Article for the thinkers of Sosuave

the_govner

Don Juan
Joined
Jan 2, 2008
Messages
134
Reaction score
1
Written by a friend on facebook, it's going to be printed for academic publications (in asia) in a few months, he's allowed me to post it whereever I want. Rather similar to those written by the great Interceptor, so I thought you guys would like it. Enjoy!:

Ethics: The awkward kid in Capitalism class


I would like to begin this article (and run-on sentence) by stating that we should have probably realized that there was a bit of a problem with the system when it was decided that students must undergo an entire discipline that deals with the simple usage of our conscience. Our conscience - sometimes referred to as natural law - is one of the few things that is inherent in all of us. Like gravity, it existed before it was discovered. Therefore, having courses dedicated to it assumes that it is something that must be learned. However, based on the reality that this knowledge is inherent, the fact that it must be learned simply means that we had to unlearn it first. And thus, instead of passively struggling through this vicious cycle, we must tap the source that has led us to unlearn this truth that we once knew.



Capitalism – the Overrated-ism



Before I bash the daylights out of capitalism, I would like to let you know that I am typing this article from my Ipad in a beautiful hotel lobby while wearing a wonderfully tailored Italian suit. There is nothing wrong with the fruits of capitalism for as long as it isn’t the center of our universe.



Moreover, I truly believe that capitalism has been our most effective economic system yet. It has allowed us to make great strides with regard to poverty alleviation and international trade. It has allowed us to reach astonishing heights within various fields and disciplines. However, as much as I loathe the fact that I’m about to quote the overly abused line from the Spiderman movie, great power truly DOES come with great responsibility. In the case of capitalism, the incredible freedom that it has provided may have resulted in a mindset that truly exposes its flaws.



Capitalism as a mindset is about nothing but incentives. We live in an incentivized system. We chase pleasure and we avoid pain. We chase success and we avoid failure. As students, we chase good grades and avoid bad ones. In relationships, we chase acceptance and avoid rejection. Every single solitary decision we make is directed toward and based upon the pursuit of a carrot and the avoidance of a stick. We are slaves of duality.



This is the capitalistic mindset. This is the system that raised us and it is a culture that has been accepted. It is so deeply entrenched in our ethos that it almost seems like a universal truth and thus, questioning it seems like an exercise in futility. So brace yourselves my dear audience, for questioning it is what my trustee Ipad and I are about to do.



The Capitalistic Paradox



When capitalism took over as a dominant ideology, it promised to deliver something that the world had never seen before its inception. It guaranteed individuality. This was beautifully timed as man had just recently kicked God to the curb and accepted himself as the center of our universe. Capitalism promised individuality and established this unheard of idea that every man should pursue as much wealth as he possibly could.



Here lies the paradox. By creating a culture that has led almost every man to believe that wealth is what we need to desire, the mindset of capitalism put an end to individuality. We live within a framework where we all want the same things. We chase results. Capitalism, the supposed hero of individuality and diversity, has resulted in a mindset that has led to mass conformity.



Let us look around us (At least in the Asian setting). In the 80s, we were told that banking was the future. In the 90s, the whole world wanted to take up Information technology for there was much to be made in the computer industry. In the last decade, nursing and outsourced jobs took over as the path to milk and honey. In the field of business, most people establish companies and brands based on one simple phrase – “oh this could sell”. Our professional lives have been reduced as a mere means to our desirable ends. Majority of us can admit to the fact that we have chosen the path that provides us with the ‘best results’ and at the end of the day, these paths are nearly identical to everyone else’s. We were raised in this system. We have accepted it as truth and we were never given any genuine alternatives. Fear not dear readers, for these ends that we seek can as well be achieved without necessarily having to focus on them.



The Part Where Ethics Disappears



Within this framework, we are continuously striving to build beautiful houses on sand. We have become so attached to our ends that whenever we momentarily lose our success, pleasure, or wealth, we immediately fall into the opposite states of pain and depression. For as long as our focus is on the fruits of our actions, we will perpetually live in this vicious cycle of pleasure and pain. And as a result of our insatiable desire to remain on the good end of the cycle, we resort to actions that may not exactly be agreeable to our conscience. Unethics is born.
 

the_govner

Don Juan
Joined
Jan 2, 2008
Messages
134
Reaction score
1
The Solution



The good news is that the solution that is about to be provided will garner the same results that we have perpetually desired. The better news is that when this solution is pursued, these desires will no longer be the central focus of our existence.



As mentioned previously, we have been encouraged to work within a framework that has resulted in mass conformity. The reason for this is the heavy focus on results or what can simply be referred to as the ‘what’. The change that must be made has to do with respect to how we arrive at this ‘what’. Therefore, instead of focusing on results, we must focus on purpose or the ‘why’.



Ken Robinson, one of the world’s leading thinkers (and mavericks) in the field of education, claims that the framework that we currently live in can be summarized in one question, “How intelligent are you?” Based on this question, the perfect 10’s will be most successful and will be provided with unlimited opportunities, followed by the 9’s, the 8’s, and so on and so forth. We have our winners and we have our losers. Thankfully, he deems the question as stupid.



According to Mr. Robinson, the question that should be asked is, “how ARE YOU intelligent?” Therefore, intelligence isn’t a measure. It isn’t about who is a 5 or who is a 7. In the same book, it is stated that the human brain is like the thumbprint; we are all geniuses in our own right and in our own distinct ways. We are all unique 10’s. Once we begin to appreciate this, we can truly begin the path towards genuine diversity.

Since each and every one of us is distinctly talented, it follows that each of us has a unique purpose. This purpose is our WHY, it is our meaning and it is our reason for being. So when they say that not everyone can be Michael Jordan, they aren’t kidding. However, what they have failed to mention is that we all have the propensity to become the Michael Jordan of our respective paths.



