To the women on here

[shesabranchswinger]

Why do you feel the urge to come to a mans forum what do you get out of it if anything?

Also when you hit the wall and your single with no kids, or friends of your hit the wall, why does it take so long to realize it and what does that feel like can you explain?

 

[Milano]

to the women on here: fuk u all

yours sincerely,

sexually frustrated date screw up nofap 21 day blue balls dude

 

[bigneil]

It's fine having women here who admit they are women.

However, there are clearly women posing as men here (most with multiple accounts) in order to create the illusion that men want feminism, liberalism and socialism. I've always suspected that Jaylan, EyeBRollin, Listen to Olly and Trainwreck are the same woman. If they are not, they could probably prove it by all being logged in at once.

In any event, they all hate the concept of older men and younger women with a passion, and push the "from what I can see among my immediate peers here in my friend's smelly basement" angle. They also try to hijack threads by replying over and over and getting off topic, and trying to appeal to emotion, things only women do.

I plan to develop software that will look through postings and detect via the words people use who is who.

 

[sazc]

I've always though that it was a bit paranoid and over invested to sit around and think "that user has multiple accounts" or that user is a woman disguised as a man". What's the fear? That someone's is reinforcing their (in your opinion) sh1tty viewpoint using multiple accounts? If you dont like the words/advice, ignore it, no matter how many times it's being liked or reinforced. Some things arent going to work for you as a person so ignore them. Is there a fear that you are going to take the advice of a female posting as a man and go wrong? Have some faith in yourself that you know what behavior 'works' for you and what doesnt and ignore the 'advice' that seems off. Just my opinion. Rather than be worried about it.

So what basis are you going to use to determine that the words people use identify them as female or male? Not only does it have to be peer reviewed to be remotely close to worthy but you do realize that this basis is only going to identify if someone is feminine or masculine in vocabulary. It isn't going to identify if they are masculine buy homosexual and it isnt going to be able to say "this person has ovaries". Not to mention - exactly where do you get so much free time in between your high paying job and your multiple plates that you can sit down and churn this out?

Happy Hump Day!

 

[Charmaine]

I come here only when I am bored. This forum is entertaining.

 

[bigneil]

I've always though that it was a bit paranoid and over invested to sit around and think "that user has multiple accounts"

Take it from a woman. In any case, it violates SS policy and for a good reason.

One person infiltrating a forum with multiple accounts is often the lone voice for an often anti-male opinion, but they reply to themselves and declare the idea a 50/50 wash.

This process has seen feminists infiltrate every last corner of the Earth, down to every last male locker room, the boy scouts, cub scouts, Marines, Army, Navy, Air Force - and they are usually there to lower standards and then declare equality of the sexes, often on tax payer dime. White males are the main victims.

So imagine five men agree on something and another five are about to agree, but now it appears that five men disagree, when in reality it is one woman who disagrees, for her own personal gain (and make no mistake, many of these are paid agents).

So instead of the stats saying "10 out of 10 men agree", and "1 out of 1 women disagree", she disguises as 5 men, confuses half the men who haven't formed an opinion by making it appear to be controversial so they don't vote, and we end up with "5 out of 10 men agree". Think of how this would skew gender based Venn Diagrams and data charts. This is not ok.

These individuals are not here on SS to help men. They are here to make sure men don't reach the promised land. They are spies. Spies are executed. We don't say "It's a bit paranoid to think an agent from a foreign Government infiltrated us". James Bond was not an over investment versus SPECTRE.

 

[ImTheDoubleGreatest!]

Spies are executed.

Yup, how about we just kill all those people who have made multiple accounts on here or those we suspect have? And we can also kill those we suspect to be women who haven't explicitly stated that they are. Espionage on SoSuave; didn't know it existed.....

 

[bigneil]

Yup, how about we just kill all those people who have made multiple accounts on here .

Speak of the devil.

 

[Atom Smasher]

IMO, there are only two great examples of women on here. One of them very much has her sh!t together and although I might differ on small quibbling issues here and there, I actually overall think she adds good perspectives to the community because she is in touch with her feminine core and she trusts it. The other is a very nice woman, but much more emotional and flowery, though I question whether or not it's healthy for her to be hanging out here. There is yet another who chimes in every now and then, doesn't participate much anymore, but who seems fairly together.

IMO the others do not have it together and I think overall it is unhealthy and damaging for a woman to be hanging out here (damaging to the woman, that is). What happens is that they start becoming like us, using our expressions, foul language, etc. and I think that is extremely damaging to a woman. She should be cultivating her femininity, not hanging out where our mannerisms and ways are rubbing off on her. They will then start to "correct" us and scold us for various reasons. This can have detrimental effects on the new, confused guys who come in. It slows their growth as they haven't yet learned that the last thing they should do is take advice from a woman when it comes to unplugging and/or attraction. Ditto for self-development.

