So we are somewhat agreeing that women are withdrawing from dating and relationships to a greater and greater degree.
All of this is a trend which is little spoken of. You have to think in terms of social trends. 15 or so years ago, with women learning about sex and the hookup market, and sexual liberation ie Samantha from Sex and City, you had girls thinking its cool to have sex with Chad while waiting for Mr Right to sweep them off their feet in a romantic monogamous way.
Now, us men, we all have one gripe. Why should any of us provide long term value, or wait for sex, when some guy, chad, tyrone, or whatver has been getting laid on the first date or with mininal effort or work in a ONS.
The sexual behaviours of women have been manipulative and destructive. The best guys are not getting laid the most. So, the system is broken. You cannot have High Quality guys locked-down with one girl and then some chad or player going round having sex with all the attractive women. This is what has been happening for the last 15 years. Hence it has not hit rock bottom, with high quality men unwilling to put the work in and bring long term value cos they are just losing out to Chad who women have been giving hookups too.
Sex needs to stop happening and go to 0. Then, high quality guys can atleast say they are getting some cos it isnt being devalued by Chad or PUAs getting the highest notches.
It means women need to stop playing these games. Stop trying to lock-a-man-down. Women need to make sure the best guys are getting laid the most. That means we in this society need to know which type of guy is the best and that type of guy HAS TO BE getting laid the most.
In short, the system will hit rock-bottom and only being to fix itself when the Natural Heirarchy of Men is established. That means we need to know and have an idea of what is the best type of guy and that type of guy has to be getting laid the most. Otherwise, he has to deprive women of the value that he can bring.
The move is gonna be towards men who create social circles and political groups to bring value to women. This is a long-term process and is a long game that needs to be played. Hence, all the short-term under-cover casual hookups women are doing with low-value guys is gonna have to stop.
Sex will have to go to the best guys. No drama, no games from women. Alpha serious guy, political guy, business guy, 45yr old guys are not gonna be losing in the sexual marketplace to young 25yr old Chads or players.
At the moment, and for the last 15 years, womens desire for LTRs, Marriage, being 'the prize', game-playing and manipulating, insecurity, everything has caused Alpha Quality men to lose out due to the conflict between locking a man down and getting short-term sexual fix by women.
For the women, they have to let go of the idea of being the prize. Since we hit rock-bottom, which we are close to, the womens sexual value will be lowered culturally and the Alpha Males sexual value will be recognised. We will be ably to determine male value hence we can evaluate womens sexual behaviours accordingly. It wont be the case that a guy wins if he sleeps with a woman, it will be that a woman wins if she sleeps with the Alpha. Women cannot be the prize.
Things will only get better for both parties (starting with Alpha Males, Women and then average guys) once it is culturally acknowledged that Alpha Males have higher sexual value than women and beta males.
An example of this. User Catsmeow mentioned of the Pete Davidson and Kim Kardasian hookup, something like whatever Pete Davidsons value atleast he got to **** Kim Kardasian. This is the idea that Pete Davidson got something other men would want. That Kim K is the Prize. This is the old way of thinking, where the woman is the prize and ANY GUY that gets to **** her wins. But this system will hit rock bottom. In the new system, both Pete Davidson and Kim K are losers. Pete Davidsons position in the male heirarchy, ie Game and Alpha value, is known and acknowledged. If it is too low, as it seems, then him sleeping with Kim K does not increase his value, it only lowers hers.
Then user Catsmeow has to know that both Kim K and Pete Davdson are losers in the Game. It is what it is. Women WILL lose sexual value and give up prestige and power and acknowledge the sexual value of the best men, and not attempt to limit it via monogamy. Once the correct heirarchy of male behaviours and sexual value is acknowledged, then everything else will flow down. All men attempting to imitate the best, and the best getting the most. This is will require humility and sincerity from women. A woman cannot **** a lesser guy and then think that the lesser guy will be catapulted above the real Alphas.
