Gain Muscle FAST: Here's how I do it

dbot

Master Don Juan
Joined
Jan 12, 2003
Messages
531
Reaction score
63
I am a hard gainer. I used to use the standard 3 workouts per week, different muscle group each day, etc. It worked, but since then I've found something better. Much better.

Now I only work out twice per week, and each workout is around 24 minutes in length. In 4 weeks I put on 17lbs of pure muscle. Not possible, right? Wrong.

Here's how you do it:


Diet

Take your total body weight and multiply it by 20. That's the total number of calories you must consume every day, in the following ratio:

30% Fat
30% Protein
40% Carbs

This means, for every pound of body weight, you must eat:

0.5 grams of Fat
1.5 grams of Protein
2.0 grams of Carbs

These are guidelines. You don't have to count every calorie (I don't) but your daily caloric intake should be somewhere close to these numbers. Spread it out as best you can. Everyone recommends you eat 6 meals per day. I eat 4 meals per day because it's more convenient and still works just fine. Do whatever you have to as long as you make sure your body is getting all the right calories it needs.

Post Workout:

Most people guzzle protein right after working out. Protein isn't what your body needs right then. You need at least 100 grams of carbohydrates within 30 minutes of finishing your exercise. I've found the best post-workout meal to be a full box of Kraft Macaroni and Cheese. If you're worried about the sodium, then just eat an equal amount of spaghetti instead.

Free Day:

Designate one day a week (a non-workout day) where you completely ignore the diet and consume less than HALF of the calories your body needs. This is important because it keeps your body from getting used to the higher calorie intake.


Exercises

Workouts should be no more than TWICE per week. I work out on Mondays and Fridays.

Each workout consists of 6 exercises: Pull-ups, Squats, Bench Press, Dead Lifts, Shoulder Press, Dips

Only perform ONE SET of each exercise, allowing 3 full minutes of rest between exercises.

Perform each exercise to complete failure. Aim for somewhere between 8 and 12 reps.

Every repetition should have a 5/5 cadence (5 seconds up, 5 seconds down)

Total workout should not exceed 30 minutes in length.

Change the order of the exercises every 2 or 3 weeks.

That's pretty much all there is to it. Be sure to constantly be adding weight to your exercises or beating your max reps from your previous workout. Also, switch around the order of your exercises every couple of weeks. Have fun!
 

Warboss Alex

Master Don Juan
Joined
Jun 7, 2005
Messages
4,175
Reaction score
30
dbot said:
I am a hard gainer.

In 4 weeks I put on 17lbs of pure muscle.
make your mind up. 17lbs in 4 weeks is pretty damn good genetics. a true hardgainer would have trouble putting on 17lbs in a year. :)
 

Kerpal

Master Don Juan
Joined
Mar 11, 2004
Messages
3,049
Reaction score
41
17 lbs of muscle in a month? You must be a genetic masterpiece when it comes to bodybuilding.
 

Lust

Master Don Juan
Joined
Jan 6, 2007
Messages
834
Reaction score
19
Sounds a little dodgey to me... can you explain the science behind it?
 

dbot

Master Don Juan
Joined
Jan 12, 2003
Messages
531
Reaction score
63
Yes, I'm a true hard gainer. Those 4 weeks are not representative of my years of struggle with different workout routines and diets. Also, initial gains tend to be much higher than seasoned bodybuilders who have already packed on early muscle. Not only that, but it's way easier to regain muscle mass you used to have than it is to build completely new muscle. Genetic masterpiece? Not exactly :D

By no means am I an expert, but I do know this is what works best for MY body. The science (or at least the study) behind this plan goes back to the Colorado Experiment conducted by Arthur Jones in the early 1970s. Check it out here: http://www.bodybuildingfanatic.com/coloradoexperiment.htm

As someone mentioned above, this is indeed the same idea brought along by Tim Ferris in his blog. However, I could not manage 34lbs in 4 weeks. That's absolutely insane. He does mention though that he consumed roughly 5-6 thousand calories each day, which is double what my intake is. I have enough trouble as it is eating 3000 calories in a day, I don't think I could eat more without hurting myself. That would be roughly 40x my body weight in calories. No way.
 

MrLuvr

Senior Don Juan
Joined
May 31, 2005
Messages
399
Reaction score
8
I have tried something similar, but the problem I have with working out only twice a week and eating 3500-4000 Calories a day is that I gain too much fat.

I HAVE to either cut down the calories or do cardio almost every day to keep the fat off. And as a result I haven't been able to get the types of gains you post about.
 

dbot

Master Don Juan
Joined
Jan 12, 2003
Messages
531
Reaction score
63
MrLuvr said:
I have tried something similar, but the problem I have with working out only twice a week and eating 3500-4000 Calories a day is that I gain too much fat.

I HAVE to either cut down the calories or do cardio almost every day to keep the fat off. And as a result I haven't been able to get the types of gains you post about.
Because of my body type I can get away eating tons, so you may have to make some adjustments. Did you try tweaking your ratio? Try 40% protein, 30% carb, 30% fat instead. Also, sticking to slow carbs (such as corn, beans, or legumes, as opposed to bread or potatoes) should help keep your body fat levels down.
 

ssj4halo

Don Juan
Joined
Aug 21, 2008
Messages
180
Reaction score
4
What do you mean by "low carb"? Are you saying that all types of bread and all potatoes are bad for you for mass?
 

dbot

Master Don Juan
Joined
Jan 12, 2003
Messages
531
Reaction score
63
ssj4halo said:
What do you mean by "low carb"? Are you saying that all types of bread and all potatoes are bad for you for mass?
Absolutely not. But if you're putting on too much fat while bulking you may need to limit calories from high GI foods, such as potatoes or bread, to some degree.

