Every Married Woman Is Looking to Cheat

[LaughyDuck]

Not surprising.

Those women settled for less then what they think they deserved, that's the root cause.

Marry one after dating/qualifying her for at least 4 years.

True the reason they " settle for less" is exactly the reason why they married the guy . They can control him and have Power over him by cheating on him an he forgiving her lol.
Those kind of women have no chance to start a relationship with a high SMV guy.
Like you said what they THINK they deserve.

 

[mrgoodstuff]

True the reason they " settle for less" is exactly the reason why they married the guy . They can control him and have Power over him by cheating on him an he forgiving her lol.
Those kind of women have no chance to start a relationship with a high SMV guy.
Like you said what they THINK they deserve.

High SMV has to give an ho the treatment and respect of a ho.

 

[meldiamond]

I’ve done a lot of thinking on this. I’ve listened to Tommasi’s first two books four times now within three months on audible.

Personally I don’t think they can help it. Not in a sense that men can think in a linear fashion. It’s ineffective to apply linear thought to a woman’s biological imperatives.
It’s like asking a fish to be a rabbit. I don’t think a woman’s marries a man realizing he’s going to cave. Her nature and the powerful drives of her Hypergamy prompts her to reduce him to cuck to ensure he stays in place. He sold himself out without really understanding what was happening due to his social programming since birth. This as Tomassi pointed out...what do women want? Unrestricted Hypergamy with men remaining clueless about it. So clear to me now.

With restraints removed by political forces just to monopolize the women’s vote has set open Hypergamy loose upon the western world. The feminine agenda is the single most destructive force on the planet today. Make no mistake about it.

Hypergamy doesn’t care what you think, sacrifice or complain about of whimper about. It will destroy your soul and everything else you could ever be. IF you go into a relationship without taking the red pill and fully an completely understand the peril you face, you’re dead meat. The destruction of lives caused by unrestrained Hypergamy is almost too much to calculate and still remain sane when you have calculated it.

Are women being evil? That’s almost a stupid question. When a tiger rips the guts out of its prey and starts eating it before it’s dead, do you hate the tiger? No. Nature is brutal and without mercy. A woman who dumps you feels absolutely NOTHING!
While you wallow in pain and sh!t. That’s what the blue pill and unrestrained Hypergamy produces.

The married men who supposedly have “sl@ts” are actually prompting it due to submission to his social programming and the set skills his wife uses to reduce him. He may very well be a strong powerful man who fell prey to something he knows nothing about.

I’m a fully trained marine and SF operator. No man would EVER speak to me in a way a woman thinks she’s entitled to speak to a husband. If a man talked to me like some of the things I’ve heard come out of hyperamous women’s mouths, full of pure resentment, I would cave his head in and feel nothing. That being said...WE allowed it to happen at a social level. Anger won’t help. Don’t resent it.

Learn to love women again. Give them the things they truly need. Really good sex. Make them earn everything they will ever get. Like Brent Smith use to say...when it comes to women, no good deed ever goes unpunished. Don’t ever forget that. Give them nothing for free. Don’t buy them drinks or feed them. Your only purpose in the biological world is to breed her. That’s what she wants.

I know that’s a hell of a thing to say. It brutal and unrefined. But that part of me has died. I can love them again. Do not kill the messenger. Sometimes he kills better.

You've got it totally backwards. Instead of giving up on marriage, monogamy needs to be more strictly enforced. Yes, it's "animal" instinct and of course every woman wants the best possible partner to produce the strongest offspring. However, what's good for one individual woman can have disastrous consequences for her community and by extension the entire society.

This is why male control has historically been absolutely critical for the maintenance of society through monogamy. Monogamy in turn, was supported by christianity.

In non christian societies, harems were the norm. Also kinship marriage, including first cousins, was also the norm. As you can see, first cousin marriages are disastrous, leading to extremely high rates of birth defects as well as very low IQ's. You can see the effects of this in regions like the middle east which are technologically backwards, violent and chaotic.

