Unlock the Secrets to Dating Success

New to the SoSuave forum? Start your journey to becoming a dating rockstar with our essential guide.

This comprehensive resource will give you the tools and strategies you need to overcome obstacles, build confidence, and attract the women you've always wanted.

Don't let another day go by without taking control of your dating life - start now and get ready to experience the success and fulfillment you deserve.

Thanks for visiting, and I look forward to your success!

a woman should cook for her man II

a good woman cooks for her man

  • Agree

    Votes: 11 84.6%
  • Disagree

    Votes: 2 15.4%

  • Total voters
    13
  • Poll closed .

00Kevin

Master Don Juan
Joined
Jul 16, 2003
Messages
1,962
Reaction score
20
Location
toronto
I thought I would create a new thread as the last poll was manipulated by a bunch of woman. Women please respect the poll and leave it alone this time. If you can't accept the vote then get lost!

The last thread went into a number of issues so i thought i would continue those thoughts:

The issue about a woman cooking for her man:

All we can say is that a good woman DOES cook for her man. We are not saying that she should be forced to do this. That wouldn’t be the type of woman that most guys would want anyway. All we are saying is that when a woman cooks it’s a good sign that she is nurturing and that she has accepted her nature. This is clearly what most of us men want. In the family unit women make better nurturers and men make better providers. As a man you can’t let your right as a provider be taken away from you.

A man that is a true provider will tell you that there is no greater reward and feeling than seeing his little woman happy and possibly his children as well. It is also rewarding for a man to be the protector of his family. A real man would destroy anyone who dares disturb his adobe without thought. The feminist wants to take this away from you. Don’t let them. Be the man and don’t be afraid to be discriminatory when you select your mate. For every 50 women there is one that will appeal to you. So don’t be afraid to discard those that are of no use to you.

On a personal note, I can recall when I used to listen to what women said they wanted. There was a woman I was with that was a partial feminist. The more I was with her the more she tried to make me feel useless. She tried to take away everything that felt natural to me away. After a short time I had about enough and “nexted” her ass. I would encourage you to next any girl that thinks this way.

For those that want a crossbreeding, amorphous, appeal to both sexes kind of situation. All the power to you and to each 'its' own. All I have to say is good luck with that. I hope it makes you happy. Just don’t expect to be as happy as the man that fully provides for his woman and protects her, and don’t expect get respect from her for being a provider. She will try to take that way from you because she thinks she can do just as good a job.

As for the issue of roles:
If you had a large corporation would you give everyone the exact same job? If you did nothing would get done and there would be no one specialized enough or focused enough to make the company function. It wouldn’t make sense to make the financial director do the job of the marketing director and force the marketing director to handle the accounts. This is also true within the family unit. The problem is that women are told now at a young age that they can ignore their basic instincts. They are told that they should completely ignore their natural gifts and talents and strive to be more like a man. This is a disaster to the natural order of things and is why the divorce rate is so high. Women have been told to act a certain way and it is in direct conflict with their nature. This is the primary cause of why women don’t know what they want. A woman that accepts her role in the world is happy and isn’t confused. She is also the type of woman a man will give a ring to.

It is important note that a man should not treat a woman as the inferior. Women are not slaves. It is important to create an environment where the natural instincts of both sexes rise to their full potential, the nurturing woman and the man who is the natural provider.

As a side note, I would also like to point out that a man should never use the term “relationship”. Women talk about the “relationship” as if it was some kind of sacred entity between two people. When you are with your woman there is no such thing as ‘the relationship’. Your only thought should be that of your partner not “the relationship”. For a man “the relationship” doesn’t exist, it’s a stupid fema-nazi concept.

