Whitney Cummings spreads red pill

[CMNILS87]

Whitney Cummings new stand up on HBO spills all red pill truths that we all know about. But the depth she went into it was astonishing. She talks about the wall at 30 and how no guys want her after. She even talks about how all the attention and whoring in her 20's screwed her up. If you ever want to see what happens to desperate women in mid 30's watch it as a warning. She even hamsters about alphas and having kids, but "not right now" at like age 36. So she freezes her eggs...

 

[Poon King]

Women over 30 go for submissive betas because they start to fear abandonment around that age. They also know that only desperate betas will put up with their sh!t long after their expiration date without cheating or dumping them for someone younger and hotter.

Its a true story that a lot of women start to freak out if they are still single around age 27-30. Some women even admit it. I overheard one of my female co-workers talking about how happy she was to be "taken off the market" before she got too old. She even admitted to freaking out around age 28 when her current boyfriend refused to propose. She dumped him for it.

The longer a woman stays single beyond age 30.. the more she will have to settle. Reason being.. a woman's chances of getting a marriage proposal from a "high quality man" drops with every year she lives past 25. Once she hits 30, time accelerates even faster and the possibility of ANY proposal from ANY type of man drops.

Women over 30 are great for submissive blue pill betas. Desperate women and submissive betas make a good match. Women are opportunists at heart.

 

[Good Gao]

Whitney Cummings is my type of dream ****.

Brunette, pretty, and crazy as ****.... Man the things I would do to a woman with those kinds of looks...

 

[Arcturus]

Funny stuff. Link to full show:

 

[foreverAFC]

im surrounded by tons of attractive women at work who are that age, every single one of them is dating or married to weak, docile, super beta looking guys. i was actually shocked by it at first, i was walking around thinking these women must all be dating guys who look like pro athletes but thats not the case. ever single guy looks weak and docile and beta as fck. i see them looking at me all the time too since i spent all my free time hitting the gym and doing martial arts, they obviously arent very attracted to the men they are with.

 

[ImTheDoubleGreatest!]

It's biological, and sex is a biological craving EVERYONE has. And what turns on guys the most is submissiveness from women. Therefore, if the porn industry wants to make the most money, they need to reach the very core of our being, they cannot change that.

 

[zekko]

PUA Theory cracks me up. Not saying this isn't a tendency, but as a hard and fast rule it's ridiculous.
Women past 30 only settle for betas. So if you are dating a woman past the age of 30, she isn't really attracted to you. Lol. Wow, life's a b!tch.

 

[Poon King]

PUA Theory cracks me up. Not saying this isn't a tendency, but as a hard and fast rule it's ridiculous.
Women past 30 only settle for betas. So if you are dating a woman past the age of 30, she isn't really attracted to you. Lol. Wow, life's a b!tch.

Women over 30 settle for betas because they have no f*cking choice.

No alpha is dating a woman over 30. Sport f*ckings.. sure. Dating? No way. He has younger, hotter and better options.

 

[zekko]

Women over 30 settle for betas because they have no f*cking choice.
No alpha is dating a woman over 30. Sport f*ckings.. sure. Dating? No way. He has younger, hotter and better options.

I don't know, that is generally true, but some women over 30 are pretty hot. See the quote below, foreverAFC is taking about attractive women:

im surrounded by tons of attractive women at work who are that age, every single one of them is dating or married to weak, docile, super beta looking guys.

 

[MrWiggles]

Women over 30 settle for betas because they have no f*cking choice.

No alpha is dating a woman over 30. Sport f*ckings.. sure. Dating? No way. He has younger, hotter and better options.

what if the guy is 65? Still a beta?

 

[PantyWhisperer]

PUA Theory cracks me up. Not saying this isn't a tendency, but as a hard and fast rule it's ridiculous.
Women past 30 only settle for betas. So if you are dating a woman past the age of 30, she isn't really attracted to you. Lol. Wow, life's a b!tch.

