10 SJW Myths That Will Not Die

Status
Not open for further replies.

EyeBRollin

Master Don Juan
Joined
Oct 18, 2015
Messages
10,697
Reaction score
8,644
Age
35
1. Ah moving the goalposts now? There was no socializing of losses because there was no loss. You were completely wrong.
There is. They contract it out to their public-sector competitor, because they cannot maintain a profit in doing so.

2. Overrepresented proves nothing, hiring unqualified over whites, simply because they are white, hurts whites. And it is extremely racist.
Actually, it means everything. You're trying to argue AA is institutionally racist. Where is the proof of institutional bias against whites?

3. Yes, you did
You aren't going to get any credibility by fabricating people's arguments.

4. Anytime a qualified white is dismissed for being white, it hurts whites.
AA's biggest beneficiaries are white women. How does the advancement of white women hurt whites?
 

Tictac

Banned
Joined
Jul 28, 2009
Messages
3,689
Reaction score
1,256
Location
North America, probably an airport
Correct. This is a freefall problem. Are you going to answer my question?
Each tower collapsed from the point of impact, each higher floor releasing potential energy (including the major one that you don't even know about or understand) to the floors below as it fell.

Watching videos with ominous music and narrative is not 'science' Pee Wee.
 

EyeBRollin

Master Don Juan
Joined
Oct 18, 2015
Messages
10,697
Reaction score
8,644
Age
35
Each tower collapsed from the point of impact, each higher floor releasing potential energy (including the major one that you don't even know about or understand) to the floors below as it fell..
The point of impact has nothing to do with the question. What was the external work done between equilibrium and freefall?
 

EyeBRollin

Master Don Juan
Joined
Oct 18, 2015
Messages
10,697
Reaction score
8,644
Age
35
1. There is still no loss to be socialized. No loss occurred.
You're begging the question here. There is no loss because they subcontracted their own service to their competitor.

2. AA IS institutional and racist. The mere fact AA exists is proof of racism against whites.
LOL. No AA was put in place to mitigate institutional racism against other races, actually.

3. My credibility is way beyond what you will ever achieve.
You can't construct an argument without logical fallacies.

4. Are AA's ONLY beneficiaries white women?
Who said that?




If not, then whites are harmed.
Evidence?
 

Peace and Quiet

If you currently have too many women chasing you, calling you, harassing you, knocking on your door at 2 o'clock in the morning... then I have the simple solution for you.

Just read my free ebook 22 Rules for Massive Success With Women and do the opposite of what I recommend.

This will quickly drive all women away from you.

And you will be able to relax and to live your life in peace and quiet.

Tictac

Banned
Joined
Jul 28, 2009
Messages
3,689
Reaction score
1,256
Location
North America, probably an airport
The point of impact has nothing to do with the question. What was the external work done between equilibrium and freefall?
I already explained to you that a 7,000 ton aircraft impact at 500+ mph and releasing 60,000+ pounds of JP4 was more than sufficient energy added to the potential energy already in each tower to weaken it catastrophically. The fire from that much jet fuel played a minor role but not unimportant role in further weakening the compromised structures. The people that planned these attacks selected the range of floors (upper third) that they did because they knew how to accomplish their aims

An engineer would know that a 431 foot tall building does not fall over from impact alone, especially one with a second source of potential energy that you don't even know about. Maybe a kid that plays with Tinker Toys would think that way but not an engineer.

My favorite engineering professor once called engineers 'attorneys for the laws of nature'. You are not an engineer of any kind. You like your laughable videos with creepy music and narratives.
 

EyeBRollin

Master Don Juan
Joined
Oct 18, 2015
Messages
10,697
Reaction score
8,644
Age
35
I already explained to you that a 7,000 ton aircraft impact at 500+ mph and releasing 60,000+ pounds of JP4 was more than sufficient energy added to the potential energy already in each tower to weaken it catastrophically.
Failure from the collision would disrupt equilibrium at impact. What happens when you play Jenga? What happens if you remove one leg from a chair?

The fire from that much jet fuel played a minor role but not unimportant role.
It's a ****ty explanation at best since it calls into question the material composition, effectiveness of the insulation and fire suppression systems, and how specific members need to fail for a perfect freefall instead of lopsided fall.

