Unable To Use Tinder Unless I Agree With BLM Movement!

[Alvafe]

And @EyeBRollin, you're a racist.

yes he is, also get ready to be called a racist too, since he loves to call others of what he is, projection is called no?

with is kinda sad, we come here to discuss and improve, but some only want to keep they belie and force it to other people, and don't matter how you argument and point his flaws, he will ignore and keep saying the same thing over and over, can't even elaborate it in a diferent manner so express himself better, with means he is just puking what was shoved on him without thinking

 

[corrector]

BLM is also not trying to dismantle unions which protected Derek Chauvin and others whom exhibit horrible patterns of behavior.

That's interesting.

What BLM seeks to do is remove funding from an already underfunded public service and spend in areas which will likely increase costs (and taxes). By the time someone interacts with the police, it's too late. We should be seeking to reduce the amount of encounters blacks have with the law,

If there is less police then wouldn't that reduce the amount of encounters? The issue is being over-policed and under-protected.

Until BLM starts to look at patterns of behavior and actually fixing the black community, I will see it as nothing more than a political coup to take down the United States. They are a leaderless movement seeking power, nothing more...

Trump and his administration is responding to the protest very badly. He tear gassed a bunch of people who were peacefully protesting so he can do a photo-op with the Bible. What type of message is that sending? Trump also appealed to white supremacist militia to use their 2nd amendment rights to go on shooting-sprees against black people. Trump has said when there is looting then there is shooting, and has made other comments dog-whistles that were made by racist white sheriffs back when civil rights protests in the 60s were brutally suppressed, such as sicking dogs on protesters.

As I said in a previous comment, the extent and level of protest is because you have Trump in the White House. Even Republicans (i.e. Lincoln project) are putting up ads against him and openly saying they'd back Biden over him on the next election. Trump is influencing the severity of these protests and this would never have happened like that if there was another president.

 

[17 shots]

OP just wants to divide us... he probably still uses bumble everyday to find his drug abusing skanks

 

[Roober]

That's interesting.



If there is less police then wouldn't that reduce the amount of encounters? The issue is being over-policed and under-protected.



Trump and his administration is responding to the protest very badly. He tear gassed a bunch of people who were peacefully protesting so he can do a photo-op with the Bible. What type of message is that sending? Trump also appealed to white supremacist militia to use their 2nd amendment rights to go on shooting-sprees against black people. Trump has said when there is looting then there is shooting, and has made other comments dog-whistles that were made by racist white sheriffs back when civil rights protests in the 60s were brutally suppressed, such as sicking dogs on protesters.

As I said in a previous comment, the extent and level of protest is because you have Trump in the White House. Even Republicans (i.e. Lincoln project) are putting up ads against him and openly saying they'd back Biden over him on the next election. Trump is influencing the severity of these protests and this would never have happened like that if there was another president.

Police encounters are not a product of an excessively large police force, especially considering how many budgets are strapped. For example, is a lower police force going to prevent the all of the black on black homicides in the last few weeks?

Regardless though, if you have significantly less police, will the crime suddenly disappear? I highly doubt it. There is always a certain percentage of the population inclined towards crime, regardless of race.

As far as the Trump issues you broached, I am not going to dive into that because a) it's irrelevant and completely unrelated, and b) your comments suggest your breadth of knowledge on the subject is extremely narrow.

 

[EyeBRollin]

Police encounters are not a product of an excessively large police force, especially considering how many budgets are strapped. For example, is a lower police force going to prevent the all of the black on black homicides in the last few weeks?

Irrelevant. “Black on Black homicide” is a dog whistle talking point. There is no difference between black on black homicide, white on white homicide, or Asian on Asian homicide. Most killings are intra racial due to proximity / encounter rates

Regardless though, if you have significantly less police, will the crime suddenly disappear? I highly doubt it. There is always a certain percentage of the population inclined towards crime, regardless of race..

Crime is correlated to socioeconomic conditions, not police size. Crime declines with an improving economy and social equity. If a population is educated, fed, and has a job they are less inclined to commit crime.

 

[Glassguy]

Irrelevant. “Black on Black homicide” is a dog whistle talking point. There is no difference between black on black homicide, white on white homicide, or Asian on Asian homicide. Most killings are intra racial due to proximity / encounter rates

Actually you're wrong again. Look up statistics for black on black killings vs those of other races and interracial killings. It's not even close.

Where do you come up with this stuff you post?

 

[Zontyy]

Irrelevant. “Black on Black homicide” is a dog whistle talking point. There is no difference between black on black homicide, white on white homicide, or Asian on Asian homicide. Most killings are intra racial due to proximity / encounter rates

Crime is correlated to socioeconomic conditions, not police size. Crime declines with an improving economy and social equity. If a population is educated, fed, and has a job they are less inclined to commit crime.

