Don't be a sore loser.Yes, now you can battle the dictionary. Have fun with that.
Observe and learn.
Don't be a sore loser.Yes, now you can battle the dictionary. Have fun with that.
Correct. That was the stimulus. The government has been spending ever since 2008, yet until 2 years ago couldn’t even get inflation consistently above 2%. Why? Look at oil prices. The government wants 2-3% as it’s best for long term economic growth. They will manipulate the money supply to achieve it. Those who fear inflation dont understand economics.Got it. So around 2010, for example, deficit spending spiked, probably as a result of the crash. Consumer prices dropped. But as you said there may not be causation. Obviously if the public has less money it feels comfortable spending, prices will drop to entice them. I remember airline tickets being dirt cheap in 2009-10. Meanwhile the gov't is pumping money into the economy, I'm guessing trying to push up consumer confidence and get the wheels turning faster.
I've noticed ur propensity towards feelings.You are battling a dictionary, and now calling me names for pointing it out.
Back up from the feelz, embrace the masculine logic and you will be better for it.
You seem engrossed with feelings today.I am staying on topic.
You are now avoiding both of those topics.
1. That you are battling a dictionary regarding definitions.
2. That you are basing the Putin / Poroshenko situation on your feelz (you admitted this) instead of the facts and logic I gave you.
Women use feelings.
Men use facts.
Which one are you?
Are you still confused between the difference of devaluation and depreciation of currency Danger?
Best you use your idle time to research it.
I once knew an autistic guy who fussed over the smallest detail in a movie...The dictionary disagrees with you. But you keep avoiding that.
Just as you avoid the logic of Putin / Poroshenko and instead embrace your feelz.
Address the facts and perhaps your feelz will subside. It is what men do.
No wonder they created 2 separate words because the dictionary agrees with you lmaooooLike your fussing over devaluation and depreciation even though the dictionary agrees with me?
Reiterating what I said about spending to reach target inflation rate.Now that is a great smokebomb, I have to hand it to you. But you are excluding some key items.
Oil is in everything so it has massive impacts on prices, but not in a sustainable manner if money supply does not expand to accomodate it.
When oil spikes there’s less need for government spending. Inflation is good. people buy **** today because it is cheaper than tomorrow. The government knows this, which is why they’ll bend over backwards to prevent DEflation. Get it?When oil spikes and you need to sacrifice spending because everything goes up in price, you consume less overall. This goes for people, companies and governments.
Wrong. Study the graphs again.Government deficits and spending spike when oil prices spike simply because they have no other source for the money. When that new money flows into the economy, to stay for the long haul, ONLY THEN is the inflation permanent.
Here comes the obvious deception. Danger knows oil wasn’t society’s most precious resource in Roman times, yet makes the argument anyway.Of course, don't take my word for it. Inflation and devaluation occurred in Roman times due to money clipping (they would shave the metal content from coins).
Or maybe it was those raging oil wars in the middle east back then ;-).
This is a just a lost cause. There’s no point in repeating what myself and others have tried to convey to you regarding the USD.Here is another chart for you showing that the gold/oil ratio stay very similar over time. I wonder why it doesnt stay the same for USD and oil....hmmmmm
http://www.marketoracle.co.uk/images/2012/Dec/Free-Essay-2012-12-19-fig-1.png
View attachment 2083
The fact is it denotes separate action thereby rendering different meaning hence the difference in words.Different (separate) words can often (frequently) share the same (similar) meanings (definitions).
Funny (amusing) isn't it?
Let me know when you lose the feminine feelz and we can pickup again with the facts.
Duh...I am not changing any fact. The dictionary shows the fact.
The action is not in question (printing). It is the effect being questioned by people who do not understand supply and demand.
The effect has the same meaning as evidenced by the dictionary, which you are throwing a tantrum (feelz again) about.
Printing money causes a devaluation (or depreciation) of the currency. This is a fact, and it's equivalent existed long before oil was around.
The devaluation of currency done by China is to spur growth via cheaper exports.Great, you are differentiating on intent, which is irrelevant to the discussion. Which also the dictionary does not care about.
Printing devalues (or depreciates) the currency. Whether that was the intention or not.
I understand you are emotional over this, the feelz will subside. Grab some wine and bon bons and throw on a hallmark movie.
Is this ur attempt to cover up your obvious lies and innuendos?1. This is intent. Who cares.
2. Printing is the consequence of intent in this example, inflation and devaluation is the consequence of printing. As I keep saying and you deny.