An engineer would know that a 431 foot tall building does not fall over from impact alone, especially one with a second source of potential energy that you don't even know about. Maybe a kid that plays with Tinker Toys would think that way but not an engineer.
Correct, it does not. So what external work was done on the buildings? It wasn't the jet impact.

My favorite engineering professor once called engineers 'attorneys for the laws of nature'. You are not an engineer of any kind. You like your laughable videos with creepy music and narratives.
Ad hominems huh?
 

EyeBRollin

Master Don Juan
Joined
Oct 18, 2015
Messages
10,697
Reaction score
8,644
Age
35
1. Great, so we agree there was no loss, therefore it was not socialized.
No, we don't agree. Shifting responsibility to the public sector is corporate socialism.

2. It does not matter WHY it was allegedly put in place, it only matters that AA is institutionally racist against whites.
Yes, it does matter.

3. Personal attacks now? Shocking.
I can't match your superior intellect.

4. I asked a question, I did not make a statement. If jobs are given to non-whites over whites, simply for being a non-white, then yes whites have been hurt by the racism of AA.
Where is your proof?

5. The law itself is the evidence. Or are you claiming no white was ever not chosen due to color?
Which law, specifically?
 

Tenacity

Banned
Joined
Jun 23, 2014
Messages
3,926
Reaction score
2,194
How do you explain that equating to having half the per-capita spending power as whites?
On a per-capita basis. My hypothesis is that black women do what they have to do to make up for so many black men being incarcerated.
- I think $1.1 Trillion - $1.8 Trillion (current estimates) of black spending power is pretty damn good considering we are 13% of the population AND considering all of these claims being made by the left and SJWs that we are still in a racist nation. What do you think the spending power should be? $2.5 trillion? If so, what's that's based on?

- There are 22 million black men in the US and about 1 million of them are locked up. How in the hell are black women having to go to college because there's quote, unquote "so many" black men locked up? That's just simply not the case.


Your question is based off a faulty premise. The median black household net worth is just $1,700, vs. $116,000 for whites.
We don't. Only 5 of the Fortune 500 CEOs are black. That's 1%, vs. blacks making up 13% of the population. Blacks are underrepresented in corporate America. Everyone knows this.

Blacks only make up 1.4% of the top 1% families, and that is for income, not wealth.
Those numbers are somewhat accurate, now, why is that? I believe that's mainly a result of a lot of the money made prior to 1970 (which was concentrated mainly in the white camps) being passed down from Generation to Generation. Basically, they are sitting on a lot of old money.

Is that fair? Is that right? Hell no.

But we in Black America have to start pooling resources together like Dr. Claud Anderson talks about with his PowerNomics stance. We can't fvcking do that, if N-words continue to be worshiped and continue to tear down every damn thing.

We need a Black Civil War, black people separate from N-words. Then once that separation is done, we as black people embrace the stances of people like Dr. Claud Anderson and build up our Black America and expand it across the globe. I want Black Googles, I want Black Apples, I want Black Dells, etc. We can't do that UNTIL we first get a Black Civil War and separate from N-words.

The solution is for black people to build up our OWN SHYT and stop looking for someone else (Jesus, a Democrat, etc.) to come in and do shyt that we need to do.


My theory was a combination of housing segregation, the war on drugs, racial biases in employment, property taxes funding education, the war on drugs destruction of unions, health care discrepancies, among other causes that make up institutionalized racism. What is your explanation for all those discrepancies?
My explanation is that the black community became the N-word community after the Civil Rights Movement. Before 1970, our families were together, we sought education, we built businesses in mass, we built Black Wallstreet, we built our OWN SHYT.

After the Civil Rights Movement, we integrated into the mainstream society and STOPPED building our own shyt. Instead, we turned to Far Left bullshyt like Feminism and Socialism, as well as embraced the Drug Game which created the "N-word culture". Everything you are listing is a socialist based mentality, of "gimme this, gimme that". We need to BUILD our own shyt.

In addition, the "war on drugs" only affects the N-word culture, black people don't sell nor use fvcking drugs so that bullshyt doesn't affect us! I really do not give a damn what happens to N-words. I don't care if the cops shoot every last one of those pieces of shyt down. They are thugs, criminals, and a waste of sperm........they do NOTHING but kill other black people, fvck up black children's lives, and set the black race BACK 200 years. Fvck them with a capital F!