Her current, 36 year old self may be attracted to you, but likely her 23 year old self would not have. All else being equal. Exceptions to every rule of course but if a woman gets north of 28 and is not married, and in fact no man has ever proposed to her yet, what she is "attracted to" changes dramatically. And a huge difference in just a couple of years. Like at 32 she will be miles more desperate than she was at even 30. The desperation curve becomes exponential.

 

[Poon King]

what if the guy is 65? Still a beta?

YEP.. and I'll tell you why...

The only reason an "alpha" would enter a LTR is for reproductive reasons. Any other reason would be beta. And if you are looking to reproduce.. you are looking for women in their 20's. If you are NOT looking to reproduce.. then what reason would you have to commit to a LTR unless you were a beta? Keep in mind that having only one woman (a girlfriend) is not the same thing as committing to one woman. You can have only one woman and still be willing to f*ck others. That willingness separates the alphas from the betas. The beta fears "messing up what he has" the alpha does not. Alphas don't care if a woman leaves. Only betas care. Because betas are co-dependent. Alphas never allow themselves to be on a woman's emotional leash. Age doesn't matter. Number of plates doesn't matter either.

Senior citizens have some of the highest numbers of STD's of all age groups. Old people sleep around more than you would think. Disney society tries to tell you what age is "appropriate" to do this and that. You can be old as dirt and still spinning plates.

 

[zekko]

The only reason an "alpha" would enter a LTR is for reproductive reasons. Any other reason would be beta.

OR maybe this "alpha" doesn't care what you think or care to confine himself to the narrow spectrum of behavior that you want to define for him. I don't believe in all these cookie cutter characters that this forum likes to talk about. Different men have different personalities, and different reasons for doing what they do. In other words, I don't believe that all "alphas" think alike.

If every "alpha" acted the same, thought the same, and did the same things in every situation, they would be nothing but a bunch of robots. And men are not robots.

 

[Poon King]

OR maybe this "alpha" doesn't care what you think or care to confine himself to the narrow spectrum of behavior that you want to define for him. I don't believe in all these cookie cutter characters that this forum likes to talk about. Different men have different personalities, and different reasons for doing what they do. In other words, I don't believe that all "alphas" think alike.

If every "alpha" acted the same, thought the same, and did the same things in every situation, they would be nothing but a bunch of robots. And men are not robots.

Look bro.. I just post what I personally think. You don't have to agree and I don't care what you do.

As I've told others.. you have 100% free will in life. You don't need me or anyone else to validate or approve how you live. But any man who follows "relationship rules" he doesn't agree with out of fear he might lose a woman is no alpha. Don't care what you say.

 

[PantyWhisperer]

I have to agree. I may not like that definition because maybe it means "I'm not alpha!!" which no man, especially not here, wants to concede, but it is still true. If you are doing things you don't want to do in order to keep a woman and you are past the reproductive age in life, and so is she, then you are just not alpha. At least not yet. Not in this instance.
The IDGAF frame is much much harder to hold than most men might think. I'd say only maybe 10% of men would fit that definition.

 

[zekko]

I have to agree. I may not like that definition because maybe it means "I'm not alpha!!" which no man, especially not here, wants to concede, but it is still true. If you are doing things you don't want to do in order to keep a woman and you are past the reproductive age in life, and so is she, then you are just not alpha.

You guys misunderstand me,, I'm not talking about myself. I'm just saying that everybody is different, and you can't put people in a box. Who knows what motivates a 65 year old (alpha or not)? None of us have hit that age yet.

I make no claim of being alpha (other than being a situational alpha at times). Although when it comes to relationships, I am not a supplicator, and I certainly don't do anything out of fear, and definitely not out of fear of losing a girl. I do what I want. I firmly believe in holding the frame, and I think all women are basically replaceable.

I don't really believe in labels, but if anything, I probably am closest to the "Omega male". I am very independent, don't need people around me, and I'm not interested in conforming to anyone's views, not even the more popular views on this forum. I think for myself. But I don't really fully fit that label either, because I have been able to succeed in mainstream society. I guess I am willing to do just enough to fit in while still retaining my independence.