MSM has been spinning that narrative for 3.5 years now:
Will these people even be pursued? with video evidence?They should just arrest and charge the remaining officers involved for first degree murder (and other charges), and the offending officer's charge should be upgraded to first degree murder and no bias or corruption on the part of the D.A.'s office and there would be no incident in the future. They should just apply the same standard as they would if it was a black cop that accidentally killed a white person.
Louisiana officer gets 40 years in prison in killing of 6-year-old with autism
Body-camera video shows the boy’s father had his hands raised in his vehicle while Derrick Stafford and a second officer fired 18 shots after a two-mile chasewww.theguardian.com
There is basically no defense for this type of thing. Even China looks at the USA as a big joke for attacking them for Hong Kong.
It is stuff like the above article and the double standards and the message that Blacks are always assumed guilty and deserve getting the death-penalty for the most minor/trivial of infractions and you got a president, white supremacists, police unions, D.A.'s office and people in the power that believe that. It's further inflamed by people that lack empathy and make up excuses rather than deal with the ugly double standards. There is no peaceful resolution if they can't arrest the remaining cops. Why is it they always quick to arrest black people and assume they are guilty and make up excuses not to arrest or go after to the fullest extent of the law when it's a white cop involved with murder caught on camera?
www.bitchute.com
You don't give in to terrorism. The worst thing he could do would be step down, that would just embolden the far left idiots that have taken over the democratic party and this country would go straight into the dumpster if they get power. The democrats are spineless at this point in history and they're dangerous if given power
Nah, they were practicing a religion that was outdated for the times, even the late 1700s most Americans weren't Puritanical trying to impose their WORDS onto other people's lives. Africans sold their slaves (already slaves in Africa) to New Jersey/New Yorkers mainly, who in turn sold them to Southerners. Slavery was not just a WHITE thing or crime or unique to WHITES. So you got these New Englanders who'd sold the slaves to Southerners, then just a few years later say Slavery should be illegal or not exist. Um, this deception is rife with their kind, and today, their swindling goes on and on and on and on. It's their mentality and their wayward ways. They're plain Evil. It was Southerners who explored and settled the west and into Texas, the frontiersmen. New Englanders just decayed in their stillness, all they ever did was Preach how others should live and try to force it. They're do-gooders, and they are the ones controlling all this chaos as they sit still rotting. The borderers from Scotland/Ireland settled the West past the Mississippi. New Englanders still sit and ruin everything they propose as "right" and the countless laws they dream up. It's a sickness. This altruism that never stops.
It's mainly intellectuals who should NEVER be given the reigns of power. Intellectuals should be relegated to painting, sculpting, drawing, etc artistic work. This man worked with his hands and read countless books. Most "intellectuals" have never worked a Day in their lives and shouldn't be allowed to rule.
Not to mention, intellectuals are always the first ones to get a bullet when the revolution they've so compassionately called for takes place
That much is true, intellectuals are always in the cross-hairs when dictatorships take over. Though I doubt they had much influence in that particular outcome.
meh I wouldn't even call artists as intelectuals, too many are too dumb to even survive doing they "art" they normally cry for goverment endorsements, with in the end remove the money from real intelectuals who are doing science
Have you read history like Eric Hoffer? He went blind for 7 years after his momma fell down the stairs carrying him but regained his sight at 11 or 12 years old and from then on he read voraciously because he was worried that he would never be able to read again if he should lose his sight again. He read Everything, even in the German language.
Read a good piece on the notion that when police brutality is being protested, police take it personally and essentially act as a counter-protest rather than being a force to protect life and property and attempt to de-escalate the situation. Rather they do more than their share to escalate. Plenty of video footage to support that. Also, thankfully, plenty of footage covering officers showing solidarity with protestors (the peaceful ones anyway).
People that have shown greed or propensity for violence shouldn't be in that job because they will get worse.
There's like a good ole boy network in law enforcement. Police don't want to turn in their co-workers. Police are basically domestic military, and I'm sure there's a fox-hole mentality, they want to support their brothers. That's understandable to an extent, but as we have seen, there are bad cops, and there are bad protesters. Apparently there are plenty of scummy people to go around, on both sides.
Power corrupts, and absolute power corrupts absolutely. I wish we could fill all the police jobs with Mr. Rodgers, but unfortunately I don't think there are enough like him to go around. He was a sniper in the military, you know (kidding, just kidding).
I saw Zen Diaries, Shandling was a surprisingly interesting person. Anyway:
yeah because of the media, NO ONE wants to be a cop so, in order to get candidates for the job the HR of those departments has to scrape the dregs, hire women even, to fill those positions - it's a sh!tty job due to "rules of engagement" either overt or covert, much like Vietnam and all wars post WWII
Good point. The protesters want more pressure put on the cops to perform correctly (as they should). But it probably results in fewer good candidates who want to take the job, so they end up hiring more bad cops. It's like a lose lose situation.
Agreed that the violence has to stop, but it's unclear at this point what will make that happen. And we can't directly compare this to race riots of the 60's, because with the internet information travels instantaneously and the ability for the destructive agents to organize and stay ahead of the curve is all but unprecedented. The destructive elements can probably keep this going indefinitely.
