We have been seeing a lot of threads lately about HB 9's who have the following issues:
1) Bytchiness
2) Entitlement
3) Flaking
4) AW'ing
5) The hoe ain't loyal
6) etc etc
It's natural for us to want the hottest girl in the club. But all of a sudden we are SHOCKED when we find out she's not a good natured girl with values and morals who only dates one guy at a time.
My suggestion would be to look beyond looks and see who's compatible with you. Am I saying you should go for HB 2's? Not at all. But rather look for high quality rather than good looking first. Your first criteria shouldn't be looks but rather whether they are dateable. If the girl isn't dateable you should next her immediately.
Trying to pull a HB 10 and then coming back on SS to complain that she's a wh0re is not helping anyone. You need to learn from your mistakes and not make the same one's twice. Don't take disrespect from women, and know going into the relationship that if a girl is very good looking you can't expect much. I think it was Atom who said that looks are inversely proportional to one's character.
Just my $0.02.
1) Bytchiness
2) Entitlement
3) Flaking
4) AW'ing
5) The hoe ain't loyal
6) etc etc
It's natural for us to want the hottest girl in the club. But all of a sudden we are SHOCKED when we find out she's not a good natured girl with values and morals who only dates one guy at a time.
My suggestion would be to look beyond looks and see who's compatible with you. Am I saying you should go for HB 2's? Not at all. But rather look for high quality rather than good looking first. Your first criteria shouldn't be looks but rather whether they are dateable. If the girl isn't dateable you should next her immediately.
Trying to pull a HB 10 and then coming back on SS to complain that she's a wh0re is not helping anyone. You need to learn from your mistakes and not make the same one's twice. Don't take disrespect from women, and know going into the relationship that if a girl is very good looking you can't expect much. I think it was Atom who said that looks are inversely proportional to one's character.
Just my $0.02.