ACLU... bunch of sickos.
- Thread starter Bling
- Start date
- Status
Bible_Belt
Master Don Juan
Stupid First Amendment right to freedom of association!
The ACLU isn't defending NAMbLA's "right" to have sex with boys, they're defending NAMbLA's right to have rights.
They do have a right to be batsh*t crazy; it's in the Constitution. I don't think anyone can deny that NAMbLA is pretty ass-backwards–no pun intended–but they still have Constitutionally-guaranteed rights.
The ACLU isn't defending NAMbLA's "right" to have sex with boys, they're defending NAMbLA's right to have rights.
They do have a right to be batsh*t crazy; it's in the Constitution. I don't think anyone can deny that NAMbLA is pretty ass-backwards–no pun intended–but they still have Constitutionally-guaranteed rights.
Tell her a little about yourself, but not too much. Maintain some mystery. Give her something to think about and wonder about when she's at home.
Quote taken from The SoSuave Guide to Women and Dating, which you can read for FREE.
Mr. Unique
Master Don Juan
- Joined
- Dec 16, 2005
- Messages
- 654
- Reaction score
- 2
Re: Stupid First Amendment right to freedom of association!
what you said is evil in so many ways.
Boner da Stoner
Master Don Juan
Re: Re: Stupid First Amendment right to freedom of association!
sad, but true
Bonhomme
Master Don Juan
Just was at an ACLU party
Thursday night, in fact. Hung out with some real cool people.
Von Neuen's right on.
The ACLU does not approve of fvcking NAMBLA. However, the ACLU does think it's just as ridiculous to sue that organization for one member's individual actions as it is to sue tobacco companies because one gets cancer from smoking their cigarettes or to sue the NRA because one of its members commits a crime using a gun.
That is why the ACLU is defending NAMBLA in this particular case.
Thursday night, in fact. Hung out with some real cool people.
Von Neuen's right on.
The ACLU does not approve of fvcking NAMBLA. However, the ACLU does think it's just as ridiculous to sue that organization for one member's individual actions as it is to sue tobacco companies because one gets cancer from smoking their cigarettes or to sue the NRA because one of its members commits a crime using a gun.
That is why the ACLU is defending NAMBLA in this particular case.
wavejams007
Master Don Juan
Re: Re: Re: Stupid First Amendment right to freedom of association!
didn't realize you were part of NAMBLA.
wavejams007
Master Don Juan
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Stupid First Amendment right to freedom of association!
actually, I was excercizing MY freedom of Speech. But I guess you would be all right, along with Alicorn, with some guy raping your son, or even better, you.
I hate that the ACLU defends these pedophiles, too. NAMBLA members raped and killed a young boy in the Boston area a number of years ago. They aren't defending pedophiles who victimize opposite sex children...so why they defend NAMBLA is beyond me. It's disgusting.Originally posted by Bling
A bunch of faggots want to make love to little boys, and the ACLU is defending them. How sad.
meanwhile in a parallel universe : for those who just dont "get it"
The evangelical right, having gotten bush his presidency, but feeling betrayed has their own candidate for the next election. In a close race the "eve's" win. Their first goal is restoring the " moral order" of america. Family values and all. Using the broad language of the patriot act they " go after" the moral corrupters in society. Sosuave is shut down and all members are rounded up ( with the patriot act powers and todays technology it would be easily possible). Even those members on foreign soil are rounded up.
Oh wait.... reality strikes and the ACLU comes to the rescue and the alternate universe never occurs.
The evangelical right, having gotten bush his presidency, but feeling betrayed has their own candidate for the next election. In a close race the "eve's" win. Their first goal is restoring the " moral order" of america. Family values and all. Using the broad language of the patriot act they " go after" the moral corrupters in society. Sosuave is shut down and all members are rounded up ( with the patriot act powers and todays technology it would be easily possible). Even those members on foreign soil are rounded up.
Oh wait.... reality strikes and the ACLU comes to the rescue and the alternate universe never occurs.
Giovanni Casanova
Master Don Juan
- Joined
- Jan 5, 2002
- Messages
- 5,550
- Reaction score
- 18
- Age
- 45
- Location
- Hiding in Penkitten's Linen Closet
"The trouble with fighting for human freedom is that one spends most of one's time defending scoundrels. For it is against scoundrels that oppressive laws are first aimed, and oppression must be stopped at the beginning if it is to be stopped at all."
H. L. Mencken (1880 - 1956)
H. L. Mencken (1880 - 1956)
wavejams007
Master Don Juan
...but in a witty turn of events, the ACLU turns into a comunist government, and everything is censured, so no one on either side can say anything, for fear of "offending" someone.
Come on, the ALCU is a drag onsociety now. It used to be neccessary, but not really any more. Of course, the argument will now become, "but wavejams, racism and exploitation of hard workers and all still goes on."
You're right, but now the shoe is on the other foot. It is beter to be one of the minorities, or a member of NAMBLA or something. You get benefits and all out of it. Just my opinion though. (and no, obviously I am not after the benefits, ort part of any of the minorites other than being latin)
Actually,
more than ever is the ACLU needed now. Under Bush the government has started reducing the freedoms we have now. If you are a " terrorist" you can be rounded up and held without charges as long as they see fit. Bush wants clearance for the CIA to be able to use torture. AT the last state election in south dakota the republicans wrote down liscence plate numbers of native americans going to polling booths in a form of voter intimidation as part of a hottly contested senate race. That same election there was, in many states, voting on if to make gay marrige illeagal... All of these things narrowing the freedoms that people have.
It would be like the communist government in "1984."
We'd spy on our own citizens without representative oversight.
We'd wage endless wars against concepts, which, of course, can't be defeated.
The enemy would become one amorphous mass, and so we wouldn't care how many of them die.
If you were to lodge any complaints about the government's behavior, you'd be labeled anti-American and a friend of the enemy.
Justification for serious actions would shift as necessary.
Fake, pro-government news stories would be supplied to, and aired on, mass media.
Supposedly independent news columnists would be secretly paid to write propaganda.
Previously unbelievable truths, like global warming is not happening or evolution is just an unsupported idea, would become widely accepted.
Citizens would be caught up in meaningless conspiracy theories propagated by a few loud-spoken conspiracy theorists.
The states with the highest intelligence, tax rates, and most history would be labeled the most morally corrupt and least American.
We would be holding American citizens indefinitely without the right to trial.
The government would insist that it has never lost the moral high ground, ever.
Yeah. That would suck.
- Status