Study: Almost 2/3 of Tinder Users are already in a relationship...

[BackInTheGame78]

Not exactly surprising...

Basically a lot of people who are married/have SO's looking to cheat or people who are lonely and just want attention...

This explains a lot of why so many get poor results...a lot of these people are not looking to actually go on dates in the first place.

Most Tinder users are already in a relationship, new survey finds

Nearly two-thirds of Tinder users surveyed said they were already in relationships; some of them were married while they were using the app.

www.nbcnews.com

 

[MatureDJ]

It's OVER for TinderCels.

 

[MixedMutt00]

I've never been a fan of Tinder or online dating. I think pictures of me are terrible and I'm more attractive in person, both physically and with the bonus of my personality (and game lmao). Text game is hard for me cuz I'm boring and disinterested online; in person I can laugh or crack a joke/make eye contact .

Even if you're nervous, always approach. Odds are, she's (or he) is more nervous than you and you get the Confidence points, even if you stutter.

 

[Gamisch]

Not exactly surprising...

Basically a lot of people who are married/have SO's looking to cheat or people who are lonely and just want attention...

This explains a lot of why so many get poor results...a lot of these people are not looking to actually go on dates in the first place.

Most Tinder users are already in a relationship, new survey finds

Nearly two-thirds of Tinder users surveyed said they were already in relationships; some of them were married while they were using the app.

www.nbcnews.com

Yeah , monkeybranching. Seems like lots of people tend to (as they say in my native language) buy new shoes before throwing away their old ones.

So soon as there's some kind of struggle people will start to set up a exit strategy because they CANNOT be alone.

2/3 also makes me wonder what's the Male /female ratio. Imo men are more likely to wait until the ship is completely sunken, whereas women rather monkeybranche and make sure they have a new nest. So we already knew that there are more men than women using OLD. Now we can add this fact to the equation.

Great find though. Makes even more sense to why it's so hard to date via OLD. Especially when you are desperate for poosy.

 

[DeCarlo]

I talked about this with a friend.
We came to the conclusion the window for when people are actaully looking to meet people is very very small. Like within a week or two they'll be off there.
The other 2/3s want validation, attention or play games.

Lastly, being in a 'relationship' doesnt mean **** nowadays.

 

[Pierce Manhammer]

The only times I’ve found anyone worth my time on OLD is right when they pop on for the first time after a breakup or divorce.

Match, chat, move to text, meet, shag.

You have to move them off fast before the candy store effect sets in, you have to almost bombard them.

 

[BackInTheGame78]

I talked about this with a friend.
We came to the conclusion the window for when people are actaully looking to meet people is very very small. Like within a week or two they'll be off there.
The other 2/3s want validation, attention or play games.

Lastly, being in a 'relationship' doesnt mean **** nowadays.

I've never used Tinder because I have heard crappy things about it but Bumble and Hinge were really good for me. POF and OKC used to be really good but suck now.

 

[RobbyDog]

The only times I’ve found anyone worth my time on OLD is right when they pop on for the first time after a breakup or divorce.

Match, chat, move to text, meet, shag.

You have to move them off fast before the candy store effect sets in, you have to almost bombard them.

I’ve experienced the same thing.

 

[SW15]

Not exactly surprising...

Basically a lot of people who are married/have SO's looking to cheat or people who are lonely and just want attention...

This explains a lot of why so many get poor results...a lot of these people are not looking to actually go on dates in the first place.

It's a part of why people get poor results. I would like to see the breakout by biological sex. I think more of the males on Tinder (Tinder is a sausage fest at 76% male) are genuinely single. I think a lot of those women on Tinder are more likely to be already in relationships and seeking validation.

Bumble and Hinge are also sausage fests at 65% male. I also think a lot of women on Bumble and Hinge are also non-serious women seeking validation.

These apps are not solutions if the populace on the apps isn't single and seeking new penis. A man has the option of approaching in real world spots like the mall, grocery store, or gym/fitness classes. With these options, he's interacting with the general populace and a lot of women in the general populace have non-marital boyfriends or husbands. That's a big downside of day game is that a lot of women aren't actually in the market. There is time waste in day game because of this.

In theory, nightlife venues are supposed to solve the time waste issue I identified from daygame but it really doesn't. In theory, one would think that women going to nightlife venues would be more likely to be seeking new penis than women randomly in a mall, but nightlife approachers like @oldmanofthesea and some others have stated in the past that there are time wasters in relationships in nightlife venues too. I have also had some of these experience in nightlife venue approaching over the years too.

 

[I_have_BDE]

I've never used Tinder because I have heard crappy things about it but Bumble and Hinge were really good for me. POF and OKC used to be really good but suck now.

Tinder bought pof and okc and neutered them too. Pof only one message per day now.

Most of the girls on tinder are ugly or fat so if someone wants to cheat with them have at it hoss!

 

[SW15]

Tinder bought pof and okc and neutered them too. Pof only one message per day now.

Match Group owns Tinder, Hinge, Match, OkC, and PoF.

Men need to pay on all of those. Free versions don't do shiit for men. Men would need to pay for the unlimited swipes on Tinder or Hinge to get enough volume of matches with most men having a sub 1% matching rate on their right swipes.

It's way better to go into the real world and do approaches.

 

[BackInTheGame78]

Tinder bought pof and okc and neutered them too. Pof only one message per day now.

Most of the girls on tinder are ugly or fat so if someone wants to cheat with them have at it hoss!

That explains it.

 

[BackInTheGame78]

Match Group owns Tinder, Hinge, Match, OkC, and PoF.

Men need to pay on all of those. Free versions don't do shiit for men. Men would need to pay for the unlimited swipes on Tinder or Hinge to get enough volume of matches with most men having a sub 1% matching rate on their right swipes.

It's way better to go into the real world and do approaches.

I never paid on Hinge...actually it was the opposite. Women had to pay from what they told me.

 

[Bigpapa]

Not exactly surprising...

Basically a lot of people who are married/have SO's looking to cheat or people who are lonely and just want attention...

This explains a lot of why so many get poor results...a lot of these people are not looking to actually go on dates in the first place.

Most Tinder users are already in a relationship, new survey finds

Nearly two-thirds of Tinder users surveyed said they were already in relationships; some of them were married while they were using the app.

www.nbcnews.com

this is what I kept saying for a while now, most of the women on tinder ( at least the decent looking ones and onwards ) are not really there for the sake of meeting a guy, and most of them rarely go out with someone

most of the girls that I have met online said that they rarely rarely go out with someone . Most of them averaging like 2-3 dates in total since they signed up there ( in most cases on and off for years )

Online dating mainly has something remotely f8cked about it and that is logistics ( not that many are interested in actually finding s guy to begin with ) . Unless ofc the guy is out of her league

so as an idea, girls will mainly attention wh0re

 

[MixedMutt00]

Surprisingly though, I have a couple of female friends that **** laaame azz dudes on Tinder, like bums with nothing going for them (except their looks and stroke game I guess). So I guess if you're hot it'll work maybe? But for me, well I have my hand rip

 

[Bigpapa]

Corroborate also with this

- YouTube

Enjoy the videos and music you love, upload original content, and share it all with friends, family, and the world on YouTube.

youtube.com

 

[I_have_BDE]

Match Group owns Tinder, Hinge, Match, OkC, and PoF.

Men need to pay on all of those. Free versions don't do shiit for men. Men would need to pay for the unlimited swipes on Tinder or Hinge to get enough volume of matches with most men having a sub 1% matching rate on their right swipes.

It's way better to go into the real world and do approaches.

Probably only allows users a certain amount of replies too. Even their hallmark site, Match they neutered it. Like you don't even know if it's a free account you're messaging and if it is they won't even see your message unless you pay for yet another extra feature.

Match stock was tanking post covid. It's driving people away from their OLD sites now that covid is over and people meeting more normal now. OLD sites worked fine until Match bought them up. Match former workers even admitted many of the profiles are fake and they would make old profiles look active and bumped to the top. Hence the justice dept was going after them. As I said before, before 2021 it wasn't that hard to get replies even on the free dating sites. They neutered them, pay walls, and post covid is making them obsolete. That's why you're seeing more fat girls, ugly girls, and trannies on them. They're low end and need OLD. Cute girls don't need OLD.

 

[MixedMutt00]

Surprisingly though, I have a couple of female friends that **** laaame azz dudes on Tinder, like bums with nothing going for them (except their looks and stroke game I guess). So I guess if you're hot it'll work maybe? But for me, well I have my hand rip

Actually, thinking about it, it's actually 2 female friends and they both have low self esteem one thinks she's a 6 at best but she's by God definitely at least a 7.5, I think an 8.5 including her amazing personality as well. Strange huh

 

[Machine10033]

I’ve never had any dating profiles but I have found this when talking to girls when I’m out. I would honestly say if you chat up 10 married girls 6 or so will attempt a monkey branch. They will feel you out.... “ so your married? yes.... how bout you? “ehhh if you want to call it that”... or something expressing trouble in their marriage. If you entertain their bs and continue down this dangerous path you will often find out they have been tinder or dating accounts. As a matter of fact it’s exceedingly rare to find any female out in a social setting with her girl friends that will say something positive about their relationship.

 

[Bigpapa]

I’ve never had any dating profiles but I have found this when talking to girls when I’m out. I would honestly say if you chat up 10 married girls 6 or so will attempt a monkey branch. They will feel you out.... “ so your married? yes.... how bout you? “ehhh if you want to call it that”... or something expressing trouble in their marriage. If you entertain their bs and continue down this dangerous path you will often find out they have been tinder or dating accounts. As a matter of fact it’s exceedingly rare to find any female out in a social setting with her girl friends that will say something positive about their relationship.

Girls in long term relationships are way easier to be seduced ( if they are not in love with their bf ) than girls who are single, mainly because the competition is not the same

I do not think that is the correct comparison