My dad is 73 yo, I'm 33 and his test levels are higher than me. Imagine my shock.
He was a young man when the women still respected men.
A 73 year old in 2022 was born in 1949. A male born in 1949 came of age between 1964-1974, during the era of The Sexual Revolution. The Sexual Revolution was a transitional era. This 1949 born male would have gotten the last vestiges of an era when women respected men.
If a man born in 1949 married before America's Bicennential (July 4, 1976), he had a decent shot of having his marriage work out longer term. In the early to mid 1970s, the typical age for an American male marrying for the first time was around 24, so this typical 1949 male would have been married by the Bicennential, since he would have been 26-27. A first marriage that started in 1975 had a better chance of lasting 40 years than a first marriage that started in 1995, 2005, or 2015. This is why Boomers tended to actually get married, unlike a larger percentage of the generation that
@Pedrito0906 and I belong to (the Millennials).
The Boomers that got married between 1970-1985 had a decent amount of divorces happen in their lifetimes, but they were better positioned for longer term marriages than subsequent generations. The Boomers were not the initial wave of divorcees when no fault divorces started in most US states between 1970-1975, as a large portion of the generation either had not married yet or were still pre-divorcees in the early stages of marriage. The 1970-1975 divorcees were mostly Silent Generation (late 1920s-1945 births).
Boomer beta males were more competitive in the sexual marketplace than Millennial beta males. A Boomer beta male probably ended up married at some point and had decent sexual frequency whereas a Millennial beta male was far more likely to either be incel or experience extended sexual droughts between relationships. For most of the Boomers, being a nice guy wasn't going to doom your sex and relationship life, there was still some value in it, though the late Boomers (1960-1964) didn't experience as much of the good old days as the earlier Boomers (1946-1953).
Gen X was the first generation where some decline was evident, though it didn't really all go to shiit until the Millennials came of age in the late 1990s/2000s. I'd even say the later Gen X'ers (1976-1980 births) didn't get that good of a deal in the sexual marketplace, but still a better one that the 1981-1989 Millennials.
Testosterone is low. Modern men are weak and do little to no manual labor. People also wait too gotdamn long to reproduce. Biologically, we should be pumping out babies in our late teens early 20s.
The increase in autism and other conditions has been linked to later pregnancies as well
I agree that people wait too long to reproduce.
I look at my own situation at 39 right now. If I wanted to reproduce in the next 3 years (39-42), I would need to do it with a woman at least 10 years younger. While women 33+ can get pregnant, the pregnancies are too high risk, especially with 35-40 year old women. In my social circle, I have a bunch of couples with women 32-35 pumping out their "Last Call" first babies with men of similar ages. I don't want to be a 40 year old guy pumping out a first baby with a 38 year old woman. I mention this because I have mainly dated and had sex with childless women close to my age. This is an area of game I need to improve.
Even I were able to get a woman 10+ years younger at this point, I still have to consider my retirement. Having babies between 39-42/43 means that I won't be finished raising them to the point of full independence until my early 60s, depending on their trade school/college plans. If these children had employment issues in their 20s, I'd be into my 60s and might not be able to help them too well. If I am still working in my 60s, I don't want to be dealing with this.
I have yet to mention considerations around the stability of romantic relationships in my life. Besides the pregnancy risks, I would also have a high breakup risk either in marriage or a non-marital relationship with a woman I'd impregnate. I also don't want to deal with this. I don't wish to spend my 40s and 50s co-parenting with an ex.
It probably makes the most amount of sense at this point for me to stay childless. It doesn't matter whether or not I want kids or have had a strong desire to do so. The practical considerations are the priority.
Mark Cuban is 64 right now and still has 2 children under 18, but he's a billionnaire and his wife is 14 years younger.