A Wiki Dj Bible

[Gubby]

Well, what about this... a book on seduction, lifestyle and DJing on Wikia (which if you didn't know works like Wikipedia, where everyone can write and edit articles).

Like the DJ bible, BUT with every important thing you need to know, and every bit of bull**** edited out, leaving only the shiny bits of gold in a structured book format which you can read from the start to the end.

I got the idea from KillaPeteHog here: http://www.sosuave.net/forum/showthread.php?&p=908687#post908687
- he made summary notes of the DJ Bible, because it was too full of bragging and fluff.

Not that it has to be like an encyclopedia, you can still leave in jokes and dumb stuff*, but the main thing is that it is clear and nothing more than what's pertinent. You should get something out of every sentence.

*Yeah, jokes and dumb stuff are pertinent ^^ no-one wants to read a boring book

Well, there's only point if you guys are up for the work. The problem is everytime you post an article it gets hacked apart, so you don't get the ego-boost which we all know is why you come here in the first place.

SO ARE YOU IN? LET ME HEAR YOU PEOPLE!

 

[T Money]

I'm down like James Brown.

 

[Gubby]

I hope that means "yes"

 

[Gubby]

Hey, bump. Isn't anyone else interested?

 

[Docs]

Hacked apart? Do you mean you will take my words and eliminate/change? That's not fair, as what you think could be different from the intent of the article, and thus changing the whole point of the article.

You can't do that anyways, as that's some major copyright infringement. I don't know the exacts, but it's like taking a short story and changing 25 words, taking out a page of paragraphs and blurring the end result.

I understand removing blabber, but if the article takes 4 pages to read, well goddamn let it be.

 

[Gubby]

Not copyright infringement if they let you

I understand removing blabber, but if the article takes 4 pages to read, well goddamn let it be.

Depends...

The idea here is to make a comprehensive DJ book. Take all the important points, address them, put them in order. Using the wiki system to make sure it's constantly improving.

 

[Fender]

Hate to be a "glass is half empty" kinda guy here but I don't think a wiki-DJbible will work.

Theres too many conflicting ideas and idealogies in seduction that it would be impossible to "settle down" on a proper encyclopedia (sp). Just put a "direct" seducer and an "indirect" seducer in a room, and a rumble will almost definately occur.

But you can always try it. G'luck!

 

[I'm Joe Dirt]

I'm interested. I'd definitley contribute to such a project plus I'd be willing to provide some funds for it.

 

[Docs]

Not copyright infringement if they let you

Would you mind counting every unique author in the bible, and every tip you are considering to add?

Now tell me you'll get permission.
And tell me Allen won't be on your case because it says stright in the TOS that everything posted here becomes his property.

Just buggin really, IDK much, but I just wanted to point that out

 

[Gubby]

Hate to be a "glass is half empty" kinda guy here but I don't think a wiki-DJbible will work.

Theres too many conflicting ideas and idealogies in seduction that it would be impossible to "settle down" on a proper encyclopedia (sp). Just put a "direct" seducer and an "indirect" seducer in a room, and a rumble will almost definately occur.

But you can always try it. G'luck!

Yeah. I'm thinking that every debatable point should be labeled as a "perspective" and then in the same page, or on a link, opposing perspectives are made.

 

[Gubby]

Would you mind counting every unique author in the bible, and every tip you are considering to add?

Now tell me you'll get permission.
And tell me Allen won't be on your case because it says stright in the TOS that everything posted here becomes his property.

Just buggin really, IDK much, but I just wanted to point that out

The beauty of this is that if you rewrite something in your own words, or something is reasonably considered as a quote, it's not copyright infringement. I don't (necessarily) mean ripping off the articles straight.

Did David DeAngelo come with a vengeance to legally destroy everyone who explained C&F on this forum? Come to think of it, this website wouldn't be around without basic information which at some point was ripped off the first (commercial) PUAs.

 

[Marlimus]

...And who is this newb, this gubby, who thinks he can take it upon himself to speak for the Don Juan community, when there are others far more senior? Who is this great editor?

 

[Gubby]

...And who is this newb, this gubby, who thinks he can take it upon himself to speak for the Don Juan community, when there are others far more senior? Who is this great editor?

Marcus Aurelius, Emperor of Rome.

On your knees and grovel, citizen.

 

[I-am-someone]

A wiki is absolutely suited for the DJ bible. It's a system that was built to allow people to enhance content in a positive way, and increasing the amount of energy that can be put into it.

However! I would advise never to allow the public to just modify it. It would have to be edited by people who have proven themselves in one way or another. If every moron could edit it, it would become a rotten bible in no-time.

 

[Docs]

The beauty of this is that if you rewrite something in your own words, or something is reasonably considered as a quote, it's not copyright infringement.

Yes, that is true. But that's still hundreds of articles to rewrite totally.

 

[Gubby]

Yes, that is true. But that's still hundreds of articles to rewrite totally.

Are you suggesting that hard work is a bad thing? Cummon you're just niggling and you know it

You don't know me very well so I can forgive you... but those who know me know that I'm ALWAYS right.

 

[Docs]

Are you suggesting that hard work is a bad thing? Cummon you're just niggling and you know it

Of course hard work is a bad thing!

You don't know me very well so I can forgive you... but those who know me know that I'm ALWAYS right.

I hope I never know you then, or else you'd be right

 

[Marlimus]

Marcus Aurelius, Emperor of Rome.

On your knees and grovel, citizen.

:crackup: lol
ah boy, Gubby, you just made my day. Well done!!!

 

[Gubby]

Okay... Flippinfreak pointed me to the mASF wiki: http://www.fastseduction.com/cgi-bin/fswiki.cgi?HomePage

Supposedly that's meant to mean it's not worth bothering with our own version... but personally I'd say that that there isn't really any better than any other free resource on the net... but a lot worse.

Anyhowww... this is a DJ production here.. drawing off the vast wisdom of the DJB and the "DJ" philosophy.

Yes, some people don't agree with me on the DJ vs. PUA ideology but I think it's something that makes this community unique and valuable. This, in contrast to the mASF wiki, would be a book on becoming a "Real Man" that naturally attracts women (without dishonesty or manipulation) and has a more generally well-rounded life - with outer game and social understanding not neglected, naturally.

"The point of PUA is women. The point of DJ is life."

While I've put forth the "perspective" idea for other things, that would be the purpose of this proposed book... because plain seduction is common, DJ is unique.

Anyone else want to get pissed with me now?

 

[flippinfreak]

:cuss:NOOOOO! You were supposed to get discouraged and quit you idiot!