Dongfu
Banned
- Joined
- May 22, 2007
- Messages
- 943
- Reaction score
- 5
Stemming from my post about validating the MM, I came across this subject of creating attraction.
I got to thinking, "is this possible or realistic."
Hi, I'm 31 . . . and here is my thoughts jk-lol
Let's look at it the simplest way. When you meet a girl, does she have to build attraction before you are interested in her? Not me.
Based on her appearence, overall vibe, and the sound of her voice, the way she moves her eyes, how she introduces herself, what she says, how she moves . . .
all of these things I experience INSTANTLY, not after 10 minutes of her running game on me.
There are both pretty and not so pretty women who I would not sleep with no matter what they say or do. If I dont feel it, I dont feel it.
To me, attraction is like two magnets, you either cant keep them appart, or you cant push them together, depending on the orientation.
So I personally have doubts about the idea of 'building attracting'
You can interest her, you can tease her, you can make her laugh, you can neg her, but I feel she will decide whether or not she is attracted to you the moment you meet.
Further more, I feel that the games women play, like acting uninterested, and blocking your efforts before succumbing, give to the illusion that you were building attraction. Just because it took you a while to get confirmation of interest, doesnt mean it wasnt there from the beginning. Women can hide it well, to test you.
A word on "jealousy plot lines" and "hired guns," as advocated by Mystery.
These are methods that appeal to her ego and superficial reasoning. She may show interest in you when using these techniques, but it is not because she is necessarily attracted to "you". She is attracted to the "Idea" of winning you, or getting you away from the b!tch she doesnt like etc.
Relationships that start under this premise go no where. You may bang her a couple times, but it wont be that great, because there was no real intense attraction, which is what results in great sex.
Dong has spoken . . .
What do you guys think?
I got to thinking, "is this possible or realistic."
Hi, I'm 31 . . . and here is my thoughts jk-lol
Let's look at it the simplest way. When you meet a girl, does she have to build attraction before you are interested in her? Not me.
Based on her appearence, overall vibe, and the sound of her voice, the way she moves her eyes, how she introduces herself, what she says, how she moves . . .
all of these things I experience INSTANTLY, not after 10 minutes of her running game on me.
There are both pretty and not so pretty women who I would not sleep with no matter what they say or do. If I dont feel it, I dont feel it.
To me, attraction is like two magnets, you either cant keep them appart, or you cant push them together, depending on the orientation.
So I personally have doubts about the idea of 'building attracting'
You can interest her, you can tease her, you can make her laugh, you can neg her, but I feel she will decide whether or not she is attracted to you the moment you meet.
Further more, I feel that the games women play, like acting uninterested, and blocking your efforts before succumbing, give to the illusion that you were building attraction. Just because it took you a while to get confirmation of interest, doesnt mean it wasnt there from the beginning. Women can hide it well, to test you.
A word on "jealousy plot lines" and "hired guns," as advocated by Mystery.
These are methods that appeal to her ego and superficial reasoning. She may show interest in you when using these techniques, but it is not because she is necessarily attracted to "you". She is attracted to the "Idea" of winning you, or getting you away from the b!tch she doesnt like etc.
Relationships that start under this premise go no where. You may bang her a couple times, but it wont be that great, because there was no real intense attraction, which is what results in great sex.
Dong has spoken . . .
What do you guys think?
Last edited: