Bigneil's 30 Strippers

[mrgoodstuff]

As long as we're on the subject my current relationship has lasted 12 years and counting. I've also had another relationship that lasted 10 years. Obviously I've missed out on some variety during those years but I don't mind, I ran around a lot when I was in my 20s.

I have a pretty stable personality, I stay on an even keel.

Regarding money, however you deal with women, it's nice to have some cash for yourself, if no one else. At least Neil is sharing his good fortune. He's kind of the anti-Scrooge.

He's "Dad" Just joking. But to some of him he may be, or like "santa clause". It's not always bad to be "dad" or "santa", but we shouldn't reward the bad kids!

 

[Serenity]

@ImTheDoubleGreatest! You are getting unreasonably upset about the fact he has more money than most of us. Money brings some extra choices, he doesn't need to improve himself to our level because of his money. Sure he might struggle without being so generous with money, but the fact is he has the money. So yeah, you might be correct but it doesn't matter.

Who on here doesn't or haven't "bragged" about their encounters with the opposite sex?

I do feel a lack of open-mindedness towards our opinions, but you can't seriously expect much else because we (you included) aren't particularly open-minded towards his opinions either. If you had true wisdom you would have noticed your hypocricy before it went too far. Now I kindly ask you to stop attacking him and getting this thread closed, I want serious answers and a respectable discussion. We've had our go at him, he's not gonna change no matter how much sh!t you throw at him.

 

[foreverAFC]

theres nothing wrong with what neil is doing because its not like he is being duped, he just has enough money that it becomes an attribute he can use to get what he wants

personally if i had that kind of money i wouldnt bother dating the strippers though, i would just pay them them for handjobs and bl0wjobs in the private dance whenever i was horny

 

[bigneil]

Wait, you guys know I was totally broke in most of my 20's and all of my 30's, right? How do you explain my dating strippers when I was 23 and broke?

This guy is as fake as the actual value of US currency. If he really thought he could get chicks without money, he would have told all of us that a long time ago.

Not an argument. The onus is on you to disprove what I said, not for me to be held to a higher standard than anyone else. Can you prove you are 17? Can you prove you are male? Try to understand something:

A man paying for dinner does not prove he is not good looking, as much as this annoys men who can't afford dinner.

Also, my date the other night was not a stripper. The girl I took to dinner Friday, who, while grasping for straws, I'mTheDoubleGreatest said "decided I was good looking because I bought her dinner", originally waved to me from across the room and she and her 3 friends all told me I was extremely attractive. Thus, I hadn't asked her out until after she told me I was good looking. That's always the case. I only date women who are highly attracted to me physically. That's not hard for me to do. I'm 6'5", strong and I have really blue eyes. Women swoon for me long before I spend a dime. To be sure, I read body language as well.

Try again, little boy.

 

[bigneil]

Regarding money, however you deal with women, it's nice to have some cash for yourself, if no one else. At least Neil is sharing his good fortune. He's kind of the anti-Scrooge.

I'm not just generous with strippers. I tip everyone. Police, bouncers, bums on the street. I try to improve the lives of everyone whose path I cross. I've learned that the more generous I am, the more money comes into my life. Make no mistake, certain women were simply not available until my income reached a certain level. But that was not directly a result of my income. That was the fact I became a man capable of commanding a large income. Imagine: men with skills are sexy.

People whining about the emptiness of money are missing the point: I have incredible skills. I make a 15 minute phone call and someone agrees to pay me $100,000 for a 6 month contract (and I can overlap several contracts). They trust me to perform at an incredibly high level. It turns out women are turned on by men who have high skills. That took 20 years of expertise (hard work).

That is what pisses off some of these whiny boys here: they know they are going to have to work hard for 20 years to get to where I am. They can't just fart out something about how it's what's inside that matters and get lots of likes and bypass hard work.

 

[blind_one]

Inb4 50 year old manchild tells me how he could beat me up because he has no way to counter my post. Pathetic.

Way to productively respond to a thread. I suggest you just add him to ignore list instead if you do not like his content. No one is forcing you to read it.

My longest relationship lasted a year and half. Probably half a year too long. Thankfully I snapped out of it sooner rather than later.

 

[BreezyB84]

I had a stripper as a tutor in college who works for the FBI now. Does that count?

 

[ImTheDoubleGreatest!]

