Rollo Tomassi
Master Don Juan
I've posted a lot about feminine social conventions in the past. In fact I find it hard not to see how these contrivances serve the feminine whenever a noob post some variation of a "problem" that's very real for him, but we've heard hundreds of times on this forum. One of these contrivances is the myth of the feminine mystique. I didn't really cover this well in Operative Social Contrivances, but the idea of 'fate' or luck as it applies to the contrivance of the feminine mystique has been discussed by STR8UP and myself recently so I thought I'd elaborate.
The Feminine Mystique
Perhaps the single most useful tool women have possessed for centuries is their unknowablity. I made that word up, but it's applicable; women for hundreds of years have cultivated this sense of being unknowable, random or in worse case fickle or ambiguous. This is the feminine mystique and it goes hand in hand with the feminine prerogative - a woman always reserves the right to change her mind. While a Man must never be anything less than forthright and resolute - say what you mean, mean what you say - women are rewarded and reinforced for being elusive. In fact, if done with the right art, it's this elusiveness that makes her more desirable. However, to pull this off she must be (or seem to be) unknowable.
On this forum we strive to breakdown confusion and common problems by observing behavior, and we all know that women are human beings with the same basic motivations that men are subject to with some variation. The point being that women are every bit as subject to being as mundane as men are, but the difference is that men don't enjoy a masculine mystique. With rare exceptions, we don't generally cultivate this sense of mystery because we're not rewarded for it as women are - and honestly, we haven't needed to. But for a woman, if she can cultivate this mystique, her attentions become a reward to themselves for the guy who is lucky enough to tame her.
How many times have you been asked by a friend, "so, did ya get lucky with Kristy last night?" We don't think much of this passing question, but it's framed in such a way that men autonomously perpetuate the myth of this mystique. It's not luck that gets you laid. I understand that circumstance and being the right guy at the right time most certainly plays a part, but that's not what I'm driving at here. However, if we feel as though we got lucky, we won the lottery, or walked away with the PRIZE, it doesn't help us to understand what it is we did correctly in a given instance. Not only that it perpetuates women as the prize-givers. You were lucky to have gotten sex with her so it must be something rare and valuable indeed.
Because of this, most men don't question the process or the motives involved in intergender relations; they're just happy to have had the experience. When mixed with sexual deprivation, the luck element makes the sex that much more absorbing. It's this luck precognition for men and fostered by women that leads to the scarcity mentality and often (but not exclusively) ONEitis in men. It serve the feminine if men willingly adopt the luck mindset with regards to their intimacy. Sexuality is a woman's first, best agency and any social mechanism that contributes to the value of it will always be encouraged.
The Feminine Mystique
Perhaps the single most useful tool women have possessed for centuries is their unknowablity. I made that word up, but it's applicable; women for hundreds of years have cultivated this sense of being unknowable, random or in worse case fickle or ambiguous. This is the feminine mystique and it goes hand in hand with the feminine prerogative - a woman always reserves the right to change her mind. While a Man must never be anything less than forthright and resolute - say what you mean, mean what you say - women are rewarded and reinforced for being elusive. In fact, if done with the right art, it's this elusiveness that makes her more desirable. However, to pull this off she must be (or seem to be) unknowable.
On this forum we strive to breakdown confusion and common problems by observing behavior, and we all know that women are human beings with the same basic motivations that men are subject to with some variation. The point being that women are every bit as subject to being as mundane as men are, but the difference is that men don't enjoy a masculine mystique. With rare exceptions, we don't generally cultivate this sense of mystery because we're not rewarded for it as women are - and honestly, we haven't needed to. But for a woman, if she can cultivate this mystique, her attentions become a reward to themselves for the guy who is lucky enough to tame her.
How many times have you been asked by a friend, "so, did ya get lucky with Kristy last night?" We don't think much of this passing question, but it's framed in such a way that men autonomously perpetuate the myth of this mystique. It's not luck that gets you laid. I understand that circumstance and being the right guy at the right time most certainly plays a part, but that's not what I'm driving at here. However, if we feel as though we got lucky, we won the lottery, or walked away with the PRIZE, it doesn't help us to understand what it is we did correctly in a given instance. Not only that it perpetuates women as the prize-givers. You were lucky to have gotten sex with her so it must be something rare and valuable indeed.
Because of this, most men don't question the process or the motives involved in intergender relations; they're just happy to have had the experience. When mixed with sexual deprivation, the luck element makes the sex that much more absorbing. It's this luck precognition for men and fostered by women that leads to the scarcity mentality and often (but not exclusively) ONEitis in men. It serve the feminine if men willingly adopt the luck mindset with regards to their intimacy. Sexuality is a woman's first, best agency and any social mechanism that contributes to the value of it will always be encouraged.