3. Your tantrums betray you. How is the hallmark movie?
Roflmao you still don't understand it do you?What lies?
I have said all along that printing devalues (or depreciates) the value of a currency.
The socialists of the site take great issue with that. Ask Venezuela how it is working for them.
The devaluation of currency done by China is to spur growth via cheaper exports.
The printing of more money is the consequences of that action.
The only one here using his feelings to influence the way he thinks is you.
Or you're slow minded to comprehend simple economic mechanism lmaoooo
Stop lying.I already answered this. Intent does not matter.
Printing reduces the value of currency regardless of whether you want to differentiate by intent (devaluation or depreciation).
But socialists of the world such as yourself think this does not cause the currency to drop in value.
The devaluation of currency done by China is to spur growth via cheaper exports.
The printing of more money is the consequences of that action.
The only one here using his feelings to influence the way he thinks is you.
Or you're slow minded to comprehend simple economic mechanism lmaoooo
You should tell me which is factually incorrect with mine;Tell me what is wrong with my statement. What is factually incorrect?
The devaluation of currency done by China is to spur growth via cheaper exports.
The printing of more money is the consequences of that action.
The only one here using his feelings to influence the way he thinks is you.
Or you're slow minded to comprehend simple economic mechanism lmaoooo
More lies to spread deceit within the thread.LOL, your emotions still have a grip on you.
Yours has nothing to do with the originating argument on whether or not printing reduces the value of a currency.
It does not negate my argument at all.
The devaluation of currency done by China is to spur growth via cheaper exports.
The printing of more money is the consequences of that action.
The only one here using his feelings to influence the way he thinks is you.
Or you're slow minded to comprehend simple economic mechanism lmaoooo
If you currently have too many women chasing you, calling you, harassing you, knocking on your door at 2 o'clock in the morning... then I have the simple solution for you.
Just read my free ebook 22 Rules for Massive Success With Women and do the opposite of what I recommend.
This will quickly drive all women away from you.
And you will be able to relax and to live your life in peace and quiet.
Stop lying and stop trying to insult the intelligence of people reading the thread.And how does it dispute my claim that printing reduces the value of money?
The devaluation of currency done by China is to spur growth via cheaper exports.
The printing of more money is the consequences of that action.
The only one here using his feelings to influence the way he thinks is you.
Or you're slow minded to comprehend simple economic mechanism lmaoooo
Cant answer yes or no and now parading more lies to cover your deceit..Yeah, that's what I thought. This does not dispute my statement at all. You just skip the final statement that the actual printing is what brings the intent of devaluation to reality in a permanent fashion.
Enjoy your hallmark movie, I'm going upstairs to fvk my girl.
The devaluation of currency done by China is to spur growth via cheaper exports.
The printing of more money is the consequences of that action.
The only one here using his feelings to influence the way he thinks is you.
Or you're slow minded to comprehend simple economic mechanism lmaoooo
Modifying my post and then projecting it as mine shows your deceitful nature.It is misleading and you know it. I have made some slight adjustments to enure it is true and CLEAR, as shown below.
The devaluation of currency done by China is to spur growth via cheaper exports.
The printing of more money is the consequences of that action.
The only one here using his feelings to influence the way he thinks is you.
Or you're slow minded to comprehend simple economic mechanism lmaoooo
Stop being deceitful and then trying to lie your way out of it.I told everyone I modified it and highlighted what I modified. No deceit from me at all, but thanks for exposing yourself to everyone.
Yours was missing key information which could mislead less knowledgeable people.
Do you disagree with the clarified version?
The devaluation of currency done by China is to spur growth via cheaper exports.
The printing of more money is the consequences of that action.
The only one here using his feelings to influence the way he thinks is you.
Or you're slow minded to comprehend simple economic mechanism lmaoooo
More misdirections to hide the fact that you're lying, and trying to deceive readers here with your deceitful propaganda/innuendos.Stop being emotional and go paint your nails to calm down
I gave a concise answer and the correction needed.
Look at the new version with my corrections and you will see what was missing.
The devaluation of currency done by China is to spur growth via cheaper exports.
The printing of more money is the consequences of that action.
The only one here using his feelings to influence the way he thinks is you.
Or you're slow minded to comprehend simple economic mechanism lmaoooo
If you currently have too many women chasing you, calling you, harassing you, knocking on your door at 2 o'clock in the morning... then I have the simple solution for you.
Just read my free ebook 22 Rules for Massive Success With Women and do the opposite of what I recommend.
This will quickly drive all women away from you.
And you will be able to relax and to live your life in peace and quiet.