If you had a fat wifey, would you want her to stay fat so that she doesn't leave you?

[MatureDJ]

I was reading this, and it got me interested:

https://nypost.com/2016/01/13/mom-loses-140-pounds-then-ditches-husband-and-finds-hot-young-lover/

A 35-year-old woman who got rid of half her body weight ended up transforming her love life in the process.

Katie Williams left her husband of two years — and bagged a hot young lover — after several surgeries helped her drop 140 pounds. The London resident was nearly 300 pounds before her dramatic weight loss, which involved a boob job, gastric surgery and a tummy tuck. But the newfound attention her slim figure attracted drove her husband Phil “insane with jealousy.”

After two years of marriage — and more than 20 years together — Williams ditched her jealous husband and met a younger man one month later. Painter and decorator Jack King, 23, has given Williams a confidence boost and she says she’s never felt better about her body.

 

[Trump]

Who cares. He got 2 sons out of her.

 

[Who Dares Win]

Its all about trading, never believe that bullsh1t about "accepting" someone.

That same women that someone you "accepted" gets in shape and a better deal comes it will be a second.

 

[Serenity]

Let's shift this perspective a little. She had low self-esteem, what kind of guy dates a fat chick with low self-esteem? If you guessed a guy who himself has low self-esteem, low value and can't get any better, then you're probably correct. She did self-improvement, he probably didn't. She moved on, he remains stuck in his ways.

Flip the roles and I'd fvcking leave too, it's reasonable. I would never want a fat wife to stay fat, but I wouldn't stay with a fat slob in the first place and if I did I most certainly would want her to improve. In this case the guy is probably a lazy, insecure piece of sh!t, that's why she left once she improved herself (because only then did she believe she deserved better and I don't blame her).

Wanting a wife to stay fat and undesirable to avoid other men "stealing" her is nothing more than a sign of the mans deep insecurity, that the only thing keeping her around is her lack of options. Not because the man actually has some desirable attributes.

But many will just scream "hypergamy" as if it's a negative thing. Honestly, hypergamy makes sense, why stay with sh!t if the grass really is greener on the other side. Get good or be a loser.

 

[Bible_Belt]

I wouldn't stay with a fat slob in the first place

You would if you were adrift in the open ocean and needed a floatation device.

 

[Serenity]

You would if you were adrift in the open ocean and needed a floatation device.

Fair point, lol.

 

[Fzatf]

Who cares. He got 2 sons out of her.

Children are hardly rare or difficult to create. Having a lasting relationship is significant. Though in this case I wouldn't have wanted her when she was a whale.

 

[R.U.G.]

One, the hubby has low self-esteem as he's the one who married a blimp. Two, he went nutty she lost all the weight and thus lowered his SMV as she raised hers. Three, he's stuck with child support and alimony while this new bro gets to tap her.

I read these a lot on Daily Mail. I never understood why a man would marry, let alone date hungry hungry hippo. But hey, it's all good.

 

[R.U.G.]

Children are hardly rare or difficult to create. Having a lasting relationship is significant. Though in this case I wouldn't have wanted her when she was a whale.

Amen. Creating a lasting relationship these days is nearly non-existent. Either party, male or female, always wants to upgrade. For most women, th grass is greener on the other side if they time it correctly and the bro has assets and a good job.

 

[R.U.G.]

Yea, I have no idea how a man of any worth would date a lardo like that. He clearly had a very low self-worth. Thus, when she got her sh!t in gear, she was significantly higher than him. Although, I've heard many ppl say it's much easier to turn a fatty into a housewife than a ho into a housewife. However, one has to imagine, if she looked like she does now back then, she'd be a ho and not had given him the time of day. So, in the end, it's all about a person's, man or woman, frame and self-worth. No sh!t.

 

[Trump]

Children are hardly rare or difficult to create.

Disagree.

Meghan Markle had her hands constantly on her baby bump when she spoke in front of 500 people. When celebrities get pregnant, its all over the news. The only thing people care about these days are children, children, children. No one cares about anything else.

Having a lasting relationship is significant.

A lasting relationship is significant?

John was nice man and lived a good life. He started a company from scratch that employed 1000 people and made millions each year [audience silent]. John traveled the world and helped bring water and food to disadvantaged children in poor villages [audience silent]. John had 3 children who grew up to be very important world leaders [audience silent]. John gave thousands of dollars to different charities each month. [audience silent.] But the MOST SIGNIFICANT thing John did in his life was be in a long lasting relationship with a woman. That woman now gets his company, his money, his assets, and his properties. Is she in crowd? There she is. Stand up! [audience applause!! standing ovation!!]

 

[zekko]

Reminds me a little of BigDave's plans to whip one of those online women he was talking to into shape. She had supposedly put on a few pounds and he was going to get her into the gym and fix her up. I could see her going along with that, and then taking her improved SMV out and trading in on a better deal - or just riding the carousel.

Of course he ended up not meeting her, can't remember the reason. Maybe he spooked her.

 

[Fzatf]

Disagree.

Meghan Markle had her hands constantly on her baby bump when she spoke in front of 500 people. When celebrities get pregnant, its all over the news. The only thing people care about these days are children, children, children. No one cares about anything else.



A lasting relationship is significant?

John was nice man and lived a good life. He started a company from scratch that employed 1000 people and made millions each year [audience silent]. John traveled the world and helped bring water and food to disadvantaged children in poor villages [audience silent]. John had 3 children who grew up to be very important world leaders [audience silent]. John gave thousands of dollars to different charities each month. [audience silent.] But the MOST SIGNIFICANT thing John did in his life was be in a long lasting relationship with a woman. That woman now gets his company, his money, his assets, and his properties. Is she in crowd? There she is. Stand up! [audience applause!! standing ovation!!]

Children are important but it's no accomplishment to have one. Just explode in a woman and there ya go. By lasting relationship, I mean one that doesn't end in divorce and subsequent divorce-rape. That's why a lasting relationship is significant.