Bottom line, if you're a woman, do you really think this is an environment that is beneficial for your growth? We become like who we hang out with, and you do not want to become like us. Women take their cues from their herd, not from within, and being exposed to male ways of thought and ways of expression can only erode your inner feminine core. We have that one exception here who is strong in feminine frame and is immune to becoming like us, but this ability is exceedingly rare. Who is it, you may ask? I will only hint that she usually makes "Excellent" posts.

 

[The Duke]

@LiveYourDream and @BeExcellent conduct themselves very well on here. They aren't pushing some agenda. They are here to learn, and offer their view points. They both do a good job of staying level headed. The rest of you women should work hard to be more like these two. Both are very feminine individuals. I'm quite attracted to their personalities and how caring they are. These are two that understand and appreciate a man that will lead.

 

[bigneil]

So what basis are you going to use to determine that the words people use identify them as female or male?

I'm not sure figuring out which gender they are is possible (I'm pretty sure scientists tried this and couldn't discern), but what is possible (I presume, as an inventor) is figuring out which users are the same user, based on their vocabulary usage, word groupings, misspellings, and word usage odds. I also wanted to show "Like maps" that would show which users like who, and see if it's all in one big circle for some people.

 

[The Duke]

I've always though that it was a bit paranoid and over invested to sit around and think "that user has multiple accounts" or that user is a woman disguised as a man". What's the fear? That someone's is reinforcing their (in your opinion) sh1tty viewpoint using multiple accounts? If you dont like the words/advice, ignore it, no matter how many times it's being liked or reinforced. Some things arent going to work for you as a person so ignore them. Is there a fear that you are going to take the advice of a female posting as a man and go wrong? Have some faith in yourself that you know what behavior 'works' for you and what doesnt and ignore the 'advice' that seems off. Just my opinion. Rather than be worried about it.

So what basis are you going to use to determine that the words people use identify them as female or male? Not only does it have to be peer reviewed to be remotely close to worthy but you do realize that this basis is only going to identify if someone is feminine or masculine in vocabulary. It isn't going to identify if they are masculine buy homosexual and it isnt going to be able to say "this person has ovaries". Not to mention - exactly where do you get so much free time in between your high paying job and your multiple plates that you can sit down and churn this out?

Happy Hump Day!

How about you answer the original question? Instead of acting like a whiny feminist with an irritated coochie.

 

[sazc]

How about you answer the original question? Instead of acting like a whiny feminist with an irritated coochie.

My bachelor's is in computer science, and I have a masters in management. I write code for a living. 5 days a week, 40 hours a week. THAT is the basis for my question to bigneil. I'm asking from an algorithm standpoint how he is going to clearly, assuredly, identify gender. Your personal interpretation of my written words as being an attack, or snarky, was way off base.

Lately you've been a class A prick to me. It seems that you've been doing your best to pick on me and categorize me in the manner that YOU have classified me. With all due respect, this feels a lot like projection. I realize that you've gone thru some very difficult things with females lately, so I am wondering if you're taking it out on me.

This is most definitely, as you very well know, not where we started on these boards.

I can tell you tho, you can chill. Your public assessments of me lately are incorrect. Most of all, I'm not perfect, but I'm also not here to push any agenda.

Ultimately you are going to do what you want to do. Just know, I do wish you the best.

I'm not going to engage your negativity in public. Be an a$$ if you want, I'll read it and then move on. It's not fair to any OP to hijack, and I don't need the drama.

I'm always available in PM if you want to clear the air.

 

[shesabranchswinger]

I've always though that it was a bit paranoid and over invested to sit around and think "that user has multiple accounts" or that user is a woman disguised as a man". What's the fear? That someone's is reinforcing their (in your opinion) sh1tty viewpoint using multiple accounts? If you dont like the words/advice, ignore it, no matter how many times it's being liked or reinforced. Some things arent going to work for you as a person so ignore them. Is there a fear that you are going to take the advice of a female posting as a man and go wrong? Have some faith in yourself that you know what behavior 'works' for you and what doesnt and ignore the 'advice' that seems off. Just my opinion. Rather than be worried about it.

So what basis are you going to use to determine that the words people use identify them as female or male? Not only does it have to be peer reviewed to be remotely close to worthy but you do realize that this basis is only going to identify if someone is feminine or masculine in vocabulary. It isn't going to identify if they are masculine buy homosexual and it isnt going to be able to say "this person has ovaries". Not to mention - exactly where do you get so much free time in between your high paying job and your multiple plates that you can sit down and churn this out?

Happy Hump Day!

