CornbreadFed
Master Don Juan
Criteria- 5 being the highest, 0 being the lowest
Amount of Single Women-
Logistics & Activities-
Quality of women- Are the women picky, do they type-max, do they have inflated egos?
S Tier- If you can’t get laid in these cities then it is definitely you. These cities
New York City- 15 - NYC shouldn't be debatable, as it is the largest city in the country with plenty of single women to date. In addition, NYC is diverse, so you are not limited to a specific niche or type of woman.
Chicago- 14- Deducted a point due to the winters and Chicago being flat. Pretty similar to NYC
A Tier- With some adjustments, you should be fine!
Los Angeles- LA is quite similar to NYC and Chicago, but it does have a unique vibe that may not resonate with everyone. Additionally, among the big three, the women in LA are considered to be the pickiest.
B Tier- These cities can be bad, but once you find a way to exploit them they are good. They might offer some headaches, but these cities beat the lower ranked and secondary cities though.
Washington DC 13- I sense you might be questioning this post. In DC, being a decent and masculine guy is an advantage, as many competitors tend to be pajama boy try-hard political types. Despite the feminist image, women in DC are likely to overlook that if they find you attractive.
Houston- 10- There are plenty of single women, but the logistics can be challenging, and you may need to sift through a lot of individuals with questionable behavior in this area.
Miami- 12- Plenty of hot single women, activities to do, but the women are picky AF and typemax for rich guys, machismo latino guys, or jacked six pack bro guys. Miami can sometimes feel like paradise or a headache.
Austin- 11- Austin has hot and single women, but the infrastructure is a nightmare(probably worst one on this list) and the girls tend to typemax for the liberal weekend warrior look or Good Ole Boy Texan look. Otherwise, with some grit and grind you should be fine here.
Atlanta- 12.5- Everything is good here, but you are pretty much limited to black or white women and the white women can be mid at best here.
C Tier- These are mid-rated cities, each with its pros and cons.
San Francisco 7 - San Francisco is a sizable city, but the dating scene heavily leans towards white tech bros and wealthy foreign Asians, in addition to an already subpar quality of the dating pool. The city's population and location are the only factors elevating it to a C-tier ranking.
Minneapolis 9.5 - Gets really cold, but you shouldn't have any issues getting laid here.
Dallas 8.5 - Pretty similar to Houston, but Houston has a better vibe and hotter women IMHO.
Phoenix 8 - A woman living in Phoenix has more than likely been humbled, buttt there's a reason she's not in California or somewhere else. The quality of women takes a hit here. The true core of the Big Sky country and Southwest are some rough looking women.
Charlotte 9 - Pretty much Atlanta lite, and might be the most under appreciated city on this list aside from DC.
Hard Mode-
If you happen to move to these cities, I'll keep you in my prayers, and it might be wise to consider getting a credit card that offers points on lotion purchases.
Seattle 5 - I deviated from the rules with Seattle and assigned the women a -5. While the nature and logistics are exceptional, the women in the Pacific Northwest are perceived as not particularly attractive and are thought to have challenging attitudes. Moreover, there's a tendency for them to heavily favor white Patagonia REI bros, so best of luck in that regard.
Nashville 4 - Essentially, Nashville is like Seattle's southern cousin. There are plenty of single women and numerous activities to enjoy. However, the competition for women is arguably the most intense among any city mentioned. It's not uncommon to observe individuals considered highly attractive (Chads) dating women who might be perceived as less attractive (5s) because they are seeking long-term relationships. With the average woman having access to attractive men, it tends to inflate their egos.os.
Las Vegas 0 - This might be a biased assumption, but I can't fathom how any guy could have a decent sex life in Vegas. From my observations, I didn't come across many attractive women outside of workers, and the culture seems to be characterized by a deplorable bro fest.
Denver 6.5- To be honest, I didn't know where to place this city. It appears to be a hybrid of Nashville and the Pacific Northwest. I see both positive and negative aspects in this city, but my inclination is to categorize Denver as "hard mode," so to speak.
WHY WASN"T THIS CITY MENTIONED!?! The reason certain cities like Philadelphia and Boston weren't mentioned could be due to A) a lack of personal experience or information about them or B) they are considered irrelevant and not worth discussing.
Amount of Single Women-
Logistics & Activities-
Quality of women- Are the women picky, do they type-max, do they have inflated egos?