Do you not agree that poverty cause crime?
No, I don't agree with it, because if that were the case there would be global anarchy as the vast majority of the global world is in poverty. There would be no peace, ever, at any time....in the world. The bullshyt in Chicago has nothing to do with poverty, it has ALL to do with N-words and the N-word culture. I'm sick....and tired.........of Ray Ray and Pookie.
 

Tenacity

Banned
Joined
Jun 23, 2014
Messages
3,926
Reaction score
2,194
Do blacks have a greater record of dine and dash/not paying bills?
Short answer...YES.

I was even dating a black waitress who always bytched about the fact that black people NEVER even tipped and sometimes they would even dip out without paying their dinner bill. When they dip out, it's the waitress that has to cover the entire tab of the order.

So if the owner wants to put a credit card on tab before serving "N-words"....I don't fvcking blame him!!
 

EyeBRollin

Master Don Juan
Joined
Oct 18, 2015
Messages
10,697
Reaction score
8,644
Age
35
- I think $1.1 Trillion - $1.8 Trillion (current estimates) of black spending power is pretty damn good considering we are 13% of the population AND considering all of these claims being made by the left and SJWs that we are still in a racist nation. What do you think the spending power should be? $2.5 trillion? If so, what's that's based on?
I'm not repeating myself to you. READ.

- There are 22 million black men in the US and about 1 million of them are locked up. How in the hell are black women having to go to college because there's quote, unquote "so many" black men locked up? That's just simply not the case.
Think about it.

Those numbers are somewhat accurate, now, why is that? I believe that's mainly a result of a lot of the money made prior to 1970 (which was concentrated mainly in the white camps) being passed down from Generation to Generation. Basically, they are sitting on a lot of old money.
That sounds real American.... :)

Is that fair? Is that right? Hell no.
And you're okay with it? Got it.

But we in Black America have to start pooling resources together like Dr. Claud Anderson talks about with his PowerNomics stance. We can't fvcking do that, if N-words continue to be worshiped and continue to tear down every damn thing.

We need a Black Civil War, black people separate from N-words. Then once that separation is done, we as black people embrace the stances of people like Dr. Claud Anderson and build up our Black America and expand it across the globe. I want Black Googles, I want Black Apples, I want Black Dells, etc. We can't do that UNTIL we first get a Black Civil War and separate from N-words.
I guarentee you no one in this country wants anything to do with the words "Civil War." You're arguing to exterminate black folks? That's called genocide, playboy.

Doesn't get any more "Uncle Tom" then that.

The solution is for black people to build up our OWN SHYT and stop looking for someone else (Jesus, a Democrat, etc.) to come in and do shyt that we need to do.
Black people will never succeed with more capitalism. Capitalism in America was founded on the backs of slaves. Learn your history.

My explanation is that the black community became the N-word community after the Civil Rights Movement. Before 1970, our families were together, we sought education, we built businesses in mass, we built Black Wallstreet, we built our OWN SHYT.

After the Civil Rights Movement, we integrated into the mainstream society and STOPPED building our own shyt. Instead, we turned to Far Left bullshyt like Feminism and Socialism, as well as embraced the Drug Game which created the "N-word culture". Everything you are listing is a socialist based mentality, of "gimme this, gimme that". We need to BUILD our own shyt.

In addition, the "war on drugs" only affects the N-word culture, black people don't sell nor use fvcking drugs so that bullshyt doesn't affect us! I really do not give a damn what happens to N-words. I don't care if the cops shoot every last one of those pieces of shyt down. They are thugs, criminals, and a waste of sperm........they do NOTHING but kill other black people, fvck up black children's lives, and set the black race BACK 200 years. Fvck them with a capital F!

If black people don't sell or use drugs why are so many in jail for it?

No, I don't agree with it, because if that were the case there would be global anarchy as the vast majority of the global world is in poverty.
And poor countries don't have nukes, which is the only thing preventing them from being bullied by the United States.

There would be no peace, ever, at any time....in the world. The bullshyt in Chicago has nothing to do with poverty, it has ALL to do with N-words and the N-word culture. I'm sick....and tired.........of Ray Ray and Pookie.
LOL, clearly. You must of had it bad with ol' girl.

Short answer...YES.

I was even dating a black waitress who always bytched about the fact that black people NEVER even tipped and sometimes they would even dip out without paying their dinner bill. When they dip out, it's the waitress that has to cover the entire tab of the order.

So if the owner wants to put a credit card on tab before serving "N-words"....I don't fvcking blame him!!
I'd tell his racist ass to go **** himself.
 
B

BlueAlpha1

Guest
I'm not repeating myself to you. READ.



Think about it.



That sounds real American.... :)



And you're okay with it? Got it.



I guarentee you no one in this country wants anything to do with the words "Civil War." You're arguing to exterminate black folks? That's called genocide, playboy.

Doesn't get any more "Uncle Tom" then that.



Black people will never succeed with more capitalism. Capitalism in America was founded on the backs of slaves. Learn your history.



If black people don't sell or use drugs why are so many in jail for it?



And poor countries don't have nukes, which is the only thing preventing them from being bullied by the United States.



LOL, clearly. You must of had it bad with ol' girl.



I'd tell his racist ass to go **** himself.
"Institutional" is a word liberals and black racists use when there are no specific examples to support certain wild claims.

"Systemic" is another word that seeks to distort the actual definition of racism by falsely implying it has something to do with power.

"Root cause" is a phrase used by virtue-signaling white liberals and tribal blacks who want to blame rampant black crime on some invisible white force rather than criminal blacks themselves.

"Nuance" is an empty buzz word meant to blur hard data and statistics by undermining them - the claim being that even though you can't see or touch these intricate variables, that they nevertheless exist and this rationalizes the aforementioned problem

"Disproportionate" is a word used by white-guilt ridden libs and black racists to claim the number of per capita blacks in trouble with the law has something to do with anything other than black crime

"Racist" is a gutter term which has been stretched out, branded to whites, and rendered utterly meaningless - thrown around by liberals and tribal blacks, usually right after they've lost an argument to the point of no return.

"White privilege" is a mythical concept that racist non-whites use to excuse away their collective and individual failures.

"Uncle Tom" is a cowardly phrase used by tribal blacks to shame strong blacks with critical thinking skills who dare deviate from the tribe.

Consider yourself disarmed and your arsenal of race baiting severely weakened.
 

Tenacity

Banned
Joined
Jun 23, 2014
Messages
3,926
Reaction score
2,194
"Institutional" is a word liberals and black racists use when there are no specific examples to support certain wild claims.

"Systemic" is another word that seeks to distort the actual definition of racism by falsely implying it has something to do with power.

"Root cause" is a phrase used by virtue-signaling white liberals and tribal blacks who want to blame rampant black crime on some invisible white force rather than criminal blacks themselves.

"Nuance" is an empty buzz word meant to blur hard data and statistics by undermining them - the claim being that even though you can't see or touch these intricate variables, that they nevertheless exist and this rationalizes the aforementioned problem

"Disproportionate" is a word used by white-guilt ridden libs and black racists to claim the number of per capita blacks in trouble with the law has something to do with anything other than black crime

"Racist" is a gutter term which has been stretched out, branded to whites, and rendered utterly meaningless - thrown around by liberals and tribal blacks, usually right after they've lost an argument to the point of no return.

"White privilege" is a mythical concept that racist non-whites use to excuse away their collective and individual failures.

"Uncle Tom" is a cowardly phrase used by tribal blacks to shame strong blacks with critical thinking skills who dare deviate from the tribe.

Consider yourself disarmed and your arsenal of race baiting severely weakened.
AMEN!

Also, check out what my boy, the Great Ben Shapiro, has to say about this White Privilege non-sense:

 
B

BlueAlpha1

Guest
AMEN!

Also, check out what my boy, the Great Ben Shapiro has to say about this White Privilege non-sense:

Shapiro is OK. I do like the fact that he's very articulate and unapologetically brash, but his style not the best method of combating these ideologies. He has annoying mannerisms and is likely to just confuse and turn off your average viewer. He is best suited for people like Marc Lamont Hill or Michael Eric Dyson, black pseudo-intellectuals who've made a career out of spouting complicated race-baiting babble at rapidfire speeds. Shapiro has a similar style and could go toe to toe with them.

