Igetit!
You're quoting what I'm saying, but you're not really addressing anything. Like the woman who was in a relationship for 3 years and met someone else. You just focused on "spilling your guts" but you never went back to the behavior of the guy she left him for.
That's cause I don't know the behavior of the guy she left him for. There's too many possible variables as to why a woman would leave one relationship to go to someone else.
Maybe the new guy was rich and famous.
Maybe she was cheating for the past three months,then
finally decided to leave her relationship for the new guy.
Maybe she was unhappy in her relationship and she left her boyfriend cause the grass "looked greener" on the other side.
I don't know. For all we know,
SHE could have approached
HIM. Too many variables to account for.
Do you think that guy directly expressed his interest and the woman just up and left her LTR? I want to know your answer.
Again...too many possible scenarios. But do I think a guy could express direct interest and a chick just up and leave her relationship?
NO.
She might cheat,but I can't see her just up and leaving the relationship. My guess would be this.....
He could show interest in a TAKEN girl.....DIRECT interest,and that would cause a few things to happen within the girl. For one,she'd feel desired. Two,the guy's confidence may make her feel attracted to him. Three,since she's already in a relationship,the new guy is "forbidden fruit". That's a lot of NEW emotion swirling around in a girl,versus her somewhat normal,day to day relationship she already has.
No....I don't think a girl would just up and leave a relationship for some guy who just walks up to her showing interest. If he flirted with her OVER TIME......
IN ADDITION TO showing interest the FIRST TIME HE MET HER......then yes,I could see her leaving her relationship for him sometime in the future.
I think your thinking may be influenced by Hollywood and movies. The type scenario where a guy meets a girl who's already in a relationship,he
doesn't show any type of interest in her right off the bat..........just kinda hangs out and is
there,while she's already dating someone.
She spends a few weeks or months complaining about her relationship to the new guy,then she ends her relationship.....and gets with the new guy. That doesn't typically happen. In the movies,yes.....on the LifeTime Network FOR WOMEN....yes. Not in real life.
Then one of your rebuttals was you assuming we're talking about a girl we've never seen before. Where is this coming from?? I never said that in any of my posts. We're talking "friendzone" here. It's in the topic of my thread. I suspect you're well aware of this, but again couldn't offer an explanation, so you had to skirt around the issue.
I'm not trying to skirt around the issue,I'm trying to
UNDERSTAND it.
Generally,whenever someone talks about a girl.....my assumption is they mean someone NEW. I thought you meant dealing with the friendzone in the case of a NEW girl.....someone you don't know. Apparently,you mean with someone you
ALREADY have had some sort of contact with.
My point in mentioning Tinder is that it's a dating app in which guys go DIRECT. As soon as you message them, they know you're interested. No beating around the bush, no chance to land in the dreaded "friendzone". If this is the best approach... we're talking DIRECT vs INDIRECT... why doesn't this work? Why do guys have to swipe hundreds or thousands of times to get matches?
Dude.....this
IS LIFE. That's just how it is. If a hot chick is at a bar,and every 10 minutes a guy approaches her,well what.......you think she's going to say yes and have sex with
all of them? My guess is most are going to get rejected.
I didn't set this up.....this is just how it is.
Look....if you know of a more effective way to gain a girl's interest,TELL ME........I'll listen.
Then maybe they get a reply, maybe they don't. Same thing happens with every other guy.
Just so there's no confusion: We're not debating cold approach vs. dating site vs. social circle game.
We are speaking in terms of DIRECT vs. INDIRECT which ties in with "friendzone", because apparently the only way to avoid it is by directly expressing your interest right away, otherwise she only sees you as a friend.
Sir......there's only TWO WAYS she can see you. You're either having sex with her......
or you're
NOT. There's no in-between here. If you're going to REPEATEDLY be in her presence,laughing and talking with her,but NOT HAVING SEX/OR SHOWING ANY TYPE OF SEXUAL INTEREST........you
WILL get friendzoned.....PEROID. It'll happen BY DEFAULT....because you're BONDING WITH HER ,FRIENDSHIP-WISE through the laughing and talking.
What I'm trying to convey in the big picture here is this...
The problem with going DIRECT (in whatever context you apply it to), is it primarily focuses on YOUR EMOTIONS. You think a girl is pretty, you want her phone number, so you can sleep with her. Just because you feel that way, doesn't mean she feels that way.
SIR.........I
KNOW THIS. All you've done was just prove WHY the direct approach is better.
You say the problem with the direct approach is that it focuses on the guy's emotions...and just because I feel a certain way doesn't mean the girl does. Uhh......yeah...that's part of my point.
You're right.....I don't know HOW the girl feels. But if I express my interest,I'll
immediately know where her feelings are at.
If she agrees,she's interested. If she doesn't agree,she's not. If she tap dances and won't give a clear answer,then I KNOW to move on.
Going indirect is not about a lack of confidence, or being in a zone that doesn't exist, it's about understanding the complexity of human emotions, and DISPLAYING desirable behavior that will raise those emotions in someone else.
Ok,I'll hear you out. And to be clear,you mean going indirect with a chick you ALREADY KNOW......right?
Ok,so about how long should the indirect method take?
I will give you an example of this:
Recently I hung out with this girl. She wanted to bring friends along. I know for a fact most guys here would object to that. In other words, their emotions would have risen. They would have called the girl out on it and insisted on a 1 vs. 1 otherwise it's not a date. Now the woman knows the guys emotions are elevated. I kept my emotions out of the situation because I knew my objective was to raise hers. We met up and hung out with her friends. I didn't flirt, I didn't kino, or any of that. I displayed my social skills through attractive body language, voice tonality, conversational skills, and showing her I know how to have fun. She really started warming up, laughing, and I could tell she didn't want the night to end. That's when I made my move... I told her I had to get going, jumped in my Uber and left.
I was going to text her the following Wednesday to hang out that weekend, but she beat me to it.
You raise a woman's emotions by keeping yours in check.
Ok,
sooo..........whatever happened between you two
AFTER you and all her friends went out? I agree that a man needs to keep his emotions in check. All I'm saying is being direct doesn't mean your emotions are OUT of check.