Reasons its SMARTER to get married before 25.

[R.U.G.]

I think that IF you are determined to get married and have children, maybe it's better to get it out of the way early. That way, if you end up divorced and paying child support (which you probably will), at least you can get that paid off by the time you're in your 40s. And hopefully at that point you are still young enough to make up for whatever financial disaster you have found yourself in.

Besides, from what I understand, having children is exhausting, and the younger you are, the more energy you have.

Why risk it?

 

[zekko]

Why risk it?

I wouldn't. But some guys really want children and a family, so they might think it's worth a roll of the dice. I empathize with guys wanting to be the patriarch of their own family, I think it's a worthy goal for some. It's a shame that modern culture has nearly wiped out the ability to realize that dream.

Mind you, I know many men who have successfully created their own families without getting divorced. But it really is a risky venture, you're literally gambling your life on it.

 

[Who Dares Win]

Its smarter to marry in your late 20s with a girl in her early 20s if you live in eastern europe and you both mate in your prime, where your commitment is ready so is hers.

To marry mid 20s in a western country is pure madness nowadays given the cultural obstacles to a happy marriage, social media, peer groups/you go guuurl and most of all the legal system.

In that case you will basically burn your best years for fun and building your foundation only to find yourself mid 30s divorced with alimony to pay...so you are older and poorer while trying to restard.

I dont believe there are right choices or wrong choices, I believe the moment and the environment may turn a great idea into a failure and the other way around.

 

[mrgoodstuff]

There's a girl I flirt with that used to "joke" with me about giving her money...eventually find out she's on Phrendly and just saw me as a mark for cash always lol. Extremely nauseating and sad to see that mindset.

OMFG. How did you figure she saw you as a mark for cash? Just cause she was on "phrendly"? Can you change that frame?

 

[mrgoodstuff]

No she invited me on there and started leading me on lol. I had no clue what it was.

Can you reframe that scenario?

 

[mrgoodstuff]

No, I think she just sees men as cash in general and me in particular

Much respect to you

 

[Trump]

Besides, from what I understand, having children is exhausting, and the younger you are, the more energy you have.

You could always hire a young nanny. Then sleep with her and tell your wife “she meant nothing to me.”

 

[zekko]

This looks like as good a place as any to post this. Saw it on a wrestling site:

Hulk Hogan's ex-wife, Linda Bollea, claims Hogan is hiding assets from companies he's currently involved in and is demanding he pay 40% of his earnings or be held in contempt of court, according to Daily Mail.

The couple divorced in 2007 due to allegations of multiple affairs on Hulk Hogan's part. In the divorce, Linda was due 70% of their liquid assets along with proprieties worth $3 million back in 2009. Along with that she was due an ongoing 40% from any of Hogan's businesses.

According to Linda, Hogan has money coming in from seven different companies and claimed he, "began a scheme and shell game to conceal and tie up the parties' assets and income." With this new legal filing she's looking for what she's owed from July 2013 and on. If he doesn't comply, she's looking for her ex-husband to be held in contempt of court for not following their original divorce agreement.

I can't believe what a crappy divorce deal Hogan got, he must have had the world's worst lawyer.
70% of their liquid assets + properties + 40% of his future business earnings? That's insane. Bear in mind at the time they divorced Hogan had already had hip replacement surgery, back problems, and was basically washed up as a wrestler.

I'm providing the link in order to give credit, but I wouldn't recommend clicking on it. Wrestling sites are notorious for having a lot of pop ups:
http://www.wrestlinginc.com/wi/news/2018/0630/642325/hulk-hogan-ex-wife-claims-he-hiding-assets/

 

[zekko]

if you are 53 and not married no kids, no one is going to go out of there way to invite you anywhere.

WELL! Guess I might as well just go lay on my grave and wait to die then.

 

[IKO69]

It depends. I think that would be okay if you land a very attractive woman who is supportive and makes a good wife. Most guys kinda take what they can get tho lol

 

[mrgoodstuff]

It depends. I think that would be okay if you land a very attractive woman who is supportive and makes a good wife. Most guys kinda take what they can get tho lol

Very attractive, very supportive and wife usually don't go together.

 

[IKO69]

Very attractive, very supportive and wife usually don't go together.

Lol no they do but these are also usually the ones that get snatched up quickly. You gotta get in there quick.

 

[R.U.G.]

I wouldn't. But some guys really want children and a family, so they might think it's worth a roll of the dice. I empathize with guys wanting to be the patriarch of their own family, I think it's a worthy goal for some. It's a shame that modern culture has nearly wiped out the ability to realize that dream.

Mind you, I know many men who have successfully created their own families without getting divorced. But it really is a risky venture, you're literally gambling your life on it.

It's not worth it. If you or anyone wants kids that bad and actually wants to give them a somewhat stable life, you can always go the surrogate route then find a woman to latch on, just not marry. Therefore, you take away the ability to get raped by divorce and child support. You retain 100% control of the child's well being, and when it's up, you kick the woman out (if need by). Or, it's really best for you to have one and she to have another.