On the other hand Shapiro has made videos on Youtube about Trayvon Martin for example which I thought were way over the top. He's also virilently against Trump because he's a check-pants Rockerfeller Republican. And his emphasis on facts is really rich when you consider he's an Orthodox Jew who reads the Torah religiously - not too many "facts" in there. He was also admittedly a virgin on his wedding night. LOL
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Tenacity

Banned
Joined
Jun 23, 2014
Messages
3,926
Reaction score
2,194
Shapiro is OK. I do like the fact that he's very articulate and unapologetically brash, but his style not the best method of combating these ideologies. He has annoying mannerisms and is likely to just confuse and turn off your average viewer. He is best suited for people like Marc Lamont Hill or Michael Eric Dyson, black pseudo-intellectuals who've made a career out of spouting complicated race-baiting babble at rapidfire speeds. Shapiro has a similar style and could go toe to toe with them.

On the other hand Shapiro has made videos on Youtube about Trayvon Martin for example which I thought were way over the top. He's also virilently against Trump because he's a check-pants Rockerfeller Republican. And his emphasis on facts is really rich when you consider he's an Orthodox Jew who reads the Torah religiously - not too many "facts" in there. He was also admittedly a virgin on his wedding night. LOL
I hear you, I like Shapiro because majority of the time his stances are on point, no matter how "direct" his delivery style is. And I believe you can put up Jesus Christ himself to state these same exact bullet points and the average viewer will still reject them because, the country has moved to the Center Left. That's the reality. So no matter how nice you say the stances, no matter the delivery, it will be the same result.

I've spent pages speaking with Eye B Rollin, I've listed data after data, stats after stats. The guy is going to continue to respond pushing more of his narrative.

Again, if I show that 2 + 2 = 4, he will respond saying YES, 2 + 2 = 4, but then go on spinning a narrative of how there's some type of conspiracy behind the first "2" and that means that the answer should have never been 4, it should have been 3 or something. After he gets done with that, he'll repeat his narrative and throw out more personal attacks against me by saying I'm just stating my points because I'm just mad because "thugs" take my women away. That's very similar to how other sections of the Far Left (feminists) say that a guy is just gay, or hates his mother, or has a little dyck, if he comes out and criticizes a woman's behavior.

The reality is that this country is already Center Left and it will continue to move more Left. There's no changing it. The way Eye B Rollin thinks is how 90% of black people think and it's also how a SIGNIFICANT percentage of this country thinks. And I've already broken down how most of what he's saying makes no damn sense.

So all I can say is save your money and if it gets too bad here, look to move outside of the country to some other place where they have common sense. Just like I had to leave the black community YEARS ago, it's going to come a time where common sense Americans are going to have to LEAVE America because the stupid Far Left will reign supreme going forward. Count on it.

We as common sense Americans have sat back and kept our collective mouths closed for TOO LONG, while Far Left guys like Eye B Rollin network/gather together and run off at the mouth about narratives that make literally no damn sense, are not linked to any data, the stats/data don't support the narratives......nothing. But their narrative has become our nation's GOSPEL, based solely on the loud mouths continuing to spew it.
 
Last edited:
B

BlueAlpha1

Guest
I've spent pages speaking with Eye B Rollin, I've listed data after data, stats after stats. The guy is going to continue to respond pushing more of his narrative.

Again, if I show that 2 + 2 = 4, he will respond saying YES, 2 + 2 = 4, but then go on spinning a narrative of how there's some type of conspiracy behind the first "2" and that means that the answer should have never been 4, it should have been 3 or something. After he gets done with that, he'll repeat his narrative and throw out more personal attacks against me by saying I'm just stating my points because I'm just mad because "thugs" take my women away. That's very similar to how other sections of the Far Left (feminists) say that a guy is just gay, or hates his mother, or has a little dyck, if he comes out and criticizes a woman's behavior.
Spot on. This is what the far left does, and there have been many a-former liberal who came around to see this. David Horowitz and Bernie Goldberg come to mind - two guys I didn't like as a politically educated teenager.

I was a liberal throughout high school and college, probably 25 yard line (so I leaned left on 3/4 issues.) But unfortunately the left has been hijacked by these foaming lunatics. It's not just BLM - it's radical feminists, Muslim apologists, and self-hating white cowards who have made liberalism itself look like a mental disorder. Now I consider myself conservative 40 yard line, but these people would consider me a fascist and a white supremacist.