Women are physically appealing but they are not especially intelligent. When it comes to political matters in particular, they are maniacally driven to placate and please everyone, hence open borders. Not to mention, they are constantly driven by instinct to test men for their strength, especially for their ability and willingness to put women in their place.

Now that women cry "rape" and "harassment" and "discrimination" any time they are upset by a man's behavior, putting and keeping a woman in her natural place as a mother, caretaker and homemaker is effectively impossible.

It's like allowing crack dealers to take over every city block and rationalizing it away as: 'people just want to make money as quickly as possible so we have to love their desire to succeed.' Horsesh*t.

You are just giving up on your duty as a man when you say "love women as they are." I say love yourself as YOU are, which is a man who checks hoes.

 

[Ranger]

You've got it totally backwards. Instead of giving up on marriage, monogamy needs to be more strictly enforced. Yes, it's "animal" instinct and of course every woman wants the best possible partner to produce the strongest offspring. However, what's good for one individual woman can have disastrous consequences for her community and by extension the entire society.

This is why male control has historically been absolutely critical for the maintenance of society through monogamy. Monogamy in turn, was supported by christianity.

In non christian societies, harems were the norm. Also kinship marriage, including first cousins, was also the norm. As you can see, first cousin marriages are disastrous, leading to extremely high rates of birth defects as well as very low IQ's. You can see the effects of this in regions like the middle east which are technologically backwards, violent and chaotic.

Women are physically appealing but they are not especially intelligent. When it comes to political matters in particular, they are maniacally driven to placate and please everyone, hence open borders. Not to mention, they are constantly driven by instinct to test men for their strength, especially for their ability and willingness to put women in their place.

Now that women cry "rape" and "harassment" and "discrimination" any time they are upset by a man's behavior, putting and keeping a woman in her natural place as a mother, caretaker and homemaker is effectively impossible.

It's like allowing crack dealers to take over every city block and rationalizing it away as: 'people just want to make money as quickly as possible so we have to love their desire to succeed.' Horsesh*t.

You are just giving up on your duty as a man when you say "love women as they are." I say love yourself as YOU are, which is a man who checks hoes.

Actually I agree with virtually everything you wrote. Except one thing. Giving up. This is completely untrue.
True I am pragmatic about it. But not pendantic nor is there pontification.

From the moment we started creating civilizations the structure has been upset. Without the family structure, civilization wouldn’t even exist. This is a truth.
Every civilization before this one disintegrated.
With that being said, I do believe that women do need to be controlled. Not because they are hypergamous but because their biology lends itself to destroying men’s efforts. Civilization. Not because it’s evil but because it takes them away from their genetic imperative. This I agree again with you...they want a man to unf@ck their stupid mental sh!t. I believe if their environment was far more dangerous, they would straighten right out.
Turn her out and let a saber tooth tiger shred her.
I do not say this with malice at all. I LOVE women.
But Sun Tzu proved that it was highly effective.

So let’s just eliminate all that I wrote above. Drop it. Let’s go from women’s sufferage and the right to vote until. What is your outlined plan to reverse a highly engrained and internalized social and Marxist construct.
From schools all the way up to some rediculous psychotic feminist would need to be reconstruct. The balance is way past the fulcrum and almost on the ground for Marxist dehumanizing of society using feminism on the west and genocide one the rest.

I believe it is a problem of mental health at the deepest core. Progated by destructive programming that actually goes against the nature of a being.
Post your desertation and outline for reconstruction.

 

[Ranger]

You've got it totally backwards. .

I would like to say right now meldamond. For the short time that I’ve been here, the most misunderstood idea is a word that SPAZ used with me. It stuck in me and I can’t get it out. When that happens I know I’m onto a key to my own life and existence.
SPAZ frequently use the word “dismissive”.
The most important word in the venaculiar of this whole site.
“Women need to be dismissed.”
Your whole body communicating. Dismissive. That says so many things. Just dismissively reject them. Especially in the political arena. Just roll your eyes. No words needed.

