If you come across a Susie-homemaker, LTR/marriage type of woman, you're not going to get far trying to regulate her to just a FWB.
If you come across a promiscuous, FWB type, you're not going to get much trying to turn her into Susie-Homemaker (you can't turn a wh0re into a housewife, as thy say).
You are not going to find or enforce something in a woman that is not fundamentally there.
This is why I have decided to let women lead with their intent on what it is they are looking for, because it tells me exactly what kind of woman they are.
I am not dropping my standards with my approach, because I don't hold wh0res to housewife standards.
I am not giving up on what I want, because I never do anything that I don't want to do. A pvssy-whipped, "yes dear" mentality is one that derives from a man is doing something he doesn't really want.
I am not giving up control, I am simply allowing women to define themselves and their desires so that I know how to best approach the situation. Because of this, I never find myself in a situation where I'm striving for a LTR with a secret wh0re. I never find myself trying to push for a ONS or a fvck buddy arrangement with Susie-Homemaker. Every situation I get into with a woman is because I am interested in whatever desire that woman is expressing, whatever that desire might be. It has a much greater tendency of being something mutually desired.
If what a woman wants is not what I want, I don't enter into such arrangements. It's very simple. My approach has nothing to do with folding, rolling over, giving up on what I want, etc..
Are either of you guys remaining celibate and saving yourself until you find that high quality woman you're looking for? Or are you having ONS and spinning plates along the path of your search? If you are, would you consider that rolling over and giving up on what you really want? Would you consider this behavior as "being in limbo forever"?