@ImTheDoubleGreatest! You are getting unreasonably upset about the fact he has more money than most of us. Money brings some extra choices, he doesn't need to improve himself to our level because of his money. Sure he might struggle without being so generous with money, but the fact is he has the money. So yeah, you might be correct but it doesn't matter.

Who on here doesn't or haven't "bragged" about their encounters with the opposite sex?

I do feel a lack of open-mindedness towards our opinions, but you can't seriously expect much else because we (you included) aren't particularly open-minded towards his opinions either. If you had true wisdom you would have noticed your hypocricy before it went too far. Now I kindly ask you to stop attacking him and getting this thread closed, I want serious answers and a respectable discussion. We've had our go at him, he's not gonna change no matter how much sh!t you throw at him.

Then you misinterpret my annoyance. Because most men on here whether they have the money or not decide that they DON'T want to spend a crap ton of money over a chick who might not even fall through, that equates to all of us being broke little boys who need to get a job. That's literally rephrasing PK's responses to use the terms "broke" and "boy" instead of "beta" and "faggot". Sure it can work, but it definitely isn't the only way. And if you have a preference not to spend a crap ton on a woman, it doesn't make you a cheap ass or anything. It's called not rewarding someone for nothing.

Not an argument. The onus is on you to disprove what I said, not for me to be held to a higher standard than anyone else. Can you prove you are 17? Can you prove you are male? Try to understand something:

A man paying for dinner does not prove he is not good looking, as much as this annoys men who can't afford dinner.

Also, my date the other night was not a stripper. The girl I took to dinner Friday, who, while grasping for straws, I'mTheDoubleGreatest said "decided I was good looking because I bought her dinner", originally waved to me from across the room and she and her 3 friends all told me I was extremely attractive. Thus, I hadn't asked her out until after she told me I was good looking. That's always the case. I only date women who are highly attracted to me physically. That's not hard for me to do. I'm 6'5", strong and I have really blue eyes. Women swoon for me long before I spend a dime. To be sure, I read body language as well.

Try again, little boy.

Oh but it is an argument old man. I am saying that IF YOU COULD get women without money, your ego would not let you refrain from telling all of us that. Ego is built off of the validation of external things (aka money). Self esteem is not. Confidence is not. They are built from the validation of internal things. And the fact that you respond to EVERY post that hurts your ego by falling back on the one thing you have rather than using actual sound arguments, well it just goes to show that you do have a huge ego without any self esteem. Hence why without money, you are nothing.

And look at that, again quoting things that I have never said. Go try to find that post and where I made it. It didn't happen, your mind is fabricating lies to protect your oh so fragile ego. You even thought I was Grewd because I posted that no one cares about your 30 prostitutes. Again, your mind is fabricating lies. You are a weak man, and you are living a lie. Stay in denial littleneil. It's the only thing barring you from admitting you are wrong in ANYTHING.

Way to productively respond to a thread. I suggest you just add him to ignore list instead if you do not like his content. No one is forcing you to read it.

I can learn from anomalies like him. That's why no matter how annoyed I am, I won't put anyone on ignore. You can always learn from everyone. Even little kids or people with mental disabilities sometimes.

 

[bigneil]

FACT: Only 1 in 1000 men earns as much as me. Prorated by salary, I actually spend far less than any of you on dating.

I am saying that IF YOU COULD get women without money, your ego would not let you refrain from telling all of us that.

Wait, you mean besides the 19 year old prom queen who threw herself at me in November? You haven't done your homework. I did pay $2 for the games of pool before taking her home. That would break your budget.

I've been seducing beautiful women since you were a gleam in your dad's eye.

What you think you stand to prove by stomping your feet and clenching your fists is one of the great mysteries of SS.

Anyhow, nice of ImTheDoubleLamest to roll out of bed at 2pm. No wonder "he" is so afraid of the concept of having to work.

 

[bigneil]

DISCLAIMER:

At this point I'm not alone here when I say I'd be absolutely shocked if ImTheDoubleGreatest is male. No man would ever argue with another man to this level, not with such blatant hypocrisy as other members have noted. No, this is clearly a bitter, unattractive woman I'm dealing with. Or a gay male. Men who are good with women don't call strippers prostitutes. Ugly women do.

No, this is Jaylan (aka EyeBRollin) again. Mods, please check into this.

 

[Serenity]

@ImTheDoubleGreatest! You have officially lost it, the argument and everything. Nothing you're saying at this point is holding up, it's all just crumbling into irrational goo and assumed accusations based on your own prejudice. It seems an awful lot like your ego is built off of the validation of external people, like how you desperately want me and bigneil to validate your opinion. It's not gonna fvcking happen kid. Don't complain about his arguments, yours are absolute sh!t and basically just ad hominem.

It's not wrong to not spend a sh!tton of money on women, it's not wrong to spend a sh!tton of money on women either. Bigneil can still do whatever the fvck he wants with his money. If you ask me it's better to be generous just because, than to constantly use money as a reward in behavior manipulation.

He has DECIDED that he wants to spend this amount of money regardless of "women falling through" or not. Decided against the popular choice perhaps, but he can do that and you can't do sh!t about it. He can afford to lose that money and that is in fact the exact same mindset I have. I do not need guaranteed return on the money I spent on a woman, like how an AFC expect a woman to suck his c0ck for buying her dinner. Investements don't always give positive return and it's damn near impossible to predict with accuracy, true fact about the real world right there.

I too don't really give a fvck what everyone else does or thinks, if 99.99999% of guys didn't spend sh!t on a woman I still would. Actually if that was the case I most definitely would, because that would make me the 0.00001% of guys who does that making me a super rare catch. So "most guys does this/that" isn't really a convincing argument, because the rule is "do whatever most other guys don't do".

If you prefer not spending money on women that's fine.
If you prefer spending millions on women that's fine too.
If you prefer spending something in between those extremes on women, guess what? That's fvcking fine too.

There's more ways to attract women than all the members on this forum combined could ever imagine, who the fvck are you to say a particular way is "wrong"?

@bigneil Let's just ignore this keyboard jockey, would you care to answer my questions?

 

[zekko]

I certainly believe that you can seduce women without spending any money, but just to play devil's advocate, let me ask this:

If y'all believe in Briffault's Law, what are you offering women that they can't get elsewhere? What is to their benefit that they should they spend time with you? Your smiling face?

 

[bigneil]

Indeed I would like to hear from Double what he considers his best traits that women like.

For me:

1) Eyes (First thing they notice, I'm told)
2) Height (Second thing they notice, I'm told)
3) Brain (I quickly blow them away with numbers and predictions)
4) Wardrobe (I wear a tie)
5) Generosity (I improve their life when they are with me)
6) Chivalry (I get the door for them and would die to protect them)
7) Courtship (I take them to memorable places)
8) Photography (I capture their beauty)

 

[Bible_Belt]

FACT: Only 1 in 1000 men earns as much as me.

Despite being one of the brokest people on here, believe it or not, back in the day trading glory days, I came close, at least for a short time. I bought a fast car and fast bike, went out to eat a lot, but after that, I quickly became bored of the money. It just piles up and becomes a bigger pain in the ass to manage and protect. It also quickly becomes alienating. If you don't have rich friends, too, then there is no one to go do rich person stuff with.

But the last thing I ever did was go wave money in some woman's face, thinking it would make her like me. I've blown money on strippers before, in fairly obscene amounts, but never even then thought of it as more than a drug-induced good time. I actually get laid a lot more now than I did then, because back then I worked a lot and would put a lot of my free time into work.

So not everyone espousing the money-doesn't-matter argument is, or at least was always, a financial failure in life.

 

[9Volt]

It's one thing to take a chick to a place you want to go even IF you spend a good amount of money and a whole other thing to simply take her to a place to spend a good amount of money just to "impress" her especially a stripper whos job is to take money from men just because she's a "hot" woman who gets naked in front of crowds of them.

I myself am not into "coffee dates" or trying to sit in my house with chick after chick simply to get sex as if sex itself is some form of "validation". I like going places and doing different things. If I invite a chick I pay. If after a second time out a chick doesn't even offer to show reciprocation as in offering to pay a tip or get me a drink it shows she EXPECTS to be "taken care of" while YOU invest and she takes only offering her presence. I'll gladly pass a chick like that on to the investing provider.

 

[ImTheDoubleGreatest!]

FACT: Only 1 in 1000 men earns as much as me. Prorated by salary, I actually spend far less than any of you on dating.