In his book entitled Flow: The Psychology of Optimal Experience, Dr. Mihaly Csikszentmihalyi (thank God this is an article and not a speech) writes of a “state of mind when consciousness is harmoniously ordered, and people want to pursue whatever they are doing for its own sake…. the key element of an optimal experience is that it is an end in itself.”



Doing things for their own sake that it is an end in itself – this is the ideal that we must collectively pursue. When we find our distinct purpose, our unique path, the thing that makes our hearts sing, or whatever else we can call it, we achieve true joy. Instead of striving to complete ourselves through our desires and results, we are fulfilled through our work.



How then you may ask, does this apply to being ethical? The essence of ethics is long-term thinking. When you are focused on the why, or purpose, you chase tangible long-term goals. Michael Jordan wanted to be the best basketball player on the planet, he didn’t go out and say that he wanted to be worth millions of dollars and achieve incredible fame. Albert Einstein wanted so badly to prove relativity; he didn’t go out and say that he wanted to be the most famous scientist of all time. Mahatma Gandhi wanted to prove the power of non-violence more than anything else, he didn’t go out and say that he wanted to be known as an international hero. When you discover and chase your purpose, the results come by themselves. And more importantly, when you think long-term, you need not compromise on your morals or your conscience because your focus is on perfecting the task at hand, not on garnering immediate results.



Amazingly, this even applies to the business world. One of our world’s great brand strategists, Al Ries, constantly talks about the most successful brands as being the most focused brands. When a brand stands for something distinct, that’s when you have a winner on your hands. In our case, this once again applies to purpose. When you begin your business venture with a why, rather than looking around aimlessly for what sells, you will think in the long-term.



When you think back, it seems as if every successful business begins with a story. It doesn’t begin with a person saying, “I want to be a businessman – which market should I get into?” The Body Shop began when Anita Rod**** wanted to sell quality goods that transcended mere hype, which she accompanied with a commitment to social responsibility. Vitamin Water began when J. Darius Bikoff, a health nut, was looking for a something that could be better than water. Starbucks began when Howard Schultz, wanted to create a “third place” (neither work or home) for people to socialize in. The first two brands have remained focused and have stuck to their purpose. When you think long-term, you do not have to constantly think about being ethical because simply doing what you do best is good in itself. Starbucks, on the other hand, fulfilled their purpose and began chasing results. They began rapid expansion, product line extensions, and even opted to remove the word coffee from their logo so that they could increase their product offerings. Has Starbucks lost its purpose and reason for being? Yes. Has it been successful? No. We are constantly reminded of the fact that 9 out of 10 businesses go broke in the first 12 months. Businesses and brands alike must begin and end with purpose.





And Lastly…



Have I been too hard on capitalism? Yes and no.



Yes, because capitalism has done an incredible amount of good, which should never be taken for granted. And yes, because capitalism was established with good intentions. It was created based on the desire to allow each and every human being to pursue happiness which in their case, meant wealth. This, in my opinion, was far better than its predecessors, which allowed only a select number of people to be free to test and to fulfill their potentials.



No, because the goal that capitalism put forth for man, goes completely against our true nature, which is to live with purpose and achieve self-actualization through our work. Capitalism will always have its winners and its losers. However, if we live based on the framework that we each have a unique purpose based on our very distinct abilities, everyone wins in the end.



For as long as we live within this current mindset, ethics as a discipline will always be that awkward kid that sits in the corner with no one to talk to. Ethics was never meant to be something that we had to think about for it is a tool that is deeply ingrained within us. True and genuine ethics can only happen when we discover our purpose, our meaning, and reason for being. It will simply be about doing what we do best for its own sake.



Ipad out.
 

DanelMadr

Master Don Juan
Joined
May 11, 2006
Messages
752
Reaction score
23
Sorry but that is extremely weak.

Capitalism works best in rule of law environment with free people having their human rights and democracy. Therefore the best conditions for individual pursuit of happiness.

Many people choose materialism as a way of their happiness, that is our nature.

Prosperity creates problems...when you have everything, you have free time to think, you realize that success is not the answer and some of us want o ditch the system.....as in your post.

Wrong. It is individual thing, you can't force people to become ethical by engineering proper environment like ditching capitalism for Equal System, where everyone is 10.
In reality everyone will have to be 5 at best. Equality is dangerous myth. And it should be pursued only 'in front of law'. We are all God's children and brothers but don't take it to politics.

You have generations of former communist countries, who were educated differently and still struggled for freedom and capitalism, which is more just than anything.

With freedom comes responsibility and unfortunately it is sometimes missing - and people sin too much. At least they don't have to pretend that they are not guilty of greed, lust, envy, sloth, gluttony, envy and vain. They at least see, that they are on wrong path.

However, if we live based on the framework that we each have a unique purpose based on our very distinct abilities, everyone wins in the end.
^ that is capitalism. No better system to assure that exists.

And you won't success in capitalism when you cherish conformity, quite the opposite...you find a need nobody covered aka market opportunity.

Are you from China? It would explain a lot.
The thesis is down right wrong in argumentation and observation and "solution", sorry. The author knows 0 about free market, free society and all he bends towards 'U R 10' proclamation, which is how you sell self-help books.
 

HGKnights

Don Juan
Joined
Sep 7, 2011
Messages
50
Reaction score
1
I have to agree with DanelMadr,

The Capitalist system really has no control over the mentality of how businessmen or aspiring businessmen operate, though this article could be a great one if put towards the point of view of one struggling to get a business off of the ground, however to push it towards capitalism as a whole, it really doesn't make much sense. At least not in the United States.

And I'm also curious, what part of Asia are you from?
 
Top