S Tier- If you can’t get laid in these cities then it is definitely you. These cities
New York City- 15 - NYC shouldn't be debatable, as it is the largest city in the country with plenty of single women to date. In addition, NYC is diverse, so you are not limited to a specific niche or type of woman.
Chicago- 14- Deducted a point due to the winters and Chicago being flat. Pretty similar to NYC
A Tier- With some adjustments, you should be fine!
Los Angeles- LA is quite similar to NYC and Chicago, but it does have a unique vibe that may not resonate with everyone. Additionally, among the big three, the women in LA are considered to be the pickiest.
B Tier- These cities can be bad, but once you find a way to exploit them they are good. They might offer some headaches, but these cities beat the lower ranked and secondary cities though.
Washington DC 13- I sense you might be questioning this post. In DC, being a decent and masculine guy is an advantage, as many competitors tend to be pajama boy try-hard political types. Despite the feminist image, women in DC are likely to overlook that if they find you attractive.
Houston- 10- There are plenty of single women, but the logistics can be challenging, and you may need to sift through a lot of individuals with questionable behavior in this area.
Miami- 12- Plenty of hot single women, activities to do, but the women are picky AF and typemax for rich guys, machismo latino guys, or jacked six pack bro guys. Miami can sometimes feel like paradise or a headache.
Austin- 11- Austin has hot and single women, but the infrastructure is a nightmare(probably worst one on this list) and the girls tend to typemax for the liberal weekend warrior look or Good Ole Boy Texan look. Otherwise, with some grit and grind you should be fine here.
Atlanta- 12.5- Everything is good here, but you are pretty much limited to black or white women and the white women can be mid at best here.
C Tier- These are mid-rated cities, each with its pros and cons.
San Francisco 7 - San Francisco is a sizable city, but the dating scene heavily leans towards white tech bros and wealthy foreign Asians, in addition to an already subpar quality of the dating pool. The city's population and location are the only factors elevating it to a C-tier ranking.
Minneapolis 9.5 - Gets really cold, but you shouldn't have any issues getting laid here.
Dallas 8.5 - Pretty similar to Houston, but Houston has a better vibe and hotter women IMHO.
Phoenix 8 - A woman living in Phoenix has more than likely been humbled, buttt there's a reason she's not in California or somewhere else. The quality of women takes a hit here. The true core of the Big Sky country and Southwest are some rough looking women.
Charlotte 9 - Pretty much Atlanta lite, and might be the most under appreciated city on this list aside from DC.
Hard Mode-
If you happen to move to these cities, I'll keep you in my prayers, and it might be wise to consider getting a credit card that offers points on lotion purchases.
Seattle 5 - I deviated from the rules with Seattle and assigned the women a -5. While the nature and logistics are exceptional, the women in the Pacific Northwest are perceived as not particularly attractive and are thought to have challenging attitudes. Moreover, there's a tendency for them to heavily favor white Patagonia REI bros, so best of luck in that regard.
Nashville 4 - Essentially, Nashville is like Seattle's southern cousin. There are plenty of single women and numerous activities to enjoy. However, the competition for women is arguably the most intense among any city mentioned. It's not uncommon to observe individuals considered highly attractive (Chads) dating women who might be perceived as less attractive (5s) because they are seeking long-term relationships. With the average woman having access to attractive men, it tends to inflate their egos.os.
Las Vegas 0 - This might be a biased assumption, but I can't fathom how any guy could have a decent sex life in Vegas. From my observations, I didn't come across many attractive women outside of workers, and the culture seems to be characterized by a deplorable bro fest.
Denver 6.5- To be honest, I didn't know where to place this city. It appears to be a hybrid of Nashville and the Pacific Northwest. I see both positive and negative aspects in this city, but my inclination is to categorize Denver as "hard mode," so to speak.
WHY WASN"T THIS CITY MENTIONED!?! The reason certain cities like Philadelphia and Boston weren't mentioned could be due to A) a lack of personal experience or information about them or B) they are considered irrelevant and not worth discussing.
, so it will be OVER for WeekendSkiCels. A lot of folks there seem to just go stay in the mountains Fri & Sat night, and so the afternoon traffic west was bad (but still great going east). The time to go from Golden (i.e., the last suburb until the interstate goes into the mountains) to Copper Mountain (right on the interstate) was only about an hour on clear-weather weekdays (which is when I would do the drive