The most powerful frame there is when dealing with women. Their panties will drip. I’m certain of it and YOU fit the final piece for me. I appriciate your post.
It was the way you said some things about women wanting to be put in their place and enforce structure onto them. Nice.
The fact that it arouses a woman is all the needed proof that that’s exactly what this world needs.
DISMISSIVE OF WOMEN. F@cking gold.

 

[meldiamond]

Here's an example of being dismissive. A bunch of old hags wearing men's clothing and their soyboy sycophants are holding a stupid meeting about how badly women are treated worldwide. Donald Trump is invited. He shows up, but he shows up late at his leisure. This shows the cross dressing female politicians that they are low priority and it also disrupts and annoys them lol:

 

[meldiamond]

You've got it totally backwards. Instead of giving up on marriage, monogamy needs to be more strictly enforced. Yes, it's "animal" instinct and of course every woman wants the best possible partner to produce the strongest offspring. However, what's good for one individual woman can have disastrous consequences for her community and by extension the entire society.

This is why male control has historically been absolutely critical for the maintenance of society through monogamy. Monogamy in turn, was supported by christianity.

In non christian societies, harems were the norm. Also kinship marriage, including first cousins, was also the norm. As you can see, first cousin marriages are disastrous, leading to extremely high rates of birth defects as well as very low IQ's. You can see the effects of this in regions like the middle east which are technologically backwards, violent and chaotic.

Women are physically appealing but they are not especially intelligent. When it comes to political matters in particular, they are maniacally driven to placate and please everyone, hence open borders. Not to mention, they are constantly driven by instinct to test men for their strength, especially for their ability and willingness to put women in their place.

Now that women cry "rape" and "harassment" and "discrimination" any time they are upset by a man's behavior, putting and keeping a woman in her natural place as a mother, caretaker and homemaker is effectively impossible.

It's like allowing crack dealers to take over every city block and rationalizing it away as: 'people just want to make money as quickly as possible so we have to love their desire to succeed.' Horsesh*t.

You are just giving up on your duty as a man when you say "love women as they are." I say love yourself as YOU are, which is a man who checks hoes.

Probably western societies are too far gone to be saved. Most of the european countries are being overrun with muslims and blacks. Large swarths of the US have become occupied by Mexico.

That's not to mention the inroads the muslims, feminists, and homosexuals have made in every sector.

In the future, Europe goes muslim and black, and the US is overrun by mexicans and overtaken by feminists and homosexuals. This leaves China and Russia as the world's superpowers in the future.

 

[mrgoodstuff]

Probably western societies are too far gone to be saved. Most of the european countries are being overrun with muslims and blacks. Large swarths of the US have become occupied by Mexico.

That's not to mention the inroads the muslims, feminists, and homosexuals have made in every sector.

In the future, Europe goes muslim and black, and the US is overrun by mexicans and overtaken by feminists and homosexuals. This leaves China and Russia as the world's superpowers in the future.

Well Islam won't put up with women cheating.

 

[meldiamond]

I started the second thread for clarification but I will add it here. Every woman who fits certain parameters will be looking to cheat. Meaning every woman who is young, hot, and newly wed.

Obviously, the fourth parameter is that she sees or finds a man who is of significantly higher status and/or value than her husband.

However, the culture is such that a woman no longer feels any sense of shame for showing her desire for a man outside of her marriage. This means that ANY married woman, especially attractive married women, has the total freedom to pursue a relationship outside of her marriage.

I am not exaggerating when I say that EVERY SINGLE TIME I have been to a social event or a seminar or conference WITHOUT EXCEPTION in the past year or so with a married woman or even a woman in a supposedly committed relationship, with or without her husband present, has made it possible to have sex with her, at least by taking the initial steps. Many of these married have disrespected their husbands to their face or behind their back, or even their own parents or in laws who are also present.

This is no joke and the process is accelerating. Of course you will be skeptical if you are never approached or rarely approached. As I said, the fourth parameter is that you have be a high status male in a high percentile of attractiveness.

 

[mrgoodstuff]

I started the second thread for clarification but I will add it here. Every woman who fits certain parameters will be looking to cheat. Meaning every woman who is young, hot, and newly wed.

Obviously, the fourth parameter is that she sees or finds a man who is of significantly higher status and/or value than her husband.

