Blazing (swipe app)

[GoodMan32]

Has anyone else used (or at least heard of) a swipe app called Blazing?

I downloaded it yesterday. The app has both good and bad qualities (I could say more. First, however, I want to give others a chance to chime in)

 

[Solomon]

Isn't that a "Gay" app or no? like I'm not trolling lol

 

[Clockwerk50]

Isn't that a "Gay" app or no? like I'm not trolling lol

Lol OP is going to end up in Grindr soon.

 

[GoodMan32]

Isn't that a "Gay" app or no? like I'm not trolling lol

No. There are plenty of heterosexual broads on there.

Anyway, time for me to elaborate on my experience.

The app has a lot of downsides.

There's no way to set an age filter.

The app does what's called "message bombing." What does that mean? It means the app sends messages you never agreed to, on your behalf, to broads you might not even be into.

I ended up having a discussion with a broad I message-bombed on my morning break. Even though I didn't intend to message her (and even though her age of 24 puts her well below my preferred demographic), we had a good discussion.

Come lunch time (the next time I checked the app), I had messages galore from her. In order to read the messages, however, it made me pay $3.99 (which I did; small enough fee)

Upon reading the messages, she was acting clingy, shared a G-rated picture of herself, and even recommended we meet up. When I attempted to reply, however, the app told me I had to pay $30. I wasn't going to pay that.

I then deleted the app.

I also had a message from another young broad by the way (I believe she was 20)

The only real good quality of the app is the fact I got attention from broads pretty quickly.

 

[Bokanovsky]

 

[Clockwerk50]

No. There are plenty of heterosexual broads on there.

Anyway, time for me to elaborate on my experience.

The app has a lot of downsides.

There's no way to set an age filter.

The app does what's called "message bombing." What does that mean? It means the app sends messages you never agreed to, on your behalf, to broads you might not even be into.

I ended up having a discussion with a broad I message-bombed on my morning break. Even though I didn't intend to message her (and even though her age of 24 puts her well below my preferred demographic), we had a good discussion.

Come lunch time (the next time I checked the app), I had messages galore from her. In order to read the messages, however, it made me pay $3.99 (which I did; small enough fee)

Upon reading the messages, she was acting clingy, shared a G-rated picture of herself, and even recommended we meet up. When I attempted to reply, however, the app told me I had to pay $30. I wasn't going to pay that.

I then deleted the app.

I also had a message from another young broad by the way (I believe she was 20)

The only real good quality of the app is the fact I got attention from broads pretty quickly.

How hot were they? Are you sure the app wasn’t spamming bots in order to take your money?

 

[corrector]

No. There are plenty of heterosexual broads on there.

Anyway, time for me to elaborate on my experience.

The app has a lot of downsides.

There's no way to set an age filter.

The app does what's called "message bombing." What does that mean? It means the app sends messages you never agreed to, on your behalf, to broads you might not even be into.

I ended up having a discussion with a broad I message-bombed on my morning break. Even though I didn't intend to message her (and even though her age of 24 puts her well below my preferred demographic), we had a good discussion.

Come lunch time (the next time I checked the app), I had messages galore from her. In order to read the messages, however, it made me pay $3.99 (which I did; small enough fee)

Upon reading the messages, she was acting clingy, shared a G-rated picture of herself, and even recommended we meet up. When I attempted to reply, however, the app told me I had to pay $30. I wasn't going to pay that.

I then deleted the app.

I also had a message from another young broad by the way (I believe she was 20)

The only real good quality of the app is the fact I got attention from broads pretty quickly.

That sounds like a scam. I mean, the whole thing sounds like it's too good to be true, to get attention from girls like that. However, when I heard you had to pay, then it's like aha, that is what this is about. Wow. She might be an AI program, a bot, or someone who is saying the same messages to get people to pay and then she might ghost-out or never meet up, or maybe they'll upsell you for the gold-package for $100 (ie yeah, you only get 3 messages for $ 30, but if you want to send more, another $ 100). It already went from $ 3.99 to $ 30 being under 10 times.

You really believe this thing? You might as well stick to your comfort zone rather than get ripped-off.

 

[corrector]

But, wow. This is what it's come to. This is preying on allot of desperate guys. What a gut punch after failing in Tinder/Bumble, etc... to then get actually ripped off and dangled a false hope carrot by this Blaze app. What a further blow to the ego. They should be sued for false advertisement and punitive damages.

 

[AmsterdamAssassin]

With the decline of the standard dating apps, these scammer apps are popping up all over social media. As soon as you have to pay to send messages or read messages or see likes, you know they're taking you to the cleaners. Don't be a moron.

Come lunch time (the next time I checked the app), I had messages galore from her. In order to read the messages, however, it made me pay $3.99 (which I did; small enough fee)
Upon reading the messages, she was acting clingy, shared a G-rated picture of herself, and even recommended we meet up. When I attempted to reply, however, the app told me I had to pay $30. I wasn't going to pay that.

You're a moron for even signing up for these dating apps. They are scammers using stolen photos to 'interact' with desperate lonely guys. Get a clue, okay? There are no women looking for sex/love on the other side of your interactions.

 

[Ricky]

I knew this would happened. I envisioned an AI chatting on your behalf while you were at work and then you collect the interested parties and talk to the ones you want or go out with one that night

the problem is pretty quickly you just have two AI’s talking to each other and two very incompatible people meet. Even if the AI is very customizable based on your interests.

i am also seeing AI wingman apps.

 

[Vanderdonck]

 

[RangerMIke]

A female friend in LA signed up for a dating ap, Bumble.... in one day she got 3,000 hits.

Why in the fvck would any man want to sign up for that sh1t.

Put your profile up and have some chick, whose only value in this world being her looks, just casually swipe your profile into the toilet like you are some @sswipe on TP.

 

[GoodMan32]

How hot were they? Are you sure the app wasn’t spamming bots in order to take your money?

The 24 year old was slightly above average.

The 20 year old was a 9/10 I'd say.

It's possible the 20 year old was a bot (all she said was "hey")

The 24 year old sounded too advanced to be a bot.

 

[corrector]

The 24 year old sounded too advanced to be a bot.

Pay the $ 30 and find out then.

 

[GoodMan32]

Pay the $ 30 and find out then.

For a woman I don't even want sex with, I'm not about to waste $30.

Yeah, I'd be down to accept a date with her (to boost my self-esteem)...but still not worth the $30.

 

[SW15]

A female friend in LA signed up for a dating ap, Bumble.... in one day she got 3,000 hits.

That's the abundance that we discuss all the time that women receive on swipe apps.

No woman could get a fraction of that sort of abundance from going to bars. That sort of abundance can't be duplicated by living an offline life in any way.

 

[GoodMan32]

That's the abundance that we discuss all the time that women receive on swipe apps.

No woman could get a fraction of that sort of abundance from going to bars. That sort of abundance can't be duplicated by living an offline life in any way.

Yeah. Which is why there was way less abundance 30 years ago.