I was a liberal until I hit my mid-40's. Always voted Democrat, went to their protest marches, and read the magazines.
Liberalism is good for the weaker members of society. It puts the power of government behind them, making sure they get a fair share.
The problem for men, and especially high intelligence men, is that they are stronger, both mentally and physically. Since there is a limited amount of wealth at any given time, liberalism is a policy of redistribution from the strong to the weak. The "strong" being a subset of men who by their talents and endowments are the major net contributors to society.
In a liberal society women dont need to make an allegiance to the best man available in order to maximize her life because she always has the option of government handouts. This is a major hit for men on the lower side of the SMV curve, which is most of us.
So the economic policies are anti-Male in the sense that his financial power is taken from him in order to support an agenda which will decrease the options he desires ( e.g. quantity and quality of women available to him).
But what about the non-economic sides of liberalism - chiefly the notion that we should accept every one as they are without objections? What about gun control?
I've come to the conclusion that men are generally best served by figuring out what the liberals want and voting/ working against it.
Liberalism is good for the weaker members of society. It puts the power of government behind them, making sure they get a fair share.
The problem for men, and especially high intelligence men, is that they are stronger, both mentally and physically. Since there is a limited amount of wealth at any given time, liberalism is a policy of redistribution from the strong to the weak. The "strong" being a subset of men who by their talents and endowments are the major net contributors to society.
In a liberal society women dont need to make an allegiance to the best man available in order to maximize her life because she always has the option of government handouts. This is a major hit for men on the lower side of the SMV curve, which is most of us.
So the economic policies are anti-Male in the sense that his financial power is taken from him in order to support an agenda which will decrease the options he desires ( e.g. quantity and quality of women available to him).
But what about the non-economic sides of liberalism - chiefly the notion that we should accept every one as they are without objections? What about gun control?
I've come to the conclusion that men are generally best served by figuring out what the liberals want and voting/ working against it.