Consider this scenario: You want to keep your daily intake above 3000 calories to keep your metabolic rate up, but eating 300g worth of pasta and potatoes every day is increasing your body fat more than you'd like. So instead, you can eat 200g worth of high GI carbs, and get the rest of your carbohydrates from beans or legumes, which will help limit fat storage.

Of course everyone's body is different, so there's no perfect ratio that will suit anyone. But for most hard gainers, a 40% carb split should be optimal.
 

Interceptor

Master Don Juan
Joined
Apr 25, 2007
Messages
2,610
Reaction score
135
Location
Florida
Most people guzzle protein right after working out. Protein isn't what your body needs right then
Dbot, can you elaborate on this?
And can you please provide links to the scientific research that supports this too?
Thanks.
 

ssj4halo

Don Juan
Joined
Aug 21, 2008
Messages
180
Reaction score
4
dbot said:
Absolutely not. But if you're putting on too much fat while bulking you may need to limit calories from high GI foods, such as potatoes or bread, to some degree.

Consider this scenario: You want to keep your daily intake above 3000 calories to keep your metabolic rate up, but eating 300g worth of pasta and potatoes every day is increasing your body fat more than you'd like. So instead, you can eat 200g worth of high GI carbs, and get the rest of your carbohydrates from beans or legumes, which will help limit fat storage.

Of course everyone's body is different, so there's no perfect ratio that will suit anyone. But for most hard gainers, a 40% carb split should be optimal.
You should do more research on the GI scale.

There are many exceptions for the GI scale. And Most bread IS good for you for mass gain. Ever heard of whole wheat bread. Its a staple for carbs. True its processed, but w/e. It still has a Low GI. Potatoes are an exception to the GI scale. Some potatoes are GREAT for mass gain. Yams are GREAT for mass gain. Even if its GI is high, its get processed in your body REALLY slowly.
 

ssj4halo

Don Juan
Joined
Aug 21, 2008
Messages
180
Reaction score
4
Interceptor said:
Dbot, can you elaborate on this?
And can you please provide links to the scientific research that supports this too?
Thanks.
Protein is REALLY important after working out. However, Simple carbs are even MORe important. There is a lot of science behind it. But in a nutshall it has to do with Growth Hormones(important hormone for building muscle) and increasing it. To make it simple, if you eat simple carbs after working out, your growth hormone raises.
 

dbot

Master Don Juan
Joined
Jan 12, 2003
Messages
531
Reaction score
63
Interceptor said:
Dbot, can you elaborate on this?
And can you please provide links to the scientific research that supports this too?
Thanks.
Although the importance of protein after workout is arguable, we do know that there's no immediate(read: additional) need for it at that time.

Carbohydrates are a different story. Your body MUST have carbs to replenish glycogen stores in your muscles that were depleted during workout. Without them, there's a good chance your body will start secreting cortisol and breaking down muscle tissue for that purpose.

Also, eating high GI carbohydrates will create an immediate insulin response and a boost in growth hormone to help shuttle glycogen to your muscle tissue.

This is common, well documented information that isn't really debated in the bodybuilding community, so I'm not going to dig up studies right now to prove it. If you want to experiment with adding protein to your post-workout meal that's fine, but the carbohydrates are absolutely critical and should be your number 1 priority.

ssj4halo: I agree with everything you said regarding carbohydrates like bread and potatoes being great for building mass. If you reread what I said, I explained that limiting consumption of bread and potatoes would only be smart if you're storing too much fat. Otherwise those are exactly the types of carbs you should be eating. Also, I only reference the glycemic index because its accurate at showing a certain food's rate of absorption. But I don't think it's a good system to base your diet around.
 

slim

New Member
Joined
Oct 22, 2008
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
I'm sorry mate, but I'd really like to see more numbers and pictures of before and after. Can you provide these?
 

dbot

Master Don Juan
Joined
Jan 12, 2003
Messages
531
Reaction score
63
Well I'm a poor sucker and don't own a digital camera, but here's the transition:

when I started:
5'10"
144lbs
9% bf

right now:
5'10"
162lbs
10% bf

I didn't take before/after measurements of my chest or waist or anything because I didn't care to, but if you want detailed results click on one of the Tim Ferriss links that someone posted above. He did pretty much the exact same program, and he has details and photos and whatnot.
 

Nygard

Senior Don Juan
Joined
Jul 3, 2007
Messages
463
Reaction score
12
Location
Medellin - Colombia
Do you really think I can pay for a diet like that? :S
I'm no easy gainer, but i'm no hard-gainer either and i'm doing just fine.
 

ssj4halo

Don Juan
Joined
Aug 21, 2008
Messages
180
Reaction score
4
dbot said:
Well I'm a poor sucker and don't own a digital camera, but here's the transition:

when I started:
5'10"
144lbs
9% bf

right now:
5'10"
162lbs
10% bf

I didn't take before/after measurements of my chest or waist or anything because I didn't care to, but if you want detailed results click on one of the Tim Ferriss links that someone posted above. He did pretty much the exact same program, and he has details and photos and whatnot.

5 10' 144 lbs. I don't think your a hardgainer mate. From looking at your weight vs your height, you seem more like a mesomorph. However, I really can't say without a picture. Some people use wrist measurements, hardgainers tend to have it around 6.5 inches, whats yours? What are you measurements for your chest/arms/legs now?
 
Top