I saw on another message board, POF, that was really impactive. It was a subject of women wondering "Where are all the decent guys?"
Here's an excerpt, but it appears to be a reality of the situation we,as men, must accept and go along with it?
There's an emphasis on the division of labor and now it no longer really exists. Women had their roles, men had theirs and now...they only reason people will want teach other, these days, is the sex and companionship which is often times expendable once you grow weary or tired of the person in a few years.
The problem is that the overwhelming majority of people on dating sites are the "bad ones". The so-called "decent ones" are grossly out of step with reality and can't come to grips with how the world has changed. The bare fact of the matter is that there is no longer any natural basis for a relationship. A long term relationship is an impediment to the well being of average men and women. Only the continuous drum beat of the tradcons and the profit driven deception of Madison Avenue keeps the ridiculous notion of relationships alive.
In the old days, relationships developed as a cooperative division of labor based upon common goals. In the 21st century, there is no need for a division of labor; there are no common goals. This is best demonstrated by the coffee shop feminist mantra, "I don't need a man but I want a man". They don't need a man. That is absolutely true. They want a man. That is true too but it's not about their lives being better with one. They want a man only because they have been told that they want one.
Women routinely reject men that their great grandmothers would have grabbed in an instant. Great grand mother needed a man that could deliver the goods. Women, today, get the goods by other means. They don't need men. The incentive must go above and beyond "normal" to make it worth attaching themselves to an abuser. It usually doesn't.
As to men, they used to need a woman that could keep the home fires burning. Nowadays, a vacuum cleaner does a better job in 10 minutes than a woman beating the rugs for three hours. What a woman could cook in 6 hours can come from a microwave in 6 minutes. Every man that has been in the military knows how to clean, make a bed and fold clothes.
Then there is the children canard. In the days of family farms and family businesses, children were an asset. Because of the welfare state, children are still an asset to women but getting less and less so every day. To men though, especially corporate drones and manual laborers, children are a severe liability.
The average man cannot improve the life of the average single mother in any meaningful way. She passes on Joe Average. As soon as a man has secured some pvssy, a woman has nothing more to offer him. He disappears as soon as another source of easy poon makes itself available. Seeking a relationship requires the same level of gullibility as wiring money to a billionaire stranded in Nigeria. A sucker is born every minute so the relationship hustle will last a while more.
It is kind of sad though, but considering men know how to cook their own food, make their own beds, do their own dishes. The division of Labor is absent.
And i Had to nod my head vigorously at how the great grandmothers of the day would snap some of the average Joe's right up in an instant as compared to the women of today.
It often makes me wonder why people even bother marrying in the 21st century.
Do you there was something to our forefather's marriages that reinforced a love from a woman back then? Was there some kind of bond, romantic even, that stimulated the nature of marriages/relationships just in the pre-industrial or even the pre-to-post War War II era?
You didn't have to worry about flaking hardly back then that's for sure. If a woman said yes to a date, she committed herself to it 100%.
Here's an excerpt, but it appears to be a reality of the situation we,as men, must accept and go along with it?
There's an emphasis on the division of labor and now it no longer really exists. Women had their roles, men had theirs and now...they only reason people will want teach other, these days, is the sex and companionship which is often times expendable once you grow weary or tired of the person in a few years.
The problem is that the overwhelming majority of people on dating sites are the "bad ones". The so-called "decent ones" are grossly out of step with reality and can't come to grips with how the world has changed. The bare fact of the matter is that there is no longer any natural basis for a relationship. A long term relationship is an impediment to the well being of average men and women. Only the continuous drum beat of the tradcons and the profit driven deception of Madison Avenue keeps the ridiculous notion of relationships alive.
In the old days, relationships developed as a cooperative division of labor based upon common goals. In the 21st century, there is no need for a division of labor; there are no common goals. This is best demonstrated by the coffee shop feminist mantra, "I don't need a man but I want a man". They don't need a man. That is absolutely true. They want a man. That is true too but it's not about their lives being better with one. They want a man only because they have been told that they want one.
Women routinely reject men that their great grandmothers would have grabbed in an instant. Great grand mother needed a man that could deliver the goods. Women, today, get the goods by other means. They don't need men. The incentive must go above and beyond "normal" to make it worth attaching themselves to an abuser. It usually doesn't.
As to men, they used to need a woman that could keep the home fires burning. Nowadays, a vacuum cleaner does a better job in 10 minutes than a woman beating the rugs for three hours. What a woman could cook in 6 hours can come from a microwave in 6 minutes. Every man that has been in the military knows how to clean, make a bed and fold clothes.
Then there is the children canard. In the days of family farms and family businesses, children were an asset. Because of the welfare state, children are still an asset to women but getting less and less so every day. To men though, especially corporate drones and manual laborers, children are a severe liability.
The average man cannot improve the life of the average single mother in any meaningful way. She passes on Joe Average. As soon as a man has secured some pvssy, a woman has nothing more to offer him. He disappears as soon as another source of easy poon makes itself available. Seeking a relationship requires the same level of gullibility as wiring money to a billionaire stranded in Nigeria. A sucker is born every minute so the relationship hustle will last a while more.
It is kind of sad though, but considering men know how to cook their own food, make their own beds, do their own dishes. The division of Labor is absent.
And i Had to nod my head vigorously at how the great grandmothers of the day would snap some of the average Joe's right up in an instant as compared to the women of today.
It often makes me wonder why people even bother marrying in the 21st century.
Do you there was something to our forefather's marriages that reinforced a love from a woman back then? Was there some kind of bond, romantic even, that stimulated the nature of marriages/relationships just in the pre-industrial or even the pre-to-post War War II era?
You didn't have to worry about flaking hardly back then that's for sure. If a woman said yes to a date, she committed herself to it 100%.