Yes crime is correlated to socioeconomic conditions but that isn't always the causation. Their are poor all white communities across america that are at the same poverty levels as most black communities but there doesn't seem to be such a huge spike in violence/homicide cases. If you look at the black on black crime should be no where near high as it is. Asian poverty shows even lower rates then both black and white.

This is why I'm a firm believer it is a culture problem that gets endorsed by the government/media. I've already posted lots of suggestions earlier how I feel it could be addressed.

 

[Glassguy]

Expanded Homicide Data Table 3

ucr.fbi.gov

As you can clearly see, blacks are killing blacks at a staggering rate.

 

[EyeBRollin]

Actually you're wrong again. Look up statistics for black on black killings vs those of other races and interracial killings. It's not even close.

Where do you come up with this stuff you post?

No. There is no such thing as “Black on black homicide.” Just like there is no “white on white homicide“ or “Asian on Asian homicide.” There is only homicide. You’re too committed to your racism to see that.

 

[Glassguy]

No. There is no such thing as “Black on black homicide.” Just like there is no “white on white homicide“ or “Asian on Asian homicide.” There is only homicide. You’re too committed to your racism to see that.

You make zero sense. Very senseless statement.

If your theory is correct, why are BLM protestors tearing down statues and burning down cities? I will wait.

 

[EyeBRollin]

You make zero sense. Very senseless statement.

If your theory is correct, why are BLM protestors tearing down statues and burning down cities? I will wait.

I know it’s hard to stick to one topic. First it’s “riots,” then it’s statues, then its “black on black homicide” now back to statues. All his arguments have been debunked.

 

[Glassguy]

I know it’s hard to stick to one topic. First it’s “riots,” then it’s statues, then its “black on black homicide” now back to statues. All his arguments have been debunked.

No they are all the same topic. You just fail to comprehend. And you also fail to answer simple questions because your brain doesnt get it.

 

[mozarto.o]

No. There is no such thing as “Black on black homicide.” Just like there is no “white on white homicide“ or “Asian on Asian homicide.” There is only homicide. You’re too committed to your racism to see that.

You are absolutely delusional. The final product of mass brainwashing.

 

[EyeBRollin]

No they are all the same topic. You just fail to comprehend. And you also fail to answer simple questions because your brain doesnt get it.

Constant subject changing is deflection. Everything you put forward has been
debunked.

You are absolutely delusional. The final product of mass brainwashing.

Ah yes.. on que the “blacks are brainwashed” accusation.

 

[Glassguy]

You are absolutely delusional. The final product of mass brainwashing.

Yep!

 

[corrector]

His father wouldn’t be murdered by police if he was actually working and had a decent upbringing he wouldn’t be smoking weed.

You mean like Elijah Mccain.

The type of guy that wouldn't hurt a fly, was vegan, played violin to animals and had to wear a mask because of a blood condition.
Police murdered him just like George Floyd despite not resisting and saying how much he supported the police.

Here there was no protests because the police department suppressed the video, no riots, and guess what? No police officer was charged and they were still working in active duty after a murder that I think is in every way like George Floyd. This has now got attention because of George Floyd and the riots and protests.

Or how about an honor roll student that is gunned down:

Who was Jordan Edwards? Teen killed by police called a good student, athlete

The Texas teen shot and killed while leaving a house party was remembered as a good student and athlete.

www.cnn.com

Here's another decently raised Black kid.

Police murder anybody that is Black, hardworking honor roll students, to sweet souls who bring joy to other people's lives, to hardworking people like Philando Castile.

Your country is so bad that I can just pull out more examples rather than bother even arguing that this statement is absolutely absurd, vile and racist. You eventually run out of excuses or come out with more absurd ones because there is more news and senseless killings than excuses you or anyone can make up.

 

[Zontyy]

You mean like Elijah Mccain.

The type of guy that wouldn't hurt a fly, was vegan, played violin to animals and had to wear a mask because of a blood condition.
Police murdered him just like George Floyd despite not resisting and saying how much he supported the police.

Here there was no protests because the police department suppressed the video, no riots, and guess what? No police officer was charged and they were still working in active duty after a murder that I think is in every way like George Floyd. This has now got attention because of George Floyd and the riots and protests.

Or how about an honor roll student that is gunned down:

Who was Jordan Edwards? Teen killed by police called a good student, athlete

The Texas teen shot and killed while leaving a house party was remembered as a good student and athlete.

www.cnn.com

Here's another decently raised Black kid.