However, the culture is such that a woman no longer feels any sense of shame for showing her desire for a man outside of her marriage. This means that ANY married woman, especially attractive married women, has the total freedom to pursue a relationship outside of her marriage.

I am not exaggerating when I say that EVERY SINGLE TIME I have been to a social event or a seminar or conference WITHOUT EXCEPTION in the past year or so with a married woman or even a woman in a supposedly committed relationship, with or without her husband present, has made it possible to have sex with her, at least by taking the initial steps. Many of these married have disrespected their husbands to their face or behind their back, or even their own parents or in laws who are also present.

This is no joke and the process is accelerating. Of course you will be skeptical if you are never approached or rarely approached. As I said, the fourth parameter is that you have be a high status male in a high percentile of attractiveness.

So in your mind this is the new social norm. Women do whatever the eff they want, married or not, even around in laws. It doesn't matter your SMV as a male. So marriage == cucked?

 

[Ranger]

I think jumping to a binary ones and zeros, both ends of the extreme, doesn’t nullify his experiences mrgoodstuff.
I have noticed that attractive married women are very open about their sexuality and POSSIBLE availability. The right man comes along and yes indeed. If she can safely pull it off.

 

[DEEZEDBRAH]

The most aggressive proposition I had last year was of course married women. Its disgusting.

 

[DEEZEDBRAH]

Now we live in a culture that not only ignores the hypergamous nature of women, we reward it. Truth is that unless a chick thinks you are the very best she can do, she will be tempted to fvck around. Hooking up with a chick in a relationship is freaking easy as hell. And if I was willing to put up with the sh!t storm of drama that is created from that I would put very little effort into getting laid. I always have about three married women in my circle of friends and business acquaintances that give me green lights, but if you ignore them... they eventually drift off and assume you are not interest.

Cucking is normalized in Hollywood, TV, movies, etc. Its encouraged.

Open hypergamy is celebrated. Combined with the state and daddy government, its a power play.

Hypergamy was kept at bay before because if a woman offered no value, got fat, was a ****, had low sex drive, men would just find younger. Hell, women hit cheated on even when they offered value. Today, women are valueless commodity simply based on the sex appeal they pedal (semi nudes, attention *****, IG ASS pics, etc).

 

[mrgoodstuff]

Dudes... Don't blame MAN. Yes MAN is at fault for harboring these hoez! But man didn't make them this way. The entire system is crumbling.

So I had this friend, he put his wife into a nice house, nothing wrong with guy. Has her in a nice car too. Had a nice party treated all the guests great. So my brothers wife is friends with the guys wife. My brothers wife needs a ride over there to pick something up.

Anyway guys wife comes over and greets me and her. She keeps bending over in my walking path, like a three point stance to try to make me walk into her booty. She did this 3 or 4 times, until I made it super obvious that I wasn't encouraging it. She looked trashy as fvck doing that especially to me!

Anyway I don't put hoez on a pedestal over their husbands. Anyways due to feminism and our society, women are running wild and disrespecting and mistreating their husbands as part of their overall POWER GRAB.

So anyways I get out of that incident without nothing bad happening. Except I didn't encourage or try to sleep with the wife. So 6 weeks later, I heard from my brother that old boy beat her from head to toe.

Supposedly with one of the guys she was cheating with she tried to throw it up in his face, and said something "this is the reason why I cheat on you", and I heard he went into a blind rage and beat her till she stopped moving.

Women are doing it to men all over the country. They might have everything they need and more. And a great guy who women would love to fvck. They are cheating on them because thru marriage the guys put their neck thru the hole on the guillotine. Nothing they can do to stop her except leave.

Anyway that's my take on it.

I have another similar story of the male model built former special forces army guy, that by his determination, grit and mindpower built himself into a $300k a year salesman. The same thing happened to him. Except my modest brother was the guy his wife was cheating with. Nothing special to write home about, but my brother having been in the Army knows the bullshyt to say to a cheating wife. The do it just to tear a man up, they might not be missing anything at all. The hottest body, the biggest dyck, money, social connect won't stop these wh0res bent on damage and destruction.

