Her Going Feminine

[Spaz]

Yes sleep deep my friend. Then you can come back with logic, and no feelz this time.


Yes it certainly does.

Just so you know, as with ur other feminine traits, trying to emulate a haughty vixen doesn't work well on a man.

 

[Epic Days]

The facade is gone.

 

[guru1000]

Just so you know, as with ur other feminine traits, trying to emulate a haughty vixen doesn't work well on a man.

More feelz. No logic. No subject matter. I accept your surrender for the second thread.

Can’t blame you.

The facade is gone.

Is the facade gone Ranger? Do you still need Guru’s advice via PM or are you going to follow a little guy who can’t form a logical thought in a third world country?

 

[Epic Days]

More feelz. No logic. No subject matter. I accept your surrender for the second thread.

Can’t blame you.


Is the facade gone Ranger? Do you still need Guru’s advice via PM or are you going to follow a little guy who can’t form a logical thought in a third world country?

I can be anyone you want. However, I am not RangerMIke. This is the only account I have and Atom Smasher vetted that fact. He a moderator, right?
I’ve read a lot of spaz’s posts.
I’ve never met @Spaz in my life but his mind is sound. I call it sanity. What you are doing now is not sanity.

You can judge a man by how many enemies he has. I’ve looked at those guys and their posts when they attack. You, however were a surprise.
All because he made some comments about OLD.
You could have shrugged your shoulders and forgot it.
But you didn’t. So it opened up some things. Look at this as an opportunity.

 

[guru1000]

Correct, this is the only account that you have because your Ranger account (not Ranger Mike) is deleted. Are you attesting that you are not the formerly deleted Ranger?

The man who creates philosophical thread after thread of the female imperative. The man with the same writing style and philosophical ideas of Ranger who hugs Spaz’s tail.

Not very noble of you to (try to) deceive everyone when most already know. But if that’s how you want to roll and call it sanity, have at it.

 

[Epic Days]

Correct, this is the only account that you have because your Ranger account (not Ranger Mike) is deleted. Are you attesting that you are not the formerly deleted Ranger?

The man who creates philosophical thread after thread of the female imperative. The man with the same writing style and philosophical ideas of Ranger who hugs Spaz’s tail.

Not very noble of you to (try to) deceive everyone when most already know. But if that’s how you want to roll and call it sanity, have at it.

Believe whatever you want. I’m not in charge of that. At least you didn’t deny that this is about the OLD thing. Lol
Who would have known how fragile that was?

 

[Spaz]

Guru, I see that you're stopped resisting the urge to petty.

This is what happens to a man who indulges in feminine traits, you lose ur manliness.

 

[guru1000]

Believe whatever you want. I’m not in charge of that. At least you didn’t deny that this is about the OLD thing. Lol
Who would have known how fragile that was?

More misdirecting Ranger? As stated, Your girl took a beating in the egoless thread and came back for some more in this one. Feel bad for her as I did for you in your PMs.

Guru, I see that you're stopped resisting the urge to petty.

This is what happens to a man who indulges in feminine traits, you lose ur manliness.

6000 Sosuave posts in a year is petty.

Feelz, no logic, and avoidance of discourse is as feminine as it gets Spazm. Now run along lil’ one before you get emotional and banned again.

 

[Spaz]

More misdirecting Ranger. As stated, Your girl took a beating in the egoless thread and came back for some more in this one. Feel bad for her as I did for you in your PMs.

6000 Sosuave posts in a year is petty.

Feelz, no logic, and avoidance of discourse is as feminine as it gets Spazm. Now run along lil’ one before you get emotional and banned again.

Take a moment to calm down that tattered nerves my friend.

When you're hurting as u r now, you tend to gravitate to ur inner femininity and then by default engage in delusional ideas, whimsical fantasies, jealous rage, b1tchiness, etc.

Hush now my friend lest you debased urself further.

Come back when u r coherent.

 

[guru1000]

Take a moment to calm down that tattered nerves my friend.

When you're hurting as u r now, you tend to gravitate to ur inner femininity and then by default engage in delusional ideas, whimsical fantasies, jealous rage, b1tchiness, etc.

Hush now my friend lest you debased urself further.

Come back when u r coherent.

Hush lil’ baby. The damage is done

 

[Jager]

Correct, this is the only account that you have because your Ranger account (not Ranger Mike) is deleted. Are you attesting that you are not the formerly deleted Ranger?

The man who creates philosophical thread after thread of the female imperative. The man with the same writing style and philosophical ideas of Ranger who hugs Spaz’s tail.

Not very noble of you to (try to) deceive everyone when most already know. But if that’s how you want to roll and call it sanity, have at it.

Wait, weren’t you posting about being egoless?

You were talking about words earlier, so here’s the definition of ego:

The “I” or self of any person. Identity.

There’s also this one:

Self-esteem or self-image.

And, of course:

Self-importance.

In the first two definitions, your being egoless denotes a lack of identity or self, a bleak outlook on yourself on some level. If your referring to the the third definition, your attacks, as emotional and angry as they are, show self-importance, which is contrary to your prior statements. You’d rather roast these guys than even consider in the slightest that you’re wrong. Being right is more important to you than a discussion. And when you can’t be right, faced with contention, you’ve reverted to overt attacks and anger for the sake of it.

In either case the diagnosis is the same. Simply put, you’re lying. Your posts in this thread are actually the most honest representation of yourself than you’ve presented in the past.

 

[guru1000]

Wait, weren’t you posting about being egoless?

You were talking about words earlier, so here’s the definition of ego:

The “I” or self of any person. Identity.

There’s also this one:

Self-esteem or self-image.

And, of course:

Self-importance.

