Women don't care about your struggles. They wait at the finish line and pick the winners

[self_is_an_illusion]

The statement "Women don't care about your struggles. They wait at the finish line and pick the winners" can be interpreted as a reflection of evolutionary psychology and certain historical patterns.

From an evolutionary psychology perspective, one could argue that women, like all human beings, have been shaped by evolutionary pressures to seek out partners who display signs of being able to provide resources and protection. This is sometimes referred to as "mate selection strategy," which suggests that women are evolutionarily predisposed to be attracted to men who have, or are likely to attain, high status, resources, and protection capabilities. This would be linked to the "struggle" as a proxy for the ability to overcome obstacles and achieve status and resources.

Historical evidence might include the ways in which societal structures have positioned men as providers and competitors for resources and status. In many cultures, women's socio-economic status and survival have been linked to the status of their male partners, incentivizing women to select mates who have already demonstrated success. For instance, in medieval societies, marriage alliances were often about consolidating power and wealth, and these strategic marriages were often arranged based on the perceived "winner" in terms of resources and status rather than on mutual struggle.

In biology, the concept of sexual selection speaks to the idea that certain traits become more common not because they increase survival, but because they are attractive to the opposite sex. In many species, females select males based on certain desirable traits that are indicators of genetic fitness.

For a modern example, one could look at the phenomenon of "celebrity worship," where individuals (of any gender) may be more inclined to admire and desire individuals who have achieved a certain level of success or notoriety. While not exclusive to women, this could be cited as an example of people being attracted to those perceived as "winners" in society's view.

 

[AmsterdamAssassin]

So?

 

[self_is_an_illusion]

So?

Don’t get butt hurt when you don’t get what you want

 

[AmsterdamAssassin]

Don’t get butt hurt when you don’t get what you want

I'll keep it in mind.

 

[Bigpapa]

The statement "Women don't care about your struggles. They wait at the finish line and pick the winners" can be interpreted as a reflection of evolutionary psychology and certain historical patterns.

From an evolutionary psychology perspective, one could argue that women, like all human beings, have been shaped by evolutionary pressures to seek out partners who display signs of being able to provide resources and protection. This is sometimes referred to as "mate selection strategy," which suggests that women are evolutionarily predisposed to be attracted to men who have, or are likely to attain, high status, resources, and protection capabilities. This would be linked to the "struggle" as a proxy for the ability to overcome obstacles and achieve status and resources.

Historical evidence might include the ways in which societal structures have positioned men as providers and competitors for resources and status. In many cultures, women's socio-economic status and survival have been linked to the status of their male partners, incentivizing women to select mates who have already demonstrated success. For instance, in medieval societies, marriage alliances were often about consolidating power and wealth, and these strategic marriages were often arranged based on the perceived "winner" in terms of resources and status rather than on mutual struggle.

In biology, the concept of sexual selection speaks to the idea that certain traits become more common not because they increase survival, but because they are attractive to the opposite sex. In many species, females select males based on certain desirable traits that are indicators of genetic fitness.

For a modern example, one could look at the phenomenon of "celebrity worship," where individuals (of any gender) may be more inclined to admire and desire individuals who have achieved a certain level of success or notoriety. While not exclusive to women, this could be cited as an example of people being attracted to those perceived as "winners" in society's view.

the whole post is retarded

women do not care about the struggles that men have because they are hooked on social media where everything is perfect + when they are down they just go on tinder and get 2-3k likes

imagine if you would have an endless line of women wanting to talk with you, you will behave the same

“ I think that she does not smile enough. I like girls that smile more “ - or any other bullsh1t reason - . Oh well such a shame, I guess that I will think about while talking with other girls

the main problem with women these days is that they are extremely spoiled. They are so spoiled that they do not even know what having a hard time is + society in general does not have any expectations from there from any angle anymore

for them is a big drama if the cute boy does not talk to them or that they did not find whatever dress the size that they have

for us guys who have to go through sh1t all day, small things that women take for granted give a lot of pleasure

inexperienced guys have the same line of thinking that women have, just that they do not have the same abundance

 

[Bigpapa]

I believe OP want to emphasize that the lack of care isnt only relationship based, but can also be work based or in any other way. I worked with around 400-500 HRs in coorporation with other companies, majority of them are woman and I can tell you with confidence that they do a lot fishy things. I planned to conduct a study about it, but this would be detrimental for my reputation and my mail account would be flooding with misogynie accusations from woman.

They dont really care about the wellbeing of the workers, their decisions are incredibly biased and the most worst decision makers I ever met in my life. I also know for fact that woman who work in HR, dont prefer Men working in HR they rather hire woman even if they dont have the necessary qualification. They are terrible in hiring and long term decisions, lack accountability and moral.