 

[meldiamond]

So, it goes beyond just cheating. Women are actually looking to destroy the men they married.

As written in the Bible, it was Eve who tempted Adam and had both thrown out of the Garden of Eden. The original sin, as they say...

 

[mrgoodstuff]

So, it goes beyond just cheating. Women are actually looking to destroy the men they married.

As written in the Bible, it was Eve who tempted Adam and had both thrown out of the Garden of Eden. The original sin, as they say...

They married or who they with.

 

[DEEZEDBRAH]

So, it goes beyond just cheating. Women are actually looking to destroy the men they married.

As written in the Bible, it was Eve who tempted Adam and had both thrown out of the Garden of Eden. The original sin, as they say...

+1

So many people are retards these days.

I brought up Peterson and his biblical series and some phaghot freaked the **** out. Probably low testosterone and he seats when he urinates.

The book is ancient but it pertains to infinite wisdom.

"There eyes were opened" after eating of the fruit. So, imagine there is a fruit, a substance, let's say DMT, and you can take said "fruit," take a specific action, and "your eyes are opened. As in, who you were before and who you are afterwards are not the same thing. Its these types of actions and or non action we must take.


I don't see the original sin as simply eating of forbidden fruit. The Bible is cyclical. A consistent theme being, " walking with God." The biggest sin made was man turning his back on God, following a woman's lead, and being led astray. Its divinity and falling from grace in every instance a man chooses to follow women rather then walking with God.

If someone doesn't believe in God, take walking with God, and having one's eyes "opened" by giving of one's gifts. Living at your edge. Going balls to the wall and out on your shield. The failure is "opening your eyes" and viewing the world through the lens of the feminine imperative. Pandering to women rather then answering your calling.


The trick being to shift ones consciousness, walking that tight rope between chaos,and order.


Note, the holy Trinity is symbolic for God, as in the father, son, and spirit. Marriage is the unity of man and woman (initially). Its then evolved to being church, state,government, and big business. Its origins being one with God or the unity of two being one, and thus the closest one can come to being one with God. Its devolved into cuckoldry and is valueless commodity along with the wall ridden collapse of feminine SMV. Its fallback once they hit the wall.

The next step of a man's evolution is adaptation to the cesspool dating market and collapse of society.

 

[mrgoodstuff]

+1

So many people are retards these days.

I brought up Peterson and his biblical series and some phaghot freaked the **** out. Probably low testosterone and he seats when he urinates.

The book is ancient but it pertains to infinite wisdom.

"There eyes were opened" after eating of the fruit. So, imagine there is a fruit, a substance, let's say DMT, and you can take said "fruit," take a specific action, and "your eyes are opened. As in, who you were before and who you are afterwards are not the same thing. Its these types of actions and or non action we must take.


I don't see the original sin as simply eating of forbidden fruit. The Bible is cyclical. A consistent theme being, " walking with God." The biggest sin made was man turning his back on God, following a woman's lead, and being led astray. Its divinity and falling from grace in every instance a man chooses to follow women rather then walking with God.

If someone doesn't believe in God, take walking with God, and having one's eyes "opened" by giving of one's gifts. Living at your edge. Going balls to the wall and out on your shield. The failure is "opening your eyes" and viewing the world through the lens of the feminine imperative. Pandering to women rather then answering your calling.


The trick being to shift ones consciousness, walking that tight rope between chaos,and order.


Note, the holy Trinity is symbolic for God, as in the father, son, and spirit. Marriage is the unity of man and woman (initially). Its then evolved to being church, state,government, and big business. Its origins being one with God or the unity of two being one, and thus the closest one can come to being one with God. Its devolved into cuckoldry and is valueless commodity along with the wall ridden collapse of feminine SMV. Its fallback once they hit the wall.

The next step of a man's evolution is adaptation to the cesspool dating market and collapse of society.

Man... That's deep and real.

 

[mrgoodstuff]

Man... That's deep and real.

Man basically effed up everything by allowing woman to lead him. When god explicitly told him no.