving up your seat on the train - to women. If women seek to disempower us and become our competitors then they do not automatically deserve special pampering, especially if we don’t even know them.
Equally, we are damned as being commitment-phobic, but women are acting in ways that are the exact opposite to what inspires commitment in men. If a woman acts like a slut, then a man will view her as one, he won’t be falling over himself to be tender and romantic and protective towards a woman who is loud-mouthed, hard-drinking, man-bashing, and dressed like a hooker. Many women claim they want to be courted for marriage, but then act in ways that only make them worthy to be pursued for sex and nothing more. Wake up girls - blokes like tarts for sex, but like genuine, caring, feminine women for marriage. It’s not exactly difficult to understand.
The men’s movement is growing daily, and even those who don’t even think of themselves as part of the movement are awakening to the effects that feminism is having on our societies. Their days are numbered. They are panicking, so beware these new weapons.
Sayno'
Thanks for posting this.