Woman in HR are less likely to hire someone who is better then them for the HR role, so to have the Power. They are aware of their lack of accountability and laziness in business settings and the last thing they want is someone who wants to do it the right, ethically and the morally productive right way.

Ever seen Job posts where it was clearly stated that they would hire someone with no experience for a certain role such as an internship? Thats a **** test, they always want someone experienced

Ever seen Job posts where People with disability would get accepted? Thats a **** test, these postings are only there to make the company and the HR look great

Ever seen a job post but they actually never hired someone and didnt even take one glance at your resume? (Majority of them are marketing themself, they dont want to hire anyone or used it to their advantage to say that they couldnt find someone, to get more money)

Ever seen Job posts that emphasize diversity and inclusion? So, you care about a healthy environment, they dont want you.


The only companies I have huge respect for is so far only Amazon and Tesla. Great Leaders, Great People and amazing support

The most worst companies consisting of Narcissists, Mercedes Benz and Siemens. I dont recommend anyone working with them

I do not think that women in corporations are any other different than men in corporations in the vast majority of cases

corporations by default are toxic environments where you have to have sociopathic tendencies in order not to be mentally destroyed by the toxicity

as you have a lot of examples with women, I have a lot of examples with men ( especially in small or middle leadership positions with some examples of the senior management )

 

[CornbreadFed]

If this was true at all, I would still be a virgin.

 

[AmsterdamAssassin]

If this was true at all, I would still be a virgin.

You're not?

 

[CornbreadFed]

You're not?

I have never touched a female titty before actually.

 

[AmsterdamAssassin]

I have never touched a female titty before actually.

There's nothing wrong with being gay.

 

[Pierce Manhammer]

Ugh LMM-generated text is so easy to spot.

p.s. Unplugged Alpha quotes are so goche.

 

[Bokanovsky]

If you're actually a winner, you get to pick women at the finish line, not the other way around.

 

[Bigpapa]

If you're actually a winner, you get to pick women at the finish line, not the other way around.

if that would be the truth then only a minority of guys would get laid

if you would go out you would actually see a decent amount of men having gfs

now if the relationships are good or not, that is a different story all together but for sure they get laid at least occasionally even on a sh1t one

incels are actually a minority that is very loud

 

[parabellum]

What I have experienced is that they care about your struggles and can go to the extend of supporting you significantly as long as you show that you keep yourself actively carrying on.

off topic but related, so many things, including human relationships, can’t be completely and indefinitely good. Your best chance is balancing good and bad stuff so you keep yourself on the positive side of things as much as possible. If we could get every poster to at least consider this line of thought, I am willing to bet that we would have a more efficient sosuave.

 

[Bokanovsky]

if that would be the truth then only a minority of guys would get laid

if you would go out you would actually see a decent amount of men having gfs

now if the relationships are good or not, that is a different story all together but for sure they get laid at least occasionally even on a sh1t one

incels are actually a minority that is very loud

I think you misunderstood my point. I didn't say that losers don't have girlfriends.

 

[BillyPilgrim]

There's nothing wrong with being gay.

He;s a minority so in America he qualifies for sympathy.

 

[AmsterdamAssassin]

He;s a minority so in America he qualifies for sympathy.

Over here they are everywhere, so we hardly even notice them anymore.

 

[BillyPilgrim]

Over here they are everywhere, so we hardly even notice them anymore.

I don't know how the media is in Europe, but in America there's a subtle push for white women to date and generally look more favorable on them then white men, so long as the minority guy endorses leftist views, which Corn does. So I imagine that's a factor at play for him, and I have to point these out since he appears to be on the spectrum with how stubborn he is, lol.

 

[CornbreadFed]

I don't know how the media is in Europe, but in America there's a subtle push for white women to date and generally look more favorable on them then white men, so long as the minority guy endorses leftist views, which Corn does. So I imagine that's a factor at play for him, and I have to point these out since he appears to be on the spectrum with how stubborn he is, lol.

I do not date American white women because it is mainly the trashy leftovers or ones with leftist agendas that date black men. Black American men are better off dating Latinas, Middle Easterners/Indians, and Asians if they choose to go the interracial path.

 

[BillyPilgrim]

I do not date American white women because it is mainly the trashy leftovers or ones with leftist agendas that date black men. Black American men are better off dating Latinas, Middle Easterners/Indians, and Asians if they choose to go the interracial path.

My bad, I had forgotten that (even though its in your damn avatar) It's good you get some breathing room to be real and human, everyone can use that.