There's no scientific evidence backing this theory. So, it isn't wise in suggesting this. While, in theory it is possible, it's depends on the dude and his chemical make-up. To date, there has been no peer reviews by the AMA doctors nor by the NIH. So, it's not considered a safe form of birth control for dudes.TRT is by far the most effective birth control for a man save for snipping. 99.8% effective.
Just because a woman listens to you and acts interested in what you say doesn't mean she really is. She might just be acting polite, while silently wishing that the date would hurry up and end, or that you would go away... and never come back.
Quote taken from The SoSuave Guide to Women and Dating, which you can read for FREE.
The probability that you are ok is one minus the probability that they both fail simultaneously.*I should know this, but how do you calculate the % effectiveness when combining two preventative methods?
I know not reccomend and I'm taking a risk but I use withdraw (76%) plus chick I see is on birth control (91%).
Thanks.
They are not, but okay, whatever you say.Condoms are for all intents and purposes 100% effective. Failure is user error (improper use, not using every time, or breaking due to insufficient lubrication).
This link only confirms my comment. Condom failure is user error. Feel free to provide some scientific evidence of sperm cells breaching the latex membrane.They are not, but okay, whatever you say.
Safety First: 14 Common Condom Use Errors
A new review of condom use error research finds that people often fail to follow directions with this birth control method.www.livescience.com
Well I'm here to tell you there is such a magic wand. Something that will make you almost completely irresistible to any woman you "point it" at. Something guaranteed to fill your life with love, romance, and excitement.
Quote taken from The SoSuave Guide to Women and Dating, which you can read for FREE.
Thanks brother. That formula actually has wide application.The probability that you are ok is one minus the probability that they both fail simultaneously.*
1 - (1- 0.76)(1 - 0.91) = 1 - (0.24)(0.09)
= 0.978 = 97.8 %
*I don’t have to worry about bc. I’m a mathcel lol.
I mean abstinence is 100% safe. It is the only 100% safe one, like it or notIf you want to avoid having kids just be a nice guy, 0% changes of pregnancy if you dont get laid.
Yes, of course it's user error, but still considered a failure rate. Pulling out and condoms are very close in terms of a failure rate; as long as the dude urinates after ejaculating. he also has to time things well. However, getting prego IS the failure. Thus, user error is the failure rateThis link only confirms my comment. Condom failure is user error. Feel free to provide some scientific evidence of sperm cells breaching the latex membrane.
Yes, that was my point. Condoms are all but 100% effective when used correctly. The error would be manufacture defect, which I believe once Trojan estimated at a fraction of 0.1%.Yes, of course it's user error, but still considered a failure rate. Pulling out and condoms are very close in terms of a failure rate; as long as the dude urinates after ejaculating. he also has to time things well. However, getting prego IS the failure. Thus, user error is the failure rate
20 children?Yes, that was my point. Condoms are all but 100% effective when used correctly. The error would be manufacture defect, which I believe once Trojan estimated at a fraction of 0.1%.
If the failure rate actually were 2% (which is quite high), a man should expect to impregnate twice per 100 lays. If that actually were true, I should have about 20 children by now (I have none).