Like many U.S. metros, Dallas-Fort Worth has weak social circles due to the large number of transplants in the area. Transplanted adults tend to have weaker social circles, making them more reliant upon swipe apps. If a transplanted adult does not want to rely on swipe apps, they make the big effort to break the cycle and become solid cold approachers. Transplants typically don't get into the best social circles in an area.
Good point here. I forget many people are moving to DFW. It's not what it once was, that's for sure.
I've noticed this in Sydney where most people are the children of migrants, there is no sense of community at all.
Prior to his religious conversion, Roosh wrote this article, which would apply to what
@Georgepithyou observes in Sydney.
As I inch closer to forty, I look across the dating landscape and notice that many other men are in the same boat as me. Either they did not have a lifestyle that was conducive to marriage or they rejected the institution outright. While these bachelors may have personality traits which prevent them
www.rooshv.com
3 signs are...
1. Atomized (Limited social network of other males)
2. Rootless (Frequent relocations, far from birthplace)
3. Immigrant parents
The people with immigrant parents have all 3 signs and
@Georgepithyou has seen these men in Sydney.
@jaymbrs made the original post about Dallas-Fort Worth. In the United States, there have been many metropolitan areas in the Southern part of the country (the Sun Belt) that have experience a lot of growth in the past 3-4 decades. Dallas-Fort Worth is a great example of that. Other examples would be Miami-Fort Lauderdale, Tampa, Houston, Austin, San Antonio, Denver, and Phoenix. These transplant heavy Sun Belt areas have a lot of atomized and rootless men in them (if they've moved there from other parts of the U.S.). The women are also atomized and rootless as well, which is meaningful.
What happens when there are atomized and rootless men & women with limited social circles? From the mid-1980s to the mid-2000s, you would have had an active nightlife scene of people trying to meet each other in bars. The cultural phenomenon helped Boomer and Gen X guys like Ross Jeffries, David DeAngelo, Mystery, and Roosh influnce men of their eras. Starting the mid-2000s, once snowflake Millennials were turning 21, technology was increasing, and online dating became fully de-stigmatized (that probably happened around the mid-2000s), tech-assisted introductions started replacing night game and day game as the primary way that people without social circles met. And since more people are atomized and rootless, there were fewer social circle possibilities. The unforeseen consequence is that once women put themselves out on social media and dating websites/apps, they would generate more interest than they could imagine. Right now, a typical 30 year old average looking woman generates more interest from men than a 22 year old supermodel in 1986. Also, add to that a surplus of single men to single women in most major U.S. metros, and you have a recipe for a bad environment.