Police murder anybody that is Black, hardworking honor roll students, to sweet souls who bring joy to other people's lives, to hardworking people like Philando Castile.

Your country is so bad that I can just pull out more examples rather than bother even arguing that this statement is absolutely absurd, vile and racist. You eventually run out of excuses or come out with more absurd ones because there is more news and senseless killings than excuses you or anyone can make up.

It really shame when an innocent person dies, did a quick google search on Elijah Mccain and found he had a normal family life with an active father in his life. If anything this just further proves my point of how important having a father is in your life.

A quick google search on Philando though showed his dad in prison and wants some of his dead sons settlement money. Furthermore they found drugs in the car of Philando's car coupled this statement "Yanez said: "I thought, I was gonna die, and I thought if he's, if he has the, the guts and the audacity to smoke marijuana in front of the five-year-old girl and risk her lungs and risk her life by giving her secondhand smoke and the front seat passenger doing the same thing, then what, what care does he give about me?" Granted this guy didn't need to die but if he had a father figure and wasn't dealing with drugs the whole traffic stop could have gone differently.

I feel like both these examples just show me how important fathers are to society. Also examples are nice and all but trying to find examples that are statistical outliers vs the hard data is bad argument. I still don't condone BLM and violent riots that incited where people have died.

 

[corrector]

I feel like both these examples just show me how important fathers are to society. Also examples are nice and all but trying to find examples that are statistical outliers vs the hard data is bad argument. I still don't condone BLM and violent riots that incited where people have died.

It is a bad argument against what? We are talking about police brutality. You insinuated that George Floyd deserved to die because he was a criminal because he used weed and broke drug laws. Looking at your statement with Philando Castile, it confirms the position. I've heard stereotypes of Black people being criminals that use weed and if police hold the same stereotypes and it ends up in blacks getting hurt, killed, put into jail on planted evidence, or police officers who are later proven to be malicious and framing the subject get off with a slap in the wrist if they are prosecuted at all, then I don't think its a bad argument. We are all statistical outliers, are we not? No two people are the same.

Here is a statistical outlier of a black man confronting a cop for planting drugs. The cop didn't get fired or prosecuted and suffered no consequences. But would you say that's okay because the officer needed to fill his quota and after all, black men probably take drugs anyway so he's guilty of something?

Seriously.

 

[Zontyy]

It is a bad argument against what? We are talking about police brutality. You insinuated that George Floyd deserved to die because he was a criminal because he used weed and broke drug laws. Looking at your statement with Philando Castile, it confirms the position. I've heard stereotypes of Black people being criminals that use weed and if police hold the same stereotypes and it ends up in blacks getting hurt, killed, put into jail on planted evidence, or police officers who are later proven to be malicious and framing the subject get off with a slap in the wrist if they are prosecuted at all, then I don't think its a bad argument. We are all statistical outliers, are we not? No two people are the same.

It really shame when an innocent person dies, did a quick google search on Elijah Mccain and found he had a normal family life with an active father in his life. If anything this just further proves my point of how important having a father is in your life.

A quick google search on Philando though showed his dad in prison and wants some of his dead sons settlement money. Furthermore they found drugs in the car of Philando's car coupled this statement "Yanez said: "I thought, I was gonna die, and I thought if he's, if he has the, the guts and the audacity to smoke marijuana in front of the five-year-old girl and risk her lungs and risk her life by giving her secondhand smoke and the front seat passenger doing the same thing, then what, what care does he give about me?" Granted this guy didn't need to die but if he had a father figure and wasn't dealing with drugs the whole traffic stop could have gone differently.

I feel like both these examples just show me how important fathers are to society. Also examples are nice and all but trying to find examples that are statistical outliers vs the hard data is bad argument. I still don't condone BLM and violent riots that incited where people have died.

I just said he didn't need to die, look at the bold above. I however did point out a correlation how drugs is related to both their deaths. George Floyd even more so considering he had OD levels in his blood stream.

This relates to police brutality and BLM rioting/violence. Police brutality does happen it however isn't as widespread as the media is making it out to be statistics/facts show that. As far as police officers planting evidence that is a statistical outlier as well most cops don't plant evidence. There is not a mass conspiracy going on here cops aren't going to risk there jobs and livelihoods to keep the black man down. Some police precincts are majority black yet they want to keep the black man down as well? Come on man I just don't buy that assumption.

 

[17 shots]

"Systemic racism"? Yeah, I remember that. It was called "S L A V E R Y," and it ended TWO centuries ago!

Yea and Michael Donald was lynched by the kkk in 1981. That was 29 years ago