Do you think the decriminalization of sex work would make women in general have a better attitude?

[MatureDJ]

I was reading about NY considering decriminalization, and it got me thinking:

https://www.huffpost.com/entry/new-...-decriminalization_n_5c7444cae4b03a10c2309c4d

Of course, even if it became legal, men should be careful:

“It feels surreal to be talking about this,” she said. “As a transgender woman who did sex work, I have experienced oppression and prejudice from the police, immigration authorities and even social service organizations because I was trading sex.”

 

[Ranger]

Make them pay taxes. Lol

 

[Serenity]

No, I know it would not. Here in Europe it's legal in most countries, it doesn't affect women in general.

 

[sazc]

No. In fact, it would make them feel less obligated to fulfill his sexual needs and more likely to use sex as a weapon to get more in a separation/divorce when she can prove he cheated with a sex worker

 

[Ranger]

No. In fact, it would make them feel less obligated to fulfill his sexual needs and more likely to use sex as a weapon to get more in a separation/divorce when she can prove he cheated with a sex worker

Then this proves that women don’t mind sharing a man. Are you sure?
Marriage is in its way out so no worries there.

 

[sazc]

Then this proves that women don’t mind sharing a man. Are you sure?
Marriage is in its way out so no worries there.

No, this doesn't prove anything of the sort, but I can see why your simplistic style of cognitive processing landed you at this conclusion

 

[sosousage]

sex should cost 10 USD

 

[Ranger]

No, this doesn't prove anything of the sort, but I can see why your simplistic style of cognitive processing landed you at this conclusion

LMAO
Then either you are wrong or both are wrong. Observation and deductive reasoning. Math & Science can be pretty scary.

 

[MatureDJ]

No. In fact, it would make them feel less obligated to fulfill his sexual needs and more likely to use sex as a weapon to get more in a separation/divorce when she can prove he cheated with a sex worker

But wouldn't there be the converse proposition that wifey was not doing her wifely duties?

 

[sazc]

LMAO
Then either you are wrong or both are wrong. Observation and deductive reasoning. Math & Science can be pretty scary.

You just dont have those deep cognitive skills. Deductive logic and reasoning isnt your strong suit, that's readily apparent from your posts. Im not the only one who sees it.

 

[Ranger]

You just dont have those deep cognitive skills. Deductive logic and reasoning isnt your strong suit, that's readily apparent from your posts. Im not the only one who sees it.

I’m sure you and your little passive boys are pretty tight. Just think, you might be able to seal their fate and keep them in the imperative.
Now isn’t that special.

 

[sazc]

But wouldn't there be the converse proposition that wifey was not doing her wifely duties?

there would, but she would counter that he's not doing what he is supposed to do with emotionally connecting/support/etc.

I know you guys like to make this about 'sex from her' and 'wifely duties' etc. I get that sex is important ad contributes to how valuable the man fees. But, with a healthy woman, sex is an exchange for her of feeling connected to him on many levels, and that connection is maintained by both him and her. She'll never feel obligated to fulfill anything if she does feel that he is trying to fulfill her. She will resist being sexual if she doesnt feel connected, loved, vulnerable, etc. And not feeling these things leads to resentment (which is actually what stops the sex)

Pay attention to what @Amante Silvestre and @guru1000 talk about on here, they seem to really understand how to bridge the eotional-cognitive gap with women.

 

[sazc]

I’m sure you and your little passive boys are pretty tight. Just think, you might be able to seal their fate and keep them in the imperative.
Now isn’t that special.

case in point, deflect completely from the topic to throw a random insult.....lmao....THAT is typical @Ranger deep cognitive processing

 

[Ranger]

That wasn’t an insult to you. It was an insult to your gross generalization and/about passive men.
I’m almost finished here on the site as I got what I came for. Patience little one.
Four months is almost too long. I have mountains to climb.

 

[AJ84]

Making it legal won’t change the fact that women still choose who they sleep with, even hookers do that (trafficked women excIuded). I remember an article about customers complaining that back page ads stated restrictions on the types of men they would not provide service to. Then there was this YouTube clip about a sex tourist complaining that women at some brothel got to choose the men, not the other way around.

I do think it should be fully legal though, I mean it could be a decent source of gov revenue and it’s not going away anytime soon.

 

[Dr.Suave]

Never understood why it is even illegal in the first place.

 

[Alvafe]

could work to lower the desperation of some, but remember sex is always about ego and power, you pulling a woman to have sex with you will raise your ego and give you power, same for woman, the more guys who want her will raise her ego and give her power

Never understood why it is even illegal in the first place.

simple really, control, it pretty much a free working condition who they can't prove, and the money exchange is based on donation, hence why police need to make traps to get guys if not they can't prove, and serious on some notes this kind of traps should be ilegal but anyway, in some they put law to ban the pimp not the prostitute, so normally they make so fake bussiness front(massage parlor the most know), and the pimp says he didn't know the girl was having sex, in other they have a hotel with a nice bar/night show and he can't control if a girl try to sell herself there

though again, in internet there is several site and even forums who let you bypass the whole law, so I don't think having the law against it is really preventing it

 

[The Duke]

Making prostitution legal would give a sector of women more rights and govt support than they currently have. They could claim their pu$$y was too sore and collect workers comp. They could sue customers for damages and lost time due to std's. They could create a sex workers union and have more control over their customers and drive the price up. They could go on strike when they got tired of doing kinky things they didn't want to do in the first place. Pimp's would lose their jobs.

Ahh just keep in under the table like it is now.

 

[Mike32ct]

No, legalizing prosties won’t change much of anything.

1. Chads and Chadlites don’t need hookers.

2. Plenty of normies are probably grossed out by hookers when they consider how many other guys she serviced.

3. Even most incels don’t really want to pay for it. They know that paying for it can make them feel like MORE of a loser.

4. Most women will NOT be assuming/thinking that, “I better give him sex, or he will hire a professional.” Most women find the idea of men F-ing hookers as gross and will assume that any decent guy would feel the same way.

 

[Who Dares Win]

First of all depenalization is different than legalization, to own few grams of marijuana is no longer a crime yet its not legal to sell few grams of it.

Regarding the topic, I disagree with those who say that legal prostitution would have no impact on the dating market.

First of all, all the guys horny and looking for sex (not validation or companionship) would no longer hit clubs and pubs therefore changing the M : F ratio in those place, they would no longer chase women aggresively in those place giving them the illusion of being in demand as people.

Average guys unable to get decent feedbacks from women would probably appreciate the safety and easyness of getting fast and CHEAP sure sex, they would no longer obsess on chats or social media but would take the fast way.

These facts wouldnt make much difference for top %nters that easily get women while it would change dinamics between the average men and the average women.

After a certain point the average guy would drop the average girl if too much drama comes and not enough sex balances it, we would observe a recalibration in the attention vs sex negotiation between the sexes in the average group.

So that would make a difference for the average man for sure, an average woman that has nothing else than sex to offer to a guy would be forced to add something to the package, add something in terms of quality or remove some discomfort in terms of drama and demands.

Men are pragmatic creatures and at some point consider the cost-benefit ratio of things, think of the mgtow epidemic we see recently.

The real deal breaker would be social acceptance and lack of social shaming for both clients and professionals, in that case word of mouth would push even more men to consider and different behaviour.

Escorts dont provide companionship or validation but allow fast, cheap and sure sexual release especially to older men.