I know many married bros, some dumb rich, others do not have a pot to piss in. Neither are happy. The divorce will kill them emotionally and financially, and they know it (chances are their wive's do too). Not worth it unless a person likes to play Russian Roulette.

 

[R.U.G.]

Very attractive, very supportive and wife usually don't go together.

True. Men do not learn that until it's too late. Most women play the game.. Heck, I've heard women admit that they sometimes lose their "game face" in their relationship. It's all a game to them... Decide on how you would like to play I guess is the correct answer.

 

[R.U.G.]

This looks like as good a place as any to post this. Saw it on a wrestling site:


I can't believe what a crappy divorce deal Hogan got, he must have had the world's worst lawyer.
70% of their liquid assets + properties + 40% of his future business earnings? That's insane. Bear in mind at the time they divorced Hogan had already had hip replacement surgery, back problems, and was basically washed up as a wrestler.

I'm providing the link in order to give credit, but I wouldn't recommend clicking on it. Wrestling sites are notorious for having a lot of pop ups:
http://www.wrestlinginc.com/wi/news/2018/0630/642325/hulk-hogan-ex-wife-claims-he-hiding-assets/

Wow. What a greedy b!tch. Another reason why NO ONE should EVER get married.

 

[mrgoodstuff]

The women with the physical assets and tools almost will always play the game . The ones without it won't focus on apoearance and grow into strong providers.

 

[DEEZEDBRAH]

According to the author, you should get MARRIED in your early 20s and get your wife PREGNANT as soon as possible.

https://thoughtcatalog.com/laurence...asons-its-smarter-to-get-married-in-your-20s/

What do you guys think? He is right or does Sosuave know better?

Monogamy is notvreap life. Its a fute narrative pedaled to keep society orderly.

Marriage meant a woman was property initially. In 2018, marriage means a man is a woman's property along with Hus children (assuming they are his lol), His current and future earnings as well as assets and lastly, sexual access or more times then not,his lack thereof.


If a woman is single, the science and data shows she is skiing down cawk mountain, has cratered her SMV and best year's, and said lifestyle choice is a detriment virtually guaranteeing divorce (if a man was aw stupid enough to marry a slut). High probability of divorce. There's a lack of data shows of men since male disposability is prevalent in society.

From a top form SMV perspective of femininity, obviously acquiring earlier not later is genius given the shorter show of life.

I don't believe in marriages nor monogamy. Neither do I placate to the feminine biological strategy before or after SMV craters. Sex is just that and women aren't waiting. Neither am I. Life beacons.

New girls are turning 18 everyday.

 

[DEEZEDBRAH]

Get married for kids

Yes. Throw away future/current earnings and sexual access to women nearing bulking season.

Those stats are make belief. It suits a narrative coinciding with girl power.

Divorce isn't down. Marriage is. Retards are waking up.

Kurt Cobain put a sawed off shot gun to his head and painted the Walls with his insides just thinking about it.

 

[zekko]

It's not worth it. If you or anyone wants kids that bad and actually wants to give them a somewhat stable life, you can always go the surrogate route then find a woman to latch on, just not marry. Therefore, you take away the ability to get raped by divorce and child support. You retain 100% control of the child's well being, and when it's up, you kick the woman out

I don't have kids, don't want any, and at my age I certainly hope I don't get any. But I can understand why a guy would want some.
But I don't know many guys who would want to raise a kid on their own. When I said some guys would like to have a family, that would include the wife. A single man raising kids is no better than a single woman raising kids. For the child's sake, I really think the traditional family is the best way to raise them. Unfortunately, the traditional family is becoming extinct.

I know many married bros, some dumb rich, others do not have a pot to piss in. Neither are happy.[/QUOTE]
I know guys who are happily married. They may not be in the majority, but they're there.

Marriage meant a woman was property initially. In 2018, marriage means a man is a woman's property

I hate to say it, but for marriage to work correctly, maybe the woman would almost have to be property. However, if a man is going to be a leader, he should be a good leader. I see no indication here or elsewhere that men would treat women well or fairly under such a "property" arrangement.

 

[mrgoodstuff]

I don't have kids, don't want any, and at my age I certainly hope I don't get any. But I can understand why a guy would want some.
But I don't know many guys who would want to raise a kid on their own. When I said some guys would like to have a family, that would include the wife. A single man raising kids is no better than a single woman raising kids. For the child's sake, I really think the traditional family is the best way to raise them. Unfortunately, the traditional family is becoming extinct.

I know many married bros, some dumb rich, others do not have a pot to piss in. Neither are happy.

I know guys who are happily married. They may not be in the majority, but they're there.


I hate to say it, but for marriage to work correctly, maybe the woman would almost have to be property. However, if a man is going to be a leader, he should be a good leader. I see no indication here or elsewhere that men would treat women well or fairly under such a "property" arrangement.[/QUOTE]


But can man treat her too "well"? If he does she gets comfort and security from him and will use others for variety.