Wait, you mean besides the 19 year old prom queen who threw herself at me in November? You haven't done your homework. I did pay $2 for the games of pool before taking her home. That would break your budget.

I've been seducing beautiful women since you were a gleam in your dad's eye.

What you think you stand to prove by stomping your feet and clenching your fists is one of the great mysteries of SS.

Anyhow, nice of ImTheDoubleLamest to roll out of bed at 2pm. No wonder "he" is so afraid of the concept of having to work.

DISCLAIMER:

At this point I'm not alone here when I say I'd be absolutely shocked if ImTheDoubleGreatest is male. No man would ever argue with another man to this level, not with such blatant hypocrisy as other members have noted. No, this is clearly a bitter, unattractive woman I'm dealing with. Or a gay male. Men who are good with women don't call strippers prostitutes. Ugly women do.

No, this is Jaylan (aka EyeBRollin) again. Mods, please check into this.

Awww, did I hurt your feelings again? Typical. Throwing out assumptions that you yourself can't even prove when every claim I make is backed. It's truly pathetic old man. And just so you know: sex for money = prostitution hahaha

 

[ImTheDoubleGreatest!]

@ImTheDoubleGreatest! You have officially lost it, the argument and everything. Nothing you're saying at this point is holding up, it's all just crumbling into irrational goo and assumed accusations based on your own prejudice. It seems an awful lot like your ego is built off of the validation of external people, like how you desperately want me and bigneil to validate your opinion. It's not gonna fvcking happen kid. Don't complain about his arguments, yours are absolute sh!t and basically just ad hominem.

I'm not looking for any validation from you or anyone here, it should be pretty obvious at this point. you don't have the social skills to understand what I am trying to say if you think so.

There's more ways to attract women than all the members on this forum combined could ever imagine, who the fvck are you to say a particular way is "wrong"?

That's EXACTLY what I am trying to say about OP here. You obviously didn't read this post:

Because most men on here whether they have the money or not decide that they DON'T want to spend a crap ton of money over a chick who might not even fall through, that equates to all of us being broke little boys who need to get a job.

Sure it can work, but it definitely isn't the only way. And if you have a preference not to spend a crap ton on a woman, it doesn't make you a cheap ass or anything.

I'm done with this. Take it however you want. I'm not going to explain myself to you further because you have your own prejudices yourself. You live in one of the most blue-pill countries in the world don't you? I even recall you wanting to prove all of us wrong by going completely afc on a chick to see if it would work, then you stated that she ended up friendzoning you: http://www.sosuave.net/forum/threads/breaking-every-rule-on-here-d.223232/ You don't have any sound arguments either.

 

[bigneil]

The last thing I ever did was go wave money in some woman's face, thinking it would make her like me. I've blown money on strippers before, in fairly obscene amounts.

Contradiction of the day.

 

[9Volt]

Like I said before. If you are simply spending money to impress chicks into "liking" you you're doing it wrong. Because 99% of those SAME chicks if you wound up broke and in "need" wouldn't do the same because they are used to TAKING money. Not dishing it out in reciprocation.

If you prefer to go to cool places, new places etc. I agree 100%. Coffee dates and sitting in the house all day even for sex gets old and boring as fvck. there's more to life than always trying to "get over" while accomplishing little in life as in trying new things, places etc. You just need to see if a chick is WILLING to reciprocate. If she is and or does? Then she's the type who would have your back even IF you never went broke and needed her.

Same chit with friends. If you have to constantly pay for them and they never reciprocate. They aren't truly your friends but parasites and when the next best thing comes along since you were the one investing while they did nothing in return it's easy for them to move on while you got TOOK.

Nothing wrong with being generous so long as the chick is willing to reciprocate what she can and not just "sex" or "compliments".

 

[bigneil]

I'm not looking for any validation from you or anyone here, I'm done with this. Take it however you want. I'm not going to explain myself to you further because you have your own prejudices yourself. You live in one of the most blue-pill countries in the world don't you?

Translation: Double has ZERO redeeming qualities, and is simply a whiny little b!tch mad that Trump won. Go tip over a trash barrel or rob a 7/11 or something, you worthless waste of a welfare payment. Go ahead and get the last word in, but my analysis of Double is that she is nothing more than a bitter sh!t stain who can't stand witnessing how the 1% live.