In the first two definitions, your being egoless denotes a lack of identity or self, a bleak outlook on yourself on some level. If your referring to the the third definition, your attacks, as emotional and angry as they are, show self-importance, which is contrary to your prior statements. You’d rather roast these guys than even consider in the slightest that you’re wrong. Being right is more important to you than a discussion. And when you can’t be right, faced with contention, you’ve reverted to overt attacks and anger for the sake of it.

In either case the diagnosis is the same. Simply put, you’re lying. Your posts in this thread are actually the most honest representation of yourself than you’ve presented in the past.

Neither conflicts as you dont know whether I am Operating with ego today or egoless tomorrow. States change. We are dynamic in consciousness. Further, if we were to assume that I was operating in egoless and responded “to defend myself,” how can you prove that the response was not for the greater good of the forum (to discredit nonsense) and not to serve myself solely? In your analysis of these questions you shall see the light. And if you can’t see the light and remain objective, I will be more than happy to elaborate further.

As to my being wrong in this thread, I welcome you to show me exactly how I was wrong in my analysis as your friends could not. I’m waiting and I will even allow them to help you. 3 vs 1, surely this should be a lay up for you guys.

 

[Epic Days]

I’m waiting and I will even allow them to help you. 3 vs 1, surely this should be a lay up for you guys.

That’s not my game. I have no interest and you should ease off. Get some sleep.

 

[Jager]

Neither conflicts as you dont know whether I am Operating with ego today or egoless tomorrow. States change. We are dynamic in consciousness. Further, if we were to assume that I was operating in egoless and responded to defend myself, how can you prove that the response was not for the greater good of the forum (to discredit nonsense) and not to serve myself solely? In your analysis of these questions you shall see the light. And if you can’t see the light and remain objective, I will be more than happy to elaborate further.

As to my being wrong in this thread, I welcome you to show me exactly how I was wrong in my analysis as your friends could not. I’m waiting and I will even allow them to help you. 3 vs 1, surely this should be a lay up for you guys.

No need. I’ve already made my assessment of your character and nature as a person. It really doesn’t matter to me if you agree or not.

 

[Spaz]

Jagoff my assessment of your character is based off your unwitting incel-tell posts and choice of a big hairy pvssy picture which sums you up perfectly

Naughty Ninja aka Deadbeat, Guru1000's alter-ego, when one falters the other appears to take over.

Man, you have some serious mental issues.

 

[guru1000]

Spazm, I know getting hit intellectually in this thread and now emotionally by NN is creating delusions even of your own identity.

It’s going to be OK buddy. Consider this your incentive not to reach your 7000th post this year.

 

[user43770]

This thread got good quick

 

[guru1000]

We can only hope Spazm and her sisters don't tard it up any more than they already have.


I won't hold my breath.

These Expressive types try to play Dominant, but when push comes to shove, they hide behind their KBJ alliances and come out to play only on the girls’ night out when everyone is present.

And they are preaching leadership lol

 

[RickTheToad]

The only true worth of a woman to you is her ability to go feminine with you. This is an auto-response to you being masculine. As it’s an auto-response, she has no control over it. She just changes state to match yours. Masculine always attracts and/or causes a switch to feminine in the woman. We can get into value and status and all of that but it’s not going to help you understand this.

It can happen almost instantly or be a slower but constant switch. Therefore, it is critical to remove your feminine programming from your mind and its destructive conditioning by your mother, other women, teachers and our relentless societal engineering. Until you get out of the Feminine Imperative, you are fully at risk.

A woman walks around in a socially supported and created, quasi masculine state. This is all an illusion. It’s not real. Every fiber in her wants to be feminine but she has molded to the social standard. It has always been this way. The Feminine Imperative has always existed. It’s a procreation strategy developed over millions of years. She is completely solipsistic in her reality. Only a masculine man, completely free of the engineering can snap her state to feminine. Her feminine is who she really is. Not the battle ax she shows the world.

Everything else is made up to deceive the feminine indoctrinated man. At one time this was nothing more than poor genetics from the viewpoint of the genome. Thus, that man was excluded from procreation. But now, it is engineered by social structure.

That feminist, communistic and socialistic degenerate battle ax can and will go feminine in the face of masculine. But you will have trouble if you are in the Imperative. Feminine is drawn to masculine. Thus, the man is the selector. She must change her state to feminine by being in the presence of masculine.

How you think and what you are programmed to think, is a lie. This causes her to keep her legs closed to you because you are not making her go feminine. All pick-up is, is a methodology to somehow make her feminine switch turn on. Thus, it will always only be a marginal tool of use. You can be a great pick-up man and still be stressed by the social structure and women. Always striving for that next level of pick-up. When all you have to do is step out of the Feminine Imperative and realize that you were never meant to be there in the first place. Need proof? Every single one of your ancestors procreated and you are here. That’s no accident.

Esther Vilar on..."Your mother":

"She takes care that a man is trained for a particular purpose: he must work and put the fruits of his labor at her disposal. Woman has had this aim in view throughout the upbringing of her child and she engenders in him a series of conditioned reflexes which cause him to produce everything to satisfy her material needs.
She does this by manipulating him from his first year of life. Consequently, by this time his education is complete, man will judge his own value by woman's estimation of his usefulness. He will be happy only when he has won her praise and produced something of value to her."

A female should always be in their feminine. It's a dudes actions (or miss actions) which causes them to enter their masculine frame.

 

[Spaz]

This reminds me of the movie Unbreakable, where James Mcavoy character had 20 odd distinct personalities.

But those personalities actively hated each other or lived in fear of one.

However when a particular passive personality is under tremendous stress a more dominant personality takes over to save the host, even when it hated the passive personality.

Poor fella was terrorised by an over bearing mother as a child to split his personality as a coping mechanism.

James Mcavoy character in that movie had 1 female personality within him, can't recall her name though but it was an interesting movie.