Ah yes, your superior intellect on this subject comes out perfectly clear with this supremely ignorant statement of yours:
Are you totally mentally incompetent? So you're telling a guy who needs to lose fat that "there is no set number of calories" he needs to shoot for? And now you're telling us that you know more about this topic than most people could ever dream of knowing?
Correct. If Fat Don Juan burns 1,800 calories per day, the only thing required for him to lose weight is to consume less than 1,800 calories per day over time.
He HAS been listening to his body.. that's the reason why he's carrying excessive fat right now and needs to lose weight! Nobody said he needs a spreadsheet he just needs to be more mindful of what he puts in his mouth. I gave him numbers because your suggestion "just eat better" is utterly retarded and is so simple minded it's like getting exercise advice from a ten year old girl.
It really is that simple. You're the one trying to turn it into some exclusive science. Burn more calories than you consume. If Fat Don Juan wants to lose weight, that's all he has to do. Hell, even fasting works.
Yes it is correct, and I posted a scientific study published by one of the most prominent research centers on exercise science in the entire world to prove it. Losing fat may be about just calories in versus calories out, but building muscle AND losing fat is both about calories AND macronutrients. When you're building muscle, a 2,000 calorie carbohydrate-only diet will NOT have the same effect as a 2,000 calorie diet of mostly protein with some carbs and fat! This is why macros are so important.
Yea, that's the broscience I'm talking about.
Are you seriously this stupid that you don't even understand the importance of macros when building muscle? Am I just debating with a ten year old kid who clearly knows absolutely nothing about diet and exercise??
I'm either really stupid or just that much smarter than all of you bros in the realm of health and fitness.
WOW I can't believe how utterly ridiculous your statements can get! I am literally sitting here in total disbelief at your utter lack of knowledge on this topic.
I can regurgitate all the bro-science. My argument was not that the "science" is a lack of knowledge, it's that the "science" in the fitness industry is bull****.
OP is trying to build muscle and burn fat, and you're telling him "protein doesn't have much to do with it"??? LMAO! Oh my god you cannot be serious. You have GOT TO BE TROLLING THIS THREAD no human being can seriously be this dumb!
I don't have to, your own source did that for me.
The average American diet also consists of many times the daily allowance for fats and carbs, with an incredibly immense excess of calories and very little exercise which leads to the fat epidemic that all modern developed countries are facing today.
I said nothing about fats and carbs. My comment was specifically regarding protein. There is no need for a conscious effort to include protein in your diet to build muscle unless you are a vegetarian. You will get more than enough protein in the standard Western diet, because our meat consumption is already way too high.
As for protein requirements, here is an interview with exercise scientist Dr. Peter Lemon which confirms everything I said about the amounts of protein OP should aim for:
http://www.seriousaboutfitness.com/...tary-protein-an-interview-with-dr-peter-lemon
And I quote:
"Strength athletes require 1.7-1.8 grams of protein per kilogram of body mass per day (or 0.77-0.82 grams of protein per pound of body mass per day)"
From your own source:
When pushed to extremes, why does the body need more protein? It is still unclear, but Dr. Lemon says it may be as simple as providing the energy and raw materials needed to build and maintain. He goes on to say:
"Maybe the individuals who consume this much are expending vast amounts of energy on training and require vast amounts of protein to maintain the muscle mass.
He doesn't sound too sure, does he?
So much for your "science." We do things a little differently in the physical sciences. Namely, testing our hypothesis among different variables, then re-testing for confirmation (as I said before).
Which is exactly what I told OP. All of my advice to him has been based on solid scientific evidence which is used by the world's top athletes as well as recreational lifters in order to gain muscle and get ripped.
I'm still waiting for a scintilla of science from you.. anything at all.
News flash kid:
The world's top athletes and fitness models are on steroids.
Why are you quoting a statement that the study authors did not make?? That is not what they said at all!!
What the scientists concluded was that high protein and low calorie (low carb/low fat) and lots of exercise was not just "one way" to lose fat and gain muscle as you erroneously quoted, it was in fact THE BEST WAY to gain muscle and lose fat.
Brush up on your reading comprehension, go learn a little bit about basic exercise science, then come back here and show us what you have learned.
There is nothing here for you to teach me. Like I said, I know more about being ripped than 99.9% of men will ever dream of knowing.
(Hint: you have to be ripped to know)
OP, you don't have to train six days a week to get results. But what the research shows is that if you want quick maximal gains, this is the best protocol to follow: high protein, low calorie, and LOTS of exercise.
Quick gains are irrelevant.
You came here for advice, and I gave you the best and most precise advice you're going to get. It is up to you to decide who's you want to take:
Quick fix or long-term health? My approach let's each individual reach the apex of their genetic potential, without drugs or bro-science. Eat clean, train 3 times per week, and increase the intensity or duration ~5% per week.
a guy (me) who tells you to increase protein, decrease calories, and lift a lot of weights.. or a guy (eyebrollin) who tells you to "just eat better and don't mind whether your diet is mostly carbs or protein."
The advice pretty much speaks for itself.
Strawman fallacy
Misrepresenting someone's argument to make it easier to attack.