BTW, we have to admit that there were some inequalities in the past with regard to rights and freedoms for women. But that was the nature of those decades for all types of people. The last 50 years or so of feminism has caused great harm to the family and has created the abundance of AFCs that we all distain. Now I’m not saying that society hasn’t benefited in some way from feminism(although, i can't think of any ways it has at the moment), it’s just to point out the huge problems it has caused. It is also important to note that feminism is only a recent concept. When compared to the centuries of wisdom that created the family unit and our biological instincts, this foolishness will not stand the test of time. As men we know that all the gains in name of feminism where only achieved because we said it was ok. As men we know that we are always in control of the world (because in the end physical might gives us the power). The question for all of us is, is how much rope are we going to give them? Have we given them enough to hang themselves with yet? I can only guarantee that if they continue to feminize our culture there will be a great backlash. Men will be filled with rage and utter contempt for all this stupidly. The very need for this message board is rather sad. I suspect that this backlash has already begun.
 

Howie Farkes

Don Juan
Joined
Apr 19, 2003
Messages
178
Reaction score
0
Seems you want to make out that "Cooking for her man" is a reliable litmus test for a respectful woman. I think you're being far too simplistic. Why are you singling out cooking - why not "scrubbing the toilet" or "doing the laundry"? Now I've lived in my own bachelor pad for over 5 years now and have had to do all those things for myself over that time. And if I should choose to let a girl move in some time I wouldn't suddenly drop all those chores on her because of her gender.
They are told that they should completely ignore their natural gifts and talents and strive to be more like a man.
Since when was cooking a natural gift handed out only to females. With my LTR we share the cooking duties, why? Because I'm a pvssy? No, it's because I actually LIKE cooking for her sometimes and am not insecure enough to feel emasculated by that fact.
 

ShortyBrown

Master Don Juan
Joined
Jun 22, 2003
Messages
577
Reaction score
1
Age
43
Location
Australia
Originally posted by 00Kevin
I thought I would create a new thread as the last poll was manipulated by a bunch of woman. Women please respect the poll and leave it alone this time. If you can't accept the vote then get lost!

The last thread went into a number of issues so i thought i would continue those thoughts:

The issue about a woman cooking for her man:

All we can say is that a good woman DOES cook for her man. We are not saying that she should be forced to do this. That wouldn’t be the type of woman that most guys would want anyway. All we are saying is that when a woman cooks it’s a good sign that she is nurturing and that she has accepted her nature. This is clearly what most of us men want. In the family unit women make better nurturers and men make better providers. As a man you can’t let your right as a provider be taken away from you.

A man that is a true provider will tell you that there is no greater reward and feeling than seeing his little woman happy and possibly his children as well. It is also rewarding for a man to be the protector of his family. A real man would destroy anyone who dares disturb his adobe without thought. The feminist wants to take this away from you. Don’t let them. Be the man and don’t be afraid to be discriminatory when you select your mate. For every 50 women there is one that will appeal to you. So don’t be afraid to discard those that are of no use to you.

On a personal note, I can recall when I used to listen to what women said they wanted. There was a woman I was with that was a partial feminist. The more I was with her the more she tried to make me feel useless. She tried to take away everything that felt natural to me away. After a short time I had about enough and “nexted” her ass. I would encourage you to next any girl that thinks this way.

For those that want a crossbreeding, amorphous, appeal to both sexes kind of situation. All the power to you and to each 'its' own. All I have to say is good luck with that. I hope it makes you happy. Just don’t expect to be as happy as the man that fully provides for his woman and protects her, and don’t expect get respect from her for being a provider. She will try to take that way from you because she thinks she can do just as good a job.

As for the issue of roles:
If you had a large corporation would you give everyone the exact same job? If you did nothing would get done and there would be no one specialized enough or focused enough to make the company function. It wouldn’t make sense to make the financial director do the job of the marketing director and force the marketing director to handle the accounts. This is also true within the family unit. The problem is that women are told now at a young age that they can ignore their basic instincts. They are told that they should completely ignore their natural gifts and talents and strive to be more like a man. This is a disaster to the natural order of things and is why the divorce rate is so high. Women have been told to act a certain way and it is in direct conflict with their nature. This is the primary cause of why women don’t know what they want. A woman that accepts her role in the world is happy and isn’t confused. She is also the type of woman a man will give a ring to.

