Pearl’s content can be summed up as 1) women such, and 2) only men with extreme leverage should marry; ordinary men shouldn’t. Just repeat that for hours and that’s her content. That’s not helpful.
Did anyone ever take Roosh especially seriously?
Women who identify as Red Pilled(Female MRAs included)are cut from the same mold as Woke White people, who believe they're doing God's work, by ruminating on their alleged "Privilege" and the evils of "Structural Racism"
People took Roosh seriously enough that he could write books/blogs and made a living of that for over a decade, Roosh blog from 2009-2012 had far more value than Pearl or any other RP creator that's on youtube right now, it's the same shyt over and over again which is not helping young men to win with women but rather to avoid them
Much of what she says about female anti-social behavior and divorce law is true. But my guy sense tells me she is yet another red piller who seeks to extinct the middle 60-percent of men.
Neil F Scott(Who coined the term Nice Guy Syndrome), Ross Jefferies, Asa Baber, Robert Glover, Marc Rudov, David DeAngelo, Bobby Rio, Scott McKay, and s-it tons of folks were discussing these subjects, eons before anyone started mistaking a popcorn movie from The 90s for reality
In the same way much of what the male feminist says about the risk of sexual assault for women increasing during drunken frat parties is true, sure. None of this is remotely original though, and the efforts we've been engaged since '16 to put an academic veneer over this stuff has ultimately proven to be a regression in our thinking
What does that have to do with my argument? my point still stands Pearl and the RP sucks in 2024
Didn't think we were arguing. In any case, I'm simply pointing out that so-called "Red Pill Knowledge and Philosophy" isn't anything new. And I'm not convinced that The Manosphere(Roosh included)'s insistence on mimicking The Woke Left, by speaking exclusively in jargon and thinking in deliberately vague, amorphous concepts, has been especially beneficial
All of us moderns can benefit from reading Gaitskill's "On Not Being A Victim", especially the following portion:
There will always be a cohort of the human race who encounters words such as these:
I'm continually astounded, each time I encounter a card-carrying Red Piller who swears that the belief system he(sometimes she, in the case of the failed artists and avowed a-sclowns over at Honey Badger Radio, Janice Fiamengo, Pearl, etc) operates under doesn't share several million similarities with PC/Wokeness, even though everything Gaitskill describes in that essay is just as applicable to them as it these blockheads 
In hindsight, my putting a . between "PC/Wokeness" and "even" would of made for easier reading, this is true. Good eye, Pilgrim
Ironically enough, much of what Fiamengo(Herself a staunch groupie of one of Red Pill Theology's most prominent exponents: Paul Elam)notes about Andrea Dworkin is no less true of quite a few card-carrying Red Pillers
Another way to think about this:
How are Pearl and Paul Elam, two people who want family-court and marriage reform, degenerate? I’m a long-time listener of Paul Elam. I’m not fond of Pearl.
Elam(A failed drug counselor, who achieved 15 minutes of fame by recycling Tom Leykis's act, minus the fun. He also plagiarized large sections of Rollo Tommasi, Milo Yiannopolous, and s-itloads of other folks's work, then promptly slandered many of these same folks he plagiarized. Tommassi included)opposes making shared parenting in the event of divorce the law of the land, and favors a return to what existed prior to no fault divorce, even though this would keep many men trapped in marriages to psycho b-tches. His rationale? We need to resurrect a vision of the nuclear family that never existed anywhere, outside of 50s sitcoms like Leave It To Beaver