And it's true, these are the tactics they use. When they lose the debate, they speak in vague generalities about "systems" and "institutions". It's deliberately broad double-talk and it works because it sounds sophisticated to low-information listeners and moderates, and it alludes to unsolvable problems, so the arguments never have an expiration date. They can't point to any discriminatory law, but the word "institutional" sounds smart. And those are the polite ones who will just obfuscate. The nasty ones throw out words like racist, sexist, rapist - these are words that have been utterly stripped of their meaning because the left uses them on everyone.

The reality is that this country is already Center Left and it will continue to move more Left. There's no changing it. The way Eye B Rollin thinks is how 90% of black people think and it's also how a SIGNIFICANT percentage of this country thinks. And I've already broken down how most of what he's saying makes no damn sense.

So all I can say is save your money and if it gets too bad here, look to move outside of the country to some other place where they have common sense. Just like I had to leave the black community YEARS ago, it's going to come a time where common sense Americans are going to have to LEAVE America because the stupid Far Left will reign supreme going forward. Count on it.
The white community is no different. An overwhelming portion of them have bought into the propaganda that the white race has historically been the most evil. Of course this is a lie. All people have had periods of outright barbarism. Yes, the Americans owned slaves and the Brits tried to colonize the entire planet. But does anyone want to talk about the Zulus of Africa? The suicide bombers of the middle east? The cartels in Mexico who are worse than Islamic State? The communist Asians who killed 100 million people (or North Korea at this moment?) The Klan wasn't even a speck of dust compared to some of these atrocities. Cruelty is a human flaw, not a white one.

We as common sense Americans have sat back and kept our collective mouths closed for TOO LONG, while Far Left guys like Eye B Rollin network/gather together and run off at the mouth about narratives that make literally no damn sense, are not linked to any data, the stats/data don't support the narratives......nothing. But their narrative has become our nation's GOSPEL, based solely on the loud mouths continuing to spew it.
Intellectual featherweights like him have gotten away with this nonsense for far too long. This sort of political correct discourse and the myths that come with it (institutional racism, patriarchy) now permeate our schools, politics, and corporations. Isolating oneself from it is just another harsh truth of the red pill.

P.S. If you want some great work from people far better than Shapiro, try Sam Harris (his cross to bear is Islam, not race) or Larry Elder (perhaps the bravest black man in America)
 

EyeBRollin

Master Don Juan
Joined
Oct 18, 2015
Messages
10,697
Reaction score
8,644
Age
35
"Institutional" is a word liberals and black racists use when there are no specific examples to support certain wild claims.
No it is a noun that means "of institition" - as in societal organization or establishment. It's in the dictionary.

"Systemic" is another word that seeks to distort the actual definition of racism by falsely implying it has something to do with power.
No, it's an actual word and it does require power. How can a marginalized group be racist without power?

"Root cause" is a phrase used by virtue-signaling white liberals and tribal blacks who want to blame rampant black crime on some invisible white force rather than criminal blacks themselves.
Tribal blacks? lol, that's not racist :)

Why are blacks convicted of drug crimes more often than whites? Why do they receive harsher sentences? Why are black criminals more likely to receive the death penalty?

"Nuance" is an empty buzz word meant to blur hard data and statistics by undermining them - the claim being that even though you can't see or touch these intricate variables, that they nevertheless exist and this rationalizes the aforementioned problem

"Disproportionate" is a word used by white-guilt ridden libs and black racists to claim the number of per capita blacks in trouble with the law has something to do with anything other than black crime
You're falsely applying a quantitative approach to a qualitative discussion. Blacks are convicted of crime more often than whites. So what? Are you arguing blacks are pre-disposed to committing crime?

"Racist" is a gutter term which has been stretched out, branded to whites, and rendered utterly meaningless - thrown around by liberals and tribal blacks, usually right after they've lost an argument to the point of no return.
No, like insitutional, racist is term with an actual definition. It is the belief that races can be superior or inferior to other races. There's no way to spin it.

"White privilege" is a mythical concept that racist non-whites use to excuse away their collective and individual failures.
"Mythical concept" can be applied to anything YOU don't understand.

"Uncle Tom" is a cowardly phrase used by tribal blacks to shame strong blacks with critical thinking skills who dare deviate from the tribe.
"Tribal" blacks and "strong" blacks. That's not racist :) Are there "tribal" whites and "strong" whites too?

Consider yourself disarmed and your arsenal of race baiting severely weakened.
Sounds like you're the one doing baiting with your terminology.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top