It is important note that a man should not treat a woman as the inferior. Women are not slaves. It is important to create an environment where the natural instincts of both sexes rise to their full potential, the nurturing woman and the man who is the natural provider.

As a side note, I would also like to point out that a man should never use the term “relationship”. Women talk about the “relationship” as if it was some kind of sacred entity between two people. When you are with your woman there is no such thing as ‘the relationship’. Your only thought should be that of your partner not “the relationship”. For a man “the relationship” doesn’t exist, it’s a stupid fema-nazi concept.

BTW, we have to admit that there were some inequalities in the past with regard to rights and freedoms for women. But that was the nature of those decades for all types of people. The last 50 years or so of feminism has caused great harm to the family and has created the abundance of AFCs that we all distain. Now I’m not saying that society hasn’t benefited in some way from feminism(although, i can't think of any ways it has at the moment), it’s just to point out the huge problems it has caused. It is also important to note that feminism is only a recent concept. When compared to the centuries of wisdom that created the family unit and our biological instincts, this foolishness will not stand the test of time. As men we know that all the gains in name of feminism where only achieved because we said it was ok. As men we know that we are always in control of the world (because in the end physical might gives us the power). The question for all of us is, is how much rope are we going to give them? Have we given them enough to hang themselves with yet? I can only guarantee that if they continue to feminize our culture there will be a great backlash. Men will be filled with rage and utter contempt for all this stupidly. The very need for this message board is rather sad. I suspect that this backlash has already begun.
I think that the wording of the post could be getting you into trouble.(good women cook) I personally think that if you like someone(male or female), why wouldn't you want to phucking cook for them, take care of them?

00Kevin, the points you have made are great. I
 

ShortyBrown

Master Don Juan
Joined
Jun 22, 2003
Messages
577
Reaction score
1
Age
43
Location
Australia
Originally posted by Howie Farkes
Seems you want to make out that "Cooking for her man" is a reliable litmus test for a respectful woman. I think you're being far too simplistic. Why are you singling out cooking - why not "scrubbing the toilet" or "doing the laundry"? Now I've lived in my own bachelor pad for over 5 years now and have had to do all those things for myself over that time. And if I should choose to let a girl move in some time I wouldn't suddenly drop all those chores on her because of her gender.
Since when was cooking a natural gift handed out only to females. With my LTR we share the cooking duties, why? Because I'm a pvssy? No, it's because I actually LIKE cooking for her sometimes and am not insecure enough to feel emasculated by that fact.
You'd be out the damn door if ya did make a girl scrub the toilet lol.

I don't think that Kev is singling cooking out. More so using it as an example of feminism is/has gone too damn far.
Getting off topic a little here:
Women have been told to act a certain way and it is in direct conflict with their nature. This is the primary cause of why women don’t know what they want. A woman that accepts her role in the world is happy and isn’t confused. She is also the type of woman a man will give a ring to.
This is because of phucking man haters like Germaine Greer. They've gone out and brainwashed women into thinking that men have this great power that they are holding over women and we should all band together to take it back. Then another hairy-legged thing built on that idea and it snowballed. They give women a set of rules to live by that basically say, "be your own person and beat your own drum." Hello? being your own person does not involve following someone elses guidelines on what that is.

I have learned to blur the edges. I can be a sports journo, get my props for the good writing that I do, and have the boys flirt with me all at the same time. I can go home, spend time with my boy,and have him happily let me tag along (sometimes lol) for Friday Night Football down at the pub with his friends. Cultivating a balance and having empathy and respect for people irrespective of gender is more important than fighting for "gender equality".
 

Howie Farkes

Don Juan
Joined
Apr 19, 2003
Messages
178
Reaction score
0
I don't think that Kev is singling cooking out. More so using it as an example of feminism is/has gone too damn far.
Then why has he started two separate polls with the question "Should a woman cook for her man?" Are you saying he's actually asking "Should a woman take a more typically traditional role within the household?"
 

ShortyBrown

Master Don Juan
Joined
Jun 22, 2003
Messages
577
Reaction score
1
Age
43
Location
Australia
Originally posted by Howie Farkes
Then why has he started two separate polls with the question "Should a woman cook for her man?" Are you saying he's actually asking "Should a woman take a more typically traditional role within the household?"
Don't ask me ask him. That's just my interpretation. I think he did it because people are messing with the poll.
 

00Kevin

Master Don Juan
Joined
Jul 16, 2003
Messages
1,962
Reaction score
20
Location
toronto
Originally posted by ShortyBrown
Don't ask me ask him. That's just my interpretation. I think he did it because people are messing with the poll.
yep that is correct. looks like it happened again though. :) oh well. so much for my 2 cents
 

Howie Farkes

Don Juan
Joined
Apr 19, 2003
Messages
178
Reaction score
0
Kevin - if you want your thread to stay on topic I suggest you clearly define what that topic may be or at least stick to it yourself. You posed the question "Should woman cook for her man?" then launched a rather lengthy discourse of your opions on gender roles and feminism in general.

Meh.:rolleyes:
 

iqqi

Master Don Juan
Joined
Jun 27, 2003
Messages
5,136
Reaction score
82
Location
Beyond your peripheral vision
i don't think people can mess with the polls. can't u only vote once under a user name?

and if the results are the same...

just be surprised. and learn.
 

00Kevin

Master Don Juan
Joined
Jul 16, 2003
Messages
1,962
Reaction score
20
Location
toronto
Originally posted by Howie Farkes
Kevin - if you want your thread to stay on topic I suggest you clearly define what that topic may be or at least stick to it yourself. You posed the question "Should woman cook for her man?" then launched a rather lengthy discourse of your opions on gender roles and feminism in general.

Meh.:rolleyes:
i agree is does look that way, but i was just responding to all the posts from the other thread. The previous thread covered a number of issues.

My orginal post was just a statement about the fact that it's a good sign if a women cooks a meal for you. I have noticed that hot selfish girls wouldn't even do that for you.
 

00Kevin

Master Don Juan
Joined
Jul 16, 2003
Messages
1,962
Reaction score
20
Location
toronto
Originally posted by iqqi
i don't think people can mess with the polls. can't u only vote once under a user name?

and if the results are the same...

just be surprised. and learn.

acutally you can. all you have to do is delete your cookies and view the thread without loging in.
 

00Kevin

Master Don Juan
Joined
Jul 16, 2003
Messages
1,962
Reaction score
20
Location
toronto
Originally posted by Howie Farkes
Seems you want to make out that "Cooking for her man" is a reliable litmus test for a respectful woman. I think you're being far too simplistic. Why are you singling out cooking - why not "scrubbing the toilet" or "doing the laundry"? Now I've lived in my own bachelor pad for over 5 years now and have had to do all those things for myself over that time. And if I should choose to let a girl move in some time I wouldn't suddenly drop all those chores on her because of her gender.
Since when was cooking a natural gift handed out only to females. With my LTR we share the cooking duties, why? Because I'm a pvssy? No, it's because I actually LIKE cooking for her sometimes and am not insecure enough to feel emasculated by that fact.

often a simple test is all you need.
 

MysteryWoman

Master Don Juan
Joined
Jan 9, 2002
Messages
902
Reaction score
1
Location
london, England
Originally posted by 00Kevin
I thought I would create a new thread as the last poll was manipulated by a bunch of woman. Women please respect the poll and leave it alone this time. If you can't accept the vote then get lost!

The last thread went into a number of issues so i thought i would continue those thoughts:

The issue about a woman cooking for her man:

All we can say is that a good woman DOES cook for her man. We are not saying that she should be forced to do this. That wouldn’t be the type of woman that most guys would want anyway. All we are saying is that when a woman cooks it’s a good sign that she is nurturing and that she has accepted her nature. This is clearly what most of us men want. In the family unit women make better nurturers and men make better providers. As a man you can’t let your right as a provider be taken away from you.

A man that is a true provider will tell you that there is no greater reward and feeling than seeing his little woman happy and possibly his children as well. It is also rewarding for a man to be the protector of his family. A real man would destroy anyone who dares disturb his adobe without thought. The feminist wants to take this away from you. Don’t let them. Be the man and don’t be afraid to be discriminatory when you select your mate. For every 50 women there is one that will appeal to you. So don’t be afraid to discard those that are of no use to you.

On a personal note, I can recall when I used to listen to what women said they wanted. There was a woman I was with that was a partial feminist. The more I was with her the more she tried to make me feel useless. She tried to take away everything that felt natural to me away. After a short time I had about enough and “nexted” her ass. I would encourage you to next any girl that thinks this way.

For those that want a crossbreeding, amorphous, appeal to both sexes kind of situation. All the power to you and to each 'its' own. All I have to say is good luck with that. I hope it makes you happy. Just don’t expect to be as happy as the man that fully provides for his woman and protects her, and don’t expect get respect from her for being a provider. She will try to take that way from you because she thinks she can do just as good a job.

As for the issue of roles:
If you had a large corporation would you give everyone the exact same job? If you did nothing would get done and there would be no one specialized enough or focused enough to make the company function. It wouldn’t make sense to make the financial director do the job of the marketing director and force the marketing director to handle the accounts. This is also true within the family unit. The problem is that women are told now at a young age that they can ignore their basic instincts. They are told that they should completely ignore their natural gifts and talents and strive to be more like a man. This is a disaster to the natural order of things and is why the divorce rate is so high. Women have been told to act a certain way and it is in direct conflict with their nature. This is the primary cause of why women don’t know what they want. A woman that accepts her role in the world is happy and isn’t confused. She is also the type of woman a man will give a ring to.

It is important note that a man should not treat a woman as the inferior. Women are not slaves. It is important to create an environment where the natural instincts of both sexes rise to their full potential, the nurturing woman and the man who is the natural provider.

As a side note, I would also like to point out that a man should never use the term “relationship”. Women talk about the “relationship” as if it was some kind of sacred entity between two people. When you are with your woman there is no such thing as ‘the relationship’. Your only thought should be that of your partner not “the relationship”. For a man “the relationship” doesn’t exist, it’s a stupid fema-nazi concept.

BTW, we have to admit that there were some inequalities in the past with regard to rights and freedoms for women. But that was the nature of those decades for all types of people. The last 50 years or so of feminism has caused great harm to the family and has created the abundance of AFCs that we all distain. Now I’m not saying that society hasn’t benefited in some way from feminism(although, i can't think of any ways it has at the moment), it’s just to point out the huge problems it has caused. It is also important to note that feminism is only a recent concept. When compared to the centuries of wisdom that created the family unit and our biological instincts, this foolishness will not stand the test of time. As men we know that all the gains in name of feminism where only achieved because we said it was ok. As men we know that we are always in control of the world (because in the end physical might gives us the power). The question for all of us is, is how much rope are we going to give them? Have we given them enough to hang themselves with yet? I can only guarantee that if they continue to feminize our culture there will be a great backlash. Men will be filled with rage and utter contempt for all this stupidly. The very need for this message board is rather sad. I suspect that this backlash has already begun.
Bet you are sexually frustrated, that why you come out with all of this crap
 

cazzie

Don Juan
Joined
Jul 15, 2003
Messages
35
Reaction score
0
Re: Re: a woman should cook for her man II

Originally posted by MysteryWoman
Bet you are sexually frustrated, that why you come out with all of this crap
i feel sorry for your boyfriend if you have one.:eek:
 
Top