He kinda has a point about the off topic part seeing how you didn't answer the questions and you kinda did hijack the thread to respond to him. I'm genuinely interested in an honest reply to.those questions from a woman's point of view.

 

[sazc]

I'm not sure figuring out which gender they are is possible (I'm pretty sure scientists tried this and couldn't discern), but what is possible (I presume, as an inventor) is figuring out which users are the same user, based on their vocabulary usage, word groupings, misspellings, and word usage odds. I also wanted to show "Like maps" that would show which users like who, and see if it's all in one big circle for some people.

And this is where it gets interesting. In as much as it would drive me mad to try and figure out if a poster had multiple accounts, in order to successfully have multiple accounts said poster would have to change their writing style. In order to do that successfully, (post content that stylistically unique from the other profiles) they would need to not only track each profile style, c but also legit switch personalities to a degree.

Isn't that classic schizophrenia? Or some personally defect label that I can't think of.

To me it just seems like so much work to bother engaging in. I can't imagine anyone would, but I can be naiev about things.

 

[dude99]

I'm not sure figuring out which gender they are is possible (I'm pretty sure scientists tried this and couldn't discern), but what is possible (I presume, as an inventor) is figuring out which users are the same user, based on their vocabulary usage, word groupings, misspellings, and word usage odds. I also wanted to show "Like maps" that would show which users like who, and see if it's all in one big circle for some people.

Basically identifying patterns. Like a persons finger print so to speak

 

[shesabranchswinger]

I come here only when I am bored. This forum is entertaining.

Cool so you come here for $hi!s and giggles

What about

when you or a friend hits the wall and your single with no kids, do they realize it and what does that feel like ?

 

[wifehunter]

Surprise!!!! I actually LIKE women.

Shocker, right?

(Thinks about his 5 plates)

 

[shesabranchswinger]

IMO, there are only two great examples of women on here. One of them very much has her sh!t together and although I might differ on small quibbling issues here and there, I actually overall think she adds good perspectives to the community because she is in touch with her feminine core and she trusts it. The other is a very nice woman, but much more emotional and flowery, though I question whether or not it's healthy for her to be hanging out here. There is yet another who chimes in every now and then, doesn't participate much anymore, but who seems fairly together.

IMO the others do not have it together and I think overall it is unhealthy and damaging for a woman to be hanging out here (damaging to the woman, that is). What happens is that they start becoming like us, using our expressions, foul language, etc. and I think that is extremely damaging to a woman. She should be cultivating her femininity, not hanging out where our mannerisms and ways are rubbing off on her. They will then start to "correct" us and scold us for various reasons. This can have detrimental effects on the new, confused guys who come in. It slows their growth as they haven't yet learned that the last thing they should do is take advice from a woman when it comes to unplugging and/or attraction. Ditto for self-development.

Bottom line, if you're a woman, do you really think this is an environment that is beneficial for your growth? We become like who we hang out with, and you do not want to become like us. Women take their cues from their herd, not from within, and being exposed to male ways of thought and ways of expression can only erode your inner feminine core. We have that one exception here who is strong in feminine frame and is immune to becoming like us, but this ability is exceedingly rare. Who is it, you may ask? I will only hint that she usually makes "Excellent" posts.

I agree with you for women who are into men, but I could see how this place might help females who like to strap a toy on and munch some carpet.

 

[sazc]

He kinda has a point about the off topic part seeing how you didn't answer the questions and you kinda did hijack the thread to respond to him. I'm genuinely interested in an honest reply to.those questions from a woman's point of view.

Lol, NOW I see the issue. When I clicked on the thread this morning was right after Neil posted. I read what he said and thought he was the one who started the thread, which is why I replied the way I did.

I totally missed the first two posts, lol.

In all honestly, it's getting tiring to continue to try and justify my presence on here. I get asked/called out every 3 months or so, and my reply is the same, and it's not trivial. In fact I was just asked this on PM a few weeks ago, and answered it.

As I am dating now, I get a lot out of this forum. I'd love to be able to ask questions in regards to how, as dates, you want me to interact when specific things come up, but there's always someone who decides to be an a$$ to me when I open up, and/or get a little vulnerable. So I tend not to ask.

About hitting the wall, which dez has said happens at 27, so I am assuming that it's our collective "wall" age. I didn't feel like that at 27. I was getting male attention and I had a bright future. I was happy to enjoy myself and keep dating. IMO 34 would be a better definition for the wall. Unless a female has frozen her eggs, thats more likely a panic point. To be honest (and I do have humility, and I feel very lucky) I've managed to keep my looks well. I'm hoping to continue to do this and know that my opportunities and plentiful the more I retain a lean body and good looks.

@Milano....I hear you. If I could solve all of this frustrating sh1t for